Our focus

Source: Tertiary Education Commission

Our focus Tō Mātou Aronganui

In this section, you will read about our organisational strategy which aims to ensure the tertiary education system can respond to change and continue to improve outcomes for learners and industry.
I tēnei wāhanga ka ako koe mō ngā whāinga tōmua o te Rautaki Mātauranga Matua 2014–2019 me te āhua o ōna pānga ki tā mātou whakapaunga pūtea tautoko ā-tau, tata ki te $3 piriona. Kei konei hoki tā mātou rautaki umanga hei pānuitanga māu. Ko tāna, he whai ana kia aro atu te pūnaha mātauranga matua ki ngā rerenga kētanga o te wā, kia whai tonu kia pai ake ngā huanga mō ngā ākonga me ngā wahi ahumahi. 

Timing for the release of Investment Plan guidance

Source: Tertiary Education Commission

Last updated 20 November 2023
Last updated 20 November 2023

Print

Share

In late February 2024, the Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) will release guidance to tertiary providers on what to include in their Investment Plan for 2025.
In late February 2024, the Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) will release guidance to tertiary providers on what to include in their Investment Plan for 2025.

Plan Guidance, the Strategic Intent and Learner Success Plan template and the Gazette notice for Investment Plans will all be available in late February 2024. These documents contain information about our priorities and expectations for provision in 2025 and how your Plans will reflect this.
For this funding round the information released in February 2024 will contain our overarching priorities for investment as well as some specific target areas in provision for foundation, vocational and higher education. We are also incorporating into Plan Guidance the improvements in performance outcomes we are looking for from TEOs to achieve our investment priorities. Previously, we released this information as Investment Briefs.
Investment Round indicative timeline for 2025
To help you prepare for the next funding round, we are releasing an indicative timeline of the major milestones that will occur for investment in 2025.

Activity

Timing

TEC releases Plan Guidance and Plan engagement begins

End of February 2024

TEC publishes notices in the New Zealand Gazette setting out requirements for Plan content, timetable, assessment, and Plan summaries

End of February 2024

Government announces Budget

May 2024

TEC provides indicative allocations

By 4 June 2024

TEC releases Mix of Provision (MoP) and Educational Performance Indicator Commitment (EPIC) templates

By 10 June 2024

TEC releases Supplementary Plan Guidance to reflect any policy or Budget changes (as required)

June 2024

Providers submit proposed Plans, including MoPs, EPICs, Learner Success Plans (LSPs) and Disability Action Plans (DAPs)

By 5 July 2024

TEC reviews proposed Plans and has further discussion with providers as needed

July–October 2024

Providers are notified of decisions in writing

From November 2024

First payments made against Plans; Plan delivery begins

January 2025

TEC Consultation Papers 2026

Source: Tertiary Education Commission

Last updated 15 November 2023
Last updated 15 November 2023

Print

Share

This page provides links to Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) consultation papers, consultation feedback summaries and decision documents related to Quality Evaluation 2026.
This page provides links to Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) consultation papers, consultation feedback summaries and decision documents related to Quality Evaluation 2026.

The TEC consults with the sector and other stakeholders on a range of issues as part of implementing Quality Evaluation 2026.
See the table below for Performance-Based Research Fund (PBRF) Quality Evaluation 2026 consultation papers. We will update this table over time.

New resource to support Refugee-background tertiary learners to succeed

Source: Tertiary Education Commission

Last updated 15 November 2023
Last updated 15 November 2023

Print

Share

Refugee-background learners are an active but frequently overlooked learner group. They access, participate in, and complete tertiary education at significantly lower rates than their non-refugee-background peers. When tertiary education organisations miss opportunities to support them to realise their potential, they can struggle to achieve.
Refugee-background learners are an active but frequently overlooked learner group. They access, participate in, and complete tertiary education at significantly lower rates than their non-refugee-background peers. When tertiary education organisations miss opportunities to support them to realise their potential, they can struggle to achieve.

Refugee-background (RB) learners are diverse and resourceful and want to achieve in tertiary education.
Build your understanding and create an inclusive tertiary learning environment for refugee-background learners
The Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) in partnership with Aotearoa New Zealand National Tertiary Network to Support Refugee Background Learners, community and tertiary education representatives have produced Best Practice Guidelines to Support Refugee-Background Tertiary Learners in Aotearoa New Zealand. The guidelines are based on a comprehensive independent research report and the lived experience of staff and learners across the country.
The resource is designed to achieve an inclusive and equitable tertiary learning environment where RB learners can succeed and staff of tertiary education organisations (TEOs) become more confident in supporting them.
The Guidelines are packed with information and good practices TEOs can apply throughout every RB learner’s tertiary education journey. It covers five areas:
Pre-access – outreach and relationship building
Access – pathways and admission
Participation – transition, engagement and progression
Attainment – completion and graduation
Transitions out – graduate destinations.
The term “refugee-background” recognises any person who has entered, or is a resident in Aotearoa New Zealand as a result of one of six diverse pathways:
The UNHCR Quota Programme
Refugee and protection status (claim for asylum)
Family reunification (Refugee Family Support Category)
Community Organisation Refugee Sponsorship
Other migrant pathways
Descent from former refugees.
The Guide is available at Refugee-background learners resources.
Learner success for all is a priority for the Tertiary Education Commission
We have large groups of learners who are currently underserved by the tertiary education system, including RB learners. We need to change that. TEC is working with a range of organisations to develop resources for TEOs so they better understand the special needs of underserved learners and can develop systems to support them to complete their education. Remember best practice for RB learners is best practice for all learners.
This work is part of the TEC’s Ōritetanga Learner Success work, to support all TEOs to put learners at the centre of their organisation.

PTE Strategic Fund

Source: Tertiary Education Commission

Last updated 27 April 2023
Last updated 27 April 2023

Print

Share

The Private Training Establishment (PTE) Strategic Fund is a key part of the strategic component of the Unified Funding System (UFS). It seeks to address national and regional skills needs and support programme development and maintenance.
The Private Training Establishment (PTE) Strategic Fund is a key part of the strategic component of the Unified Funding System (UFS). It seeks to address national and regional skills needs and support programme development and maintenance.

The PTE Strategic Fund uses an open, contestable process to select proposals that will enable the vocational education system to best serve learner needs and adapt to ongoing and future challenges. The funding is through two elements of the strategic component:
National and Regional Skills Priorities (NRSP) funding supports PTEs to respond to national and regional skills priorities, and is informed by advice from Workforce Development Councils and Regional Skills Leadership Groups.
The Programme Development and Maintenance Fund (PDMF) supports programme development and/or maintenance aligned with the government’s Reform of Vocational Education objectives.
Find out more about successful applications from the 2023 funding round:
TEC awards $13 million strategic funding to 61 PTEs for vocational education initiatives
TEC awards $2.3m of strategic funding for VET initiatives

Micro-credentials funding and fees

Source: Tertiary Education Commission

Funding for micro-credentials
We want to invest in micro-credentials that meet the needs of industries and communities, and support government priorities delivered by highly capable TEOs. To be funded, micro-credentials need to have a clearly established industry or community need, be tightly focused on a set of skills and have stand-alone value.
Not all quality-assured micro-credentials can be funded by the Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) as we have to prioritise how we distribute funding. Our investment in micro-credentials will complement rather than replace existing privately funded training. Alongside the micro-credentials we fund, we expect employers, industries, and learners will cover the full cost of others themselves. 
We are open to funding micro-credentials at any level of the New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework (NZQCF), but we want to ensure that learners are supported to make good choices, including enrolling in full qualifications where appropriate.
For more information on the micro-credential funding conditions, see the DQ1-2, DQ3-7 and DQ7+ funding conditions for the relevant year.
Eligible organisations
All TEOs eligible for Delivery on the NZQCF funding at any level (DQ1-2, DQ3-7 (non-degree), and DQ7+) in 2023 can apply for funding to deliver micro-credentials.
If your organisation is not currently approved to receive any funding from us via an Investment Plan, you will first need to apply for funding as a new provider. For more information about this process, see Application to receive TEC funding.
Talk to us early
If you are a TEO creating a new micro-credential, we encourage you to discuss your ideas with us in the early stages of your micro-credential’s development, before submitting it to the New Zealand Qualifications Authority (NZQA), if you hope to receive TEC funding for its delivery. We will advise you if it is something we could potentially fund before you invest resources into developing it.
How to apply
The current TEC criteria and guidelines for the approval of TEO-developed micro-credentials came into effect on 1 November 2022. All applications must meet the approval criteria and use the form below: 
How to submit your application
Please read the criteria and guidelines carefully and submit your completed application using Workspace 2. Notify us by emailing micro-credentials@tec.govt.nz.  
You can apply at any time. We expect to advise outcomes within four weeks. It may take longer than this in some circumstances or if we require additional information.
WDC-developed micro-credentials
The criteria and guidelines outlined on this page do not apply to Workforce Development Council (WDC)-developed micro-credentials as those are not subject to specific TEC approval. Where a TEO wishes to gain accreditation to deliver a micro-credential developed by a WDC, the TEO needs to apply to NZQA. If granted accreditation by NZQA, the TEO can then follow the standard TEC process for new qualifications by entering the micro-credential in Services for Tertiary Organisations (STEO).
If you have any questions about this, please call us on 0800 601 301 or email customerservice@tec.govt.nz.
Fee limit on micro-credentials
Fee regulation settings for micro-credentials are published in the funding mechanisms.
Funding mechanisms and delegations
A maximum fee limit applies to some micro-credentials.
For the 2023 calendar year, the maximum that you can charge for micro-credential fees is $60 (GST inclusive) per credit, if approved for TEC funding. This includes both new and existing micro-credentials.
From 1 January 2024, the maximum that you can charge for micro-credential fees is $64 (GST inclusive) per credit, if approved for TEC funding. This includes both new and existing micro-credentials.
This fee limit only applies to micro-credentials funded through the DQ3-7 and DQ7 and above funds. It does not apply to micro-credentials delivered in work-based learning modes funded through DQ3-7 or micro-credentials that are part of an approved programme leading to a qualification on the NZQCF.
For micro-credentials that are part of an approved programme leading to a qualification on the NZQCF, Annual Maximum Fee Movement (AMFM) rules apply. Further information about the AMFM can be found on our webpage.
Delivery at Levels 3–7 (non-degree) on the New Zealand Qualification and Credentials Framework and all industry training (DQ3-7)
Delivery at Level 7 (degree) and above on the New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework (DQ 7+)
You may seek an exception to the fee limit by applying through our micro-credential fee limit exception process.
You will need to provide evidence that the micro-credential has:
Higher actual and reasonable costs: applicants need to demonstrate that the total funding and fee revenue for the micro-credential, compared with the costs to deliver the micro-credential, make it financially unsustainable to offer it, and that there are no satisfactory alternatives to limit costs.
Strong industry need: applicants must provide evidence that there is strong support from industry and/or employers to deliver the micro-credential and that it clearly meets industry and/or employer needs, despite the rate of the fee.
How to apply for an exception to the fee limit
Information about how to apply is provided in the application template. Please read the instructions carefully.
Exception to the Fee Limit on Micro-credentials – application template (DOCX 259 KB)
If you already receive funding for your micro-credential and are only seeking an exception to the fee limit, you will only need to submit an exception to the fee limit application.
If you are seeking funding for your micro-credential and seeking an exception to the fee limit you will need to submit both an exception to the fee limit application and a TEO micro-credential application.
TEO micro-credentials – application template (PDF 638 KB)
Email your completed exception applications and other relevant supporting information to our Customer Contact Group at customerservice@tec.govt.nz with the subject line [EDUMIS] – Micro-credential fee limit exception application.
Re-prioritising funding from existing allocation
If we approve a micro-credential for funding, we expect that in most cases TEOs will re-prioritise funding from within their existing allocation. To do this, you will need to make an in-year Plan Amendment via a MoP change in Workspace 2.
You can increase the number of learners you enrol in the micro-credential over time (and make any necessary changes to the MoP) but you would need to ensure that the micro-credential continues to meet the priorities set out in the Tertiary Education Strategy, Plan Guidance and Supplementary Plan Guidance in force at the time of the proposed increase.
Plan Guidance and ToolkitTertiary Education Strategy
If we approve your micro-credential for funding and you would like to seek additional funding for it, you can submit an additional funding request either at the time of your micro-credential application, or after it is approved. You will need to follow the standard process for additional funding. You can do that as part of the annual investment round or as an in-year additional funding request.
We may consider investing additional funding to support micro-credentials if there is an exceptionally compelling case for strong employer or community demand and a clear contribution to government priorities.
In considering further funding, we will look at the performance of existing provision by the TEO, including whether their existing allocation can be reprioritised from lower performing provision to the micro-credential.

Guidance to develop your Investment Plan

Source: Tertiary Education Commission

Many of the templates you require for drafting and submitting your Plan (for example Mix of Provision (MoP) templates) are available in Workspace 2.
Please refer to the table below for other relevant templates.

Template description 

Who needs it

Submission deadline

Strategic Intent and Learner Success Plan template (DOCX 4.1 MB) 
This template was previously known as the Investment Plan template. It has two parts.
Strategic Intent – Tertiary education organisations (TEOs) can use this section of the template to structure the strategic intent component of their Investment Plan (Plan). It sets out the requirements for proposed Plans and ensures we have all the information we require to make informed investment decisions.
Learner Success Plan – TEOs are encouraged to use the template, or to use the headings provided to guide their own document.

Strategic Intents are required from all TEOs submitting a full Investment Plan.
Learner Success Plans are required from all TEOs submitting a full Investment Plan and receiving more than $5 million in on-Plan funding. 

By 7 July 2023

2024 Investment Plan additional funding requests
The TEC will be taking a targeted approach to 2024 Investment Round Additional Funding for the Delivery on the New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework at Levels 7 and above (DQ7+) Fund. Our focus will be on high priority areas and provision where there is demand for growth. We will contact you in 2024 if you meet our criteria for additional funding.
We will not be considering 2024 Investment Round Additional Funding Requests (AFRs) for the Delivery on the New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework at Levels 3-7 (DQ3-7) Fund. We will communicate our approach to In-Year AFRs for this fund after the 2024 April SDR.
The TEC will be considering 2024 Investment Round AFRs for the below funds:
Delivery on the New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework at Levels 1 and 2 (DQ1-2)
Youth Guarantee (YG)
Adult and Community Education (ACE) Funds (ACE in Communities, ACE in Schools, and ACE in Tertiary Education Institute (TEIs))
Intensive Literacy and Numeracy Fund (ILN)
Intensive Literacy and Numeracy ESOL Fund (ILN ESOL)
TEO-led Workplace Literacy and Numeracy Fund (WLN TEO-led)
Intensive Literacy and Numeracy Refugee English Fund

By 7 July 2023

2023 additional funding requests – in-year amendments
The TEC will take a targeted approach to providing TEOs additional funding for DQ 3-7 and 7+ funds in 2023. We will be focusing on high priority areas and provision, where there is demand for growth.  
This targeted approach will ensure our investment process is effective for the sector and the TEC while continuing to support learners, their whānau, employers and communities.
The targeted approach to additional funding will be for these specific funds:
Delivery and Qualification Levels 3-7 (DQ3-7)
Delivery and Qualifications Levels 7 and above (DQ7+)
Your Relationship Manager (RMI)/Customer Advisor (CA) will contact you if you meet the criteria for targeted funding. 
We will not be taking the targeted approach for the following funds. Application forms for additional funding in these funds will be available on our website from mid-May:
Delivery and Qualification Levels 1 and 2 (DQ1-2)
Youth Guarantee (YG)
Adult and Community Education (ACE) Funds (ACE in Communities, ACE in Schools, and ACE in Tertiary Education Institute (TEIs))
Intensive Literacy and Numeracy Fund (ILN)
Intensive Literacy and Numeracy ESOL Fund (ILN ESOL)
TEO-led Workplace Literacy and Numeracy Fund (WLN TEO-led)
Intensive Literacy and Numeracy Refugee English Fund
The additional funding application period is from 1 June to 29 September 2023.

Application period is from 1 June to 29 September 2023.

New provider process
The process for providers wishing to apply for TEC Investment Plan (“on-Plan”) funding for the first time is outlined at Application to receive TEC funding.

Any TEO that has not received on-Plan funding in the last 12 months

By 7 July 2023

2024 first-time work-based learning funding application
This page sets out the process and requirements for providers seeking funding for work-based learning for the first time.

TEOs that receive TEC on-Plan funding but have not previously received it for work-based learning. Also required for new providers that do not receive TEC on-Plan funding. These providers also need to follow the New Provider process described above.

By 7 July 2023

We want to remind all TEOs that your Plan documents, including your Strategic Intent, Learner Success Plan, Disability Action Plan, MoPs and Educational Performance Indicator Commitments (EPICs) must all be submitted through Workspace 2. Please do not submit these documents by email as this can result in delays.

Programme eligibility – Youth Guarantee

Source: Tertiary Education Commission

A tertiary education organisation (TEO) can only use YG funding for New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework (NZQCF) qualifications and their associated programmes and courses.
Before the Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) can consider funding a qualification, the TEO must first obtain approval and accreditation for a programme leading to the qualification from the New Zealand Qualifications Authority (NZQA). Once NZQA approval is obtained, the TEO may seek TEC funding approval.
To find a current list of qualifications and courses approved for YG funding for your organisation, use the qualification search or course search on the Services for Tertiary Education Organisations (STEO) application.
For the full programme eligibility requirements, see the Youth Guarantee funding conditions for the relevant year.
Minimum requirements
YG Fund funding provision should:
lead to the award of a qualification that is either NCEA at Level 1, 2 or 3; or another National or New Zealand Certificate at Level 1, 2 or 3 on the NZQCF
include literacy and numeracy provision
comprise part of a recognised pathway (as determined by NZQA) towards one or more vocational qualifications at Level 4 and above on the NZQCF
be aligned to the Vocational Pathways (if it leads to a Level 1 or 2 NCEA qualification)
be provided by tutors who are appropriately qualified.
For example, from 2023 0.5 EFTS means:
40 credits for a programme leading to a Level 1 or 2 qualification, and
60 credits for all other programmes.
For more information on Vocational Pathways and the list of standards in each pathway see Youth Guarantee.
Youth Guarantee delivery must be face-to-face (for example, not delivered via distance learning or in a work-based setting) unless we authorise you in writing to use an alternative delivery method.
Submitting a qualification for access to YG funding
Qualification and course approval is carried out through our section of the Data and Exchange Platform (DXP) Services for Tertiary Education Organisations (STEO) application. Through this application each TEO:
registers and maintains qualifications and courses for funding
updates qualification, course and delivery site details, and
submits its Single Data Return (SDR).
For technical information on using DXP STEO to obtain approval for qualification eligibility to access funding, see the STEO User Guide.
A TEO approved to receive YG funding may request to deliver alternative or additional qualifications to those listed in its Mix of Provision (MoP).
When submitting a new qualification for access to funding, we recommend that you:
consider whether it meets the eligibility criteria for YG funding;
consider whether it aligns with:

check on availability of funding, particularly if:
funding is being sought for Level 3
there will be a change in the type of delivery (trades/non-trades funding), or
delivery is being proposed at a new delivery site; and

complete external quality assurance body requirements in a timely manner (this will ensure that each student who is enrolled in the approved qualification will have timely access to student allowances and the Student Loan Scheme, if eligible).
Once we have received the necessary information, we will decide whether or not the qualification meets the eligibility requirements for YG funding. For the full eligibility requirements, see the Youth Guarantee funding conditions for the relevant year.
If we approve the qualification as eligible for funding, we will release your YG MoP, so you can revise and submit it to us for approval.
Process for approving a qualification for funding
Determining eligibility
To enable us to determine whether or not to approve a qualification as eligible to access YG funding, we require the following information when the qualification is submitted for approval through the DXP STEO application:
the provider code (EDUMIS number) of the TEO seeking the approval
the qualification code used on the New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework (NZQCF)
the title of the proposed qualification
the number of learning hours per week
the number of full-time teaching weeks per year
the equivalent full-time student (EFTS) value of the qualification calculated using the following methods:
credits
learning hours
full-time weeks, and approval documents from the relevant quality assurance body.

When approving a qualification as eligible to access YG funding, we will:
check that the details of the programme leading to award of the qualification are consistent with your quality assurance approval for the programme
consider whether the EFTS value of the qualification is correct
check that the course, programme and/or qualification are eligible in accordance with the funding mechanism and/or funding conditions
consider whether eligible learners enrolled in the qualification will be able to access the Student Allowance/Student Loan Schemes, and
consider whether delivery of the qualification aligns with our investment priorities, what the stakeholder needs are, and the extent of existing similar provision.
We will not backdate approval for access to the Student Allowance/Student Loan Schemes. Therefore, we require this information from you at least four weeks before the start of tuition for the qualification. This will ensure that each learner who is enrolled in an approved course or programme can access financial support if eligible.
Enrolling learners in a newly approved qualification
You can start enrolling learners in the programme leading to the new qualification, and access funding, after the qualification has been:
listed in your YG MoP with regions of delivery and EFTS, and
we have approved your MoP for funding.
A detailed description of the required information is set out below.
TEO/provider code
You must give us the four-digit code assigned by the Ministry of Education to uniquely identify your TEO. A list of the four-digit codes assigned to each TEO is set out in Appendix 1 of the SDR Manual.
Qualification code
You must supply the qualification code. The format of the qualification code is alphanumeric, usually two letters followed by four numbers. Select the New Zealand Certificate/Diploma from the National Qualification List on the DXP STEO application.
If you intend to offer a New Zealand Certificate listed on the NZQCF, use the NZQCF code for the qualification for all references to the qualification.
A TEO can submit its New Zealand Qualifications Authority (NZQA) approval for one programme that leads to a New Zealand qualification in STEO. When additional programmes are approved by NZQA that lead to the same New Zealand qualification, you must send the approval to the TEC so we can agree to the delivery (do not submit the documentation through STEO). Programmes leading to New Zealand qualifications should not be submitted under a local/provider code in this situation.
Qualification codes for trades and non-trades (and NCEA)
If you have NZQA programme approval for a trade programme and a non-trade programme for the same qualification (ie, one learner is enrolled on 50% of P1, C1, L1 courses while another is enrolled on 50% A1, J1), you need to set up two separate local qualification codes to reflect these different programmes.Only qualifications at Levels 2 and 3 can be funded at the trade rate.
Note: Where the qualification will only be delivered as either trade or non-trade, you only need to set up the relevant qualification code. 
A TEO approved by NZQA to deliver the National Certificate of Educational Achievement (NCEA) Level 2 with a Vocational Pathway needs to set this up in STEO using the qualification codes below.

Code 

Title

Level

Description

NCEAL1

National Certificate in Educational Achievement L1

L01

YG Non-Trades

NCEP1T

Construction and Infrastructure Trade L2

L02

YG Trades

NCEP1N

Construction and Infrastructure Non-trade L2

L02

YG Non-Trades

NCEP2T

Manufacturing and Technology Trade L2

L02

YG Trades

NCEP2N

Manufacturing and Technology Non-trade L2

L02

YG Non-Trades

NCEP3T

Primary Industries Trade L2

L02

YG Trades

NCEP3N

Primary Industries Non-trade L2

L02

YG Non-Trades

NCEP4T

Service Industries Trade L2

L02

YG Trades

NCEP4N

Service Industries Non-trade L2

L02

YG Non-Trades

NCEP5T

Social and Community Services Trade L2

L02

YG Trades

NCEP5N

Social and Community Services Non-trade L2

L02

YG Non-Trades

NCEP6T

Creative Industries Trade L2

L02

YG Trades

NCEP6N

Creative Industries Non-trade L2

L02

YG Non-Trades

NCEA3T

National Certificate in Educational Achievement Trade L3

L03

YG Trades

NCEA3N

National Certificate in Educational Achievement Non-trade L3

L03

YG Non-Trades

 Use the qualification code system below to enter the trade/non-trade codes in STEO.
“C” represents a National Certificate, whereas “Z” represents a New Zealand Certificate.
This is followed by the four-digit NZQCF code for the qualification.
This is followed by “T” identifying it as a trade programme (50% or more of the provision is trades), or “N” identifying it as a non-trade programme (50% or more of the provision is non-trades).

Code 

Title

Level

Description

CxxxxT

National Certificate in Xxxxx Level 3

L03

YG Trades

CxxxxN

National Certificate in Xxxxx Level 3

L03

YG Non-Trades

ZxxxxT

New Zealand Certificate in Xxxxx Level 3

L03

YG Trades

ZxxxxN

New Zealand Certificate in Xxxxx Level 3

L03

YG Non-Trades

Title of qualification
You must give us the title of the qualification(s) for which you are seeking approval for funding.
This does not mean the title of the programme that NZQA approved, unless the programme title and qualification title are the same.
Duration
You must provide us with information about the duration of the programme, specifically the learning hours and full-time teaching weeks as approved by NZQA.
Learning hours
NZQA defines “learning hours” as all planned learning activities leading towards the achievement of programme or qualification learning outcomes.
Types of learning activities include but are not limited to:
lecturer and tutor contact hours, including workshops and tutorials
tests and assignments
supervised practical placements
study time
self-directed learning activities that you expect the student to engage with/participate in, and
examination periods.
There are three fields for types of learning activities on the DXP STEO application. A TEO should break down its various learning activities, and enter hours in the STEO fields below as accurately as possible, based on the guidance below. The three fields are:
teaching hours each week – eg, face-to-face classroom/online/field trip/simulation time, tutorials, on-site assignments, assessments and examinations
work experience hours each week – eg, time the learner spends practising or learning skills relevant to their study programme in a workplace; this includes a teaching workplace, which may be on-site, as long as it operates as a commercial enterprise, and
self-directed study hours each week – “self-directed study” means only TEO-directed study carried out by the learner; eg, time the learner spends on off-site assignments (such as homework assignments), and TEO-directed reading and study hours, that the learner must complete in their own time. Note: self-directed study does not include self-directed activities that the learner initiates.
Note: A TEO will need to use a consistently applied rationale, in terms of which activities constitute what programme learning hours in STEO for each of the three fields above.
In relation to the number of learning hours in the qualification, you must give us the:
number of teaching hours each week (see above)
number of hours each week of work experience (see above)
number of self-directed learning hours each week (see above)
total number of learning hours each week
total number of learning hours in each year
number of years it will take to complete the qualification, and
total number of learning hours in the qualification (number of learning hours in each year multiplied by the number of years).
Total learning hours in STEO must be the same as the total programme/qualification learning hours approved by NZQA. We expect actual delivery to align with the total learning hours and the learning activities approved by NZQA. This means we expect each TEO to regularly review the delivery of its programme(s) to ensure they are “right sized” for most learners (recognising that some learners take more or fewer learning hours to achieve a qualification than others).
Note: During audits and investigations we may check whether a TEO’s delivery reflects our and NZQA’s approvals. To do this we triangulate NZQA approval documentation, STEO data, and your information for learners, and compare the information to actual delivery.
Full-time teaching weeks
A full-time teaching week includes the types of learning hours outlined above.
In relation to the number of teaching weeks in each year of the qualification, you must give us the:
number of full-time equivalent teaching weeks
number of weeks of recess in each year
total number of full-time teaching weeks and recess weeks in each year – FTE gross
number of credits on the NZQCF contained in the qualification, and
number of credits that a learner must achieve each year to complete the qualification.
We generally will not approve a qualification for funding that is longer than 34 weeks in a year.
You must not enrol a learner in more than:
1.5 EFTS (120 credits) of Level 1 and/or 2 YG qualification provision in any year, or
1.0 EFTS (120 credits) of Level 3 YG qualification provision in any calendar year.
EFTS value of the qualification
We require the EFTS value of each qualification in order to determine whether a qualification is eligible to access YG funding.
For conditions on assigning EFTS values to qualifications, see YG funding conditions.
The EFTS value of each qualification must be specified to no more than four decimal places. The EFTS value determines the workload involved in each qualification and is required so that we can appropriately fund you to deliver the qualification. 
For the purposes of STEO, MoPs and SDR reporting, the EFTS value is calculated using 120 credits per EFTS for all Level 1–3 qualifications (the standard number of credits that equate to one full-time year of study).
This information must be determined using the following methods:
credits,
learning hours, and
full-time weeks.
Each of the three methods should produce the same result. If they do, we can be confident that a student who is studying for a qualification is undertaking a normal and reasonable workload.
Each method is set out in more detail below.
Credits
A credit measures the average amount of learning that is required to complete the qualification or part of the qualification. 
The EFTS value can be calculated using the credits method by dividing the number of credits for the qualification by 120 (the standard number of credits that equate to one full-time year of study in STEO). 
Example: If a qualification has 60 credits: 60 divided by 120 = 0.5 EFTS.
Learning hours
The EFTS value can be calculated using the learning hours method by dividing the qualification’s total learning hours by 1,200 (the standard number of learning hours that equates to a full-time year of study).
Example: If the total learning hours for one semester in a qualification is 600 hours: 600 divided by 1,200 = 0.5 EFTS.
Full-time weeks
The EFTS value can be calculated using the full-time weeks method, by dividing the length of tuition for the qualification in weeks by 34 (the standard number of weeks that equate to one full-time equivalent teaching or tuition year). 
Example: If the qualification has a length of 17 weeks: 17 divided by 34 = 0.5 EFTS.
EFTS value when a qualification has strands
A qualification may have a range of options or electives with variable credit combinations. These are called strands. Each strand is likely to have a different total EFTS value.
If a qualification has two or more strands, you should determine the EFTS value for each strand. We require the EFTS value of the strand that has the highest EFTS value for our calculations.
You must calculate the EFTS factor of each course in the strand in order to calculate the EFTS value of the strand. The EFTS factor of a course can be determined in the following ways:
Divide the course credits for a qualification that has up to 120 credits by 120.
For a qualification that has more than 120 credits, and we have agreed to fund more than 1 EFTS per student per year, divide the course credits by the credit value of the qualification.
For a qualification that has more than 120 credits, and we have not agreed to fund more than 1 EFTS per student per year, divide the course credits by 120.
Example:

Calculating the EFTS value of a qualification with strands

Strand 1

Credits 

Course EFTS factor 

Strand 2

Credits 

Course EFTS factor

Course 1

15 

0.1250 

Course 1

15 

0.1250

Course 2

15 

0.1250 

Course 2

15

 0.1250

Course 3

26 

0.2167

Course 3

 26 

0.2167

Course 4

10 

0.0833 

Course 6

10 

0.0833

Course 5

0.0500

Course 7

0.0417

 

 

 

Course 8 

0.0333

Totals 

72 

 0.6000 

 

75 

0.6250

 
In this example, if we approve the qualification for funding, it will be approved as 75 credits as this is the credit value of the longest strand. The EFTS value of the qualification is therefore 0.625 (75 credits/120 = 0.625 EFTS).
If an approved qualification in STEO has a value of 1.0 EFTS but more than 120 credits, the credit value of the longest strand is used to determine the course EFTS factor for each strand. This ensures that courses common to both strands have the same EFTS factor.
Example: In this example, the credit value of 150 is used to divide the credits, not 120:

Calculating course EFTS factors in a qualification of more than 120 credits in one year with strands  

Strand 1 

Credits 

Course EFTS factor 

Strand 2

Credits 

Course EFTS factor

Course 1

30 

0.2000 

Course 1

30

0.2000

Course 2

30

0.2000

Course 2

30

0.2000

Course 3

52 

0.3467

Course 3

52 

0.3467

Course 4

20 

0.1333 

Course 6

20

0.1333

Course 5

12

0.0800

Course 7

10

0.0667

 

 

 

Course 8 

8

0.0533

Totals 

144

 0.9600 

 

150 

1.0000

Quality assurance requirements
To be eligible for YG funding, a course must be part of a programme that has been quality assured. For TEOs that receive YG funding, the quality assurance body is the New Zealand Qualifications Authority (NZQA).
To determine whether to approve a qualification for Youth Guarantee funding as part of your MoP, we require evidence in your Investment Plan that NZQA has approved the programme leading to the award of the qualification.
Under Section 101 of the Education and Training Act 2020, the New Zealand Teachers Council is responsible for conducting, in conjunction with quality assurance agencies, approvals of teacher education programmes and qualifications that lead to teacher registration.
Defining a qualification
You must give us the following information that defines the qualification:
the award category code (recognised qualifications have an award qualification category code – refer to Appendix 9 of the SDR Manual)
the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) Level, and the ISCED code of the qualification (refer to Appendix 9 of the SDR Manual)
the level of the qualification on the NZQCF (refer to Appendix 9 of the SDR Manual)
the outcome (ISCED destination) of completing the qualification (for example, whether the qualification is designed to lead the learner directly into the labour market), and
the New Zealand Standard Classification of Education (NZSCED) of the qualification (refer to Appendix 8 of the SDR Manual). 
Making a change to a programme leading to the qualification
To make a change to a programme leading to a qualification, you must first check with NZQA if their approval is required for the change.
Once you have the required approval, you need to reflect the changes in STEO. In doing that, you must meet the requirements of any conditions on making changes to qualifications.
For conditions on making changes to qualifications, see the YG funding conditions.
Information about courses
NZQA approves a programme leading to a qualification, and the TEO then submits the qualification to us through STEO for approval as eligible to access YG funding. We may then agree to fund the qualification.
Following that, the TEO must disaggregate the qualification into component courses in STEO. You must give us all of the following information about each component course in the qualification:
provider code
course code
course title
qualification code
delivery classification
NZSCED field of study
level of the course on the NZQCF
number of credits of the course
funding category of the course
EFTS factor of the course, and
whether the course has embedded literacy and numeracy skill development in the provision.
Some of the key fields required for SDR submission are outlined in more detail below. 
Delivery classification (CLASS)
You are required to classify your courses using the current Delivery Classification Guide.
New Zealand Standard Classification of Education (NZSCED)
The NZSCED is a subject-based classification system that contributes to international reporting, and in some cases may be used to describe the Mix of Provision in your Investment Plan.
All courses must be classified using the NZSCED classifications on a “best fit” basis according to their predominant subject matter. This means that the chosen NZSCED classification reflects the largest part of a course’s subject matter.
A full list of NZSCED classifications is provided in the SDR Manual Appendices. 
For more information on NZSCED classifications, see New Zealand Standard Classification of Education – Education Counts.
Funding category (CATEGORY)
The funding category includes:
an alphabetic code that relates to the delivery classification, and
a numeric code that reflects the level of study.
Alphabetic code
The alphabetic code (based on delivery classification) is used to record YG funded course subjects. It is also used to determine DQ7+ funding but not Youth Guarantee funding. The alphabetic code can be found in Table 2, Appendix 1 of the Delivery at Levels 7 (degree) and above on the New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework (DQ7+) Funding Mechanism.
Numeric code
For YG courses the numeric category will always be 1, as set out in the table below.

Category (numeric code)

Classification by level and content of study

1

Courses designed for non-degree qualifications with no research requirement, including certificates and diplomas

EFTS factor of courses (FACTOR)
The EFTS factor of a course equates to the course size that is a portion of the total EFTS value of the programme leading to award of the qualification of which the course is part. In DXP STEO, the field name is “Qualification” (which means programme leading to award of the qualification).
As a guideline, we recommend that the size of the smallest course should not have an EFTS factor of less than 0.1.
Although you may choose to deliver a smaller course, if the course is based on a single unit standard and has a course EFTS factor of less than 0.1, we do not require you to further disaggregate the course in STEO.
You may report delivery for one qualification as one course. However, that means that a learner can only enrol in the one course (ie, the whole programme) leading to award of the qualification.
After a programme has been disaggregated into courses and we have approved these as eligible for access to YG funding, you cannot retrospectively disaggregate the programme further.
For the purposes of STEO, MoPs and SDR reporting, EFTS factors are calculated using 120 credits per EFTS for all Youth Guarantee provision (the standard number of credits that equate to one full-time year of study).
Calculation
If a qualification is measured in credits, we require the EFTS factor of a course to be calculated by:
dividing the number of credits in the course by the total number of credits in the qualification, and
multiplying that number by the EFTS value of the qualification. 
The EFTS factor must be expressed to four decimal places.
Example: If a qualification has a total of 60 credits and an EFTS value of 0.5, the EFTS factors of the courses in the qualification are calculated as:

Courses

Credits

Qualification EFTS value

Course EFTS factor

1

24

0.5

24/60 x 0.5 = 0.2000

2

20

0.5

20/60 x 0.5 = 0.1667

3

16

0.5

16/60 x 0.5 = 0.1333

 

Credits = 60

 

EFTS value = 0.5

Embedded literacy and numeracy flag (EMB LIT NUM)
You must indicate whether the course includes embedded literacy and/or numeracy provision.
A course with embedded literacy and numeracy provision will deliver deliberate teaching of literacy and numeracy skills and will be part of a programme that has:
explicit literacy and numeracy statements, such as learning outcomes or teaching and learning statements within programme or course information
a literacy and numeracy diagnostic assessment for each learner, and
assessment of each student’s progress in literacy and numeracy skill development.
Closing a qualification
You can remove a qualification that you no longer offer from your MoP and close it from DXP STEO. This removes the qualification from your list of active qualifications and the NZQA Register of Quality Assured Qualifications.
The process can be found on the STEO application.
Tertiary education organisation (TEO) eligibility
To receive Youth Guarantee (YG) Fund funding, you must continue to be:
Te Pūkenga – New Zealand Institute of Skills and Technology (Te Pūkenga); or
a wānanga; or
a private training establishment (PTE); or
a State or State-integrated school that has been funded by us for YG provision since 2011.
 See the YG funding conditions from the relevant year for the full TEO eligibility requirements.
Funding conditions by year
Programme eligibility
See the YG funding conditions from the relevant year for the full programme eligibility requirements.
Funding conditions by year
Minimum requirements
YG Fund provision should: 
lead to the award of a qualification that is either NCEA at Level 1, 2 or 3; or another National or New Zealand Certificate at Level 1, 2 or 3 on the New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework (NZQCF)
include literacy and numeracy provision
comprise part of a recognised pathway (as determined by the New Zealand Qualifications Authority [NZQA]) towards one or more vocational qualifications at Level 4 and above on the NZQCF
be aligned to the Vocational pathways (if it leads to a Level 1 or 2 NCEA qualification)
be provided by tutors who are appropriately qualified.
 From 2023 0.5 EFTS means:
40 credits for a programme leading to a Level 1 or 2 qualification, and
60 credits for all other programmes.
For more information on Vocational Pathways and the list of standards in each pathway see Youth Guarantee.
Youth Guarantee delivery must be face-to-face (for example, not delivered via distance learning or in a work-based setting) unless we authorise you in writing to use an alternative delivery method.
Learner eligibility
See the YG funding conditions from the relevant year for the full learner eligibility requirements.
Funding conditions by year
Learners must not be simultaneously enrolled in school and a Youth Guarantee funded qualification.
Learners must not be enrolled in a Youth Guarantee funded qualification and also be enrolled in another TEC-funded programme at the same time, eg, Intensive Literacy and Numeracy (ILN), Delivery at Levels 1 and 2 on the New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework (DQ1-2), New Zealand Apprenticeship or Gateway.
A learner that is eligible for ILN-funded programmes is not considered to have the necessary literacy and numeracy skills to be successful in a Youth Guarantee programme.
Limit on qualification prior achievement
Qualification prior achievement limits are to ensure that government funding is targeted to learners with no or low qualification prior achievement, and to enable learners to pathway to higher level qualifications.
In practice this means:
a new enrolment is the first time that learner has been enrolled in Youth Guarantee at that TEO, and
the TEO must verify individual learners’ prior achievement before accepting them into the programme.
Level 1 and 2 programmes
TEOs must ensure that learners who already hold a qualification at Level 1 or 2 on the NZQF comprise no more than 10% of new enrolments in a Youth Guarantee programme leading to award of a qualification at that level.

Learner holds a qualification at …

And enrols in a qualification at …

Learner will be included in the 10% prior achievement calculation in each year of delivery

Level 1

Level 1

Yes

Level 2

Level 2

Yes

Level 1

Level 2

No

A learner enrolment in a subsequent Youth Guarantee qualification at the same TEO at any level is not considered a ‘new enrolment’.
Level 3 programmes
To meet the learner eligibility requirements the TEO must:
not enrol a learner in a Youth Guarantee programme if the learner has already achieved a qualification at Level 3 or above on the NZQF, and
prioritise enrolments in Youth Guarantee programmes that lead to award of a level 3 qualification on the NZQF to:

learners who enrolled in Youth Guarantee with low prior achievement (no qualification or a Level 1 qualification), and
learners who have completed a Level 1 or 2 qualification funded through Youth Guarantee.

Age limit for learners
Learners may be re-enrolled in Youth Guarantee, as long as they continue to meet the learner eligibility conditions, including enrolling in no more than 1.5 EFTS provision per calendar year.
Some learners may turn 25 years old during a programme they are enrolled in. These learners remain eligible for Youth Guarantee for the courses required to complete their qualification.
Youth Guarantee funding is not available for learners who have already turned 25 years old to re-enrol in courses they did not successfully complete. Keep this in mind when you enrol a learner who is close to turning 25 years of age, as any re-enrolments in qualifications or courses will need to be self-funded by the learner or from DQ1-2/Delivery at Levels 3–7 (non-degree) on the New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework and all industry training (DQ3-7) Funds funding. 

Equity funding

Source: Tertiary Education Commission

Last updated 9 October 2023
Last updated 9 October 2023

Print

Share

This page contains information for tertiary education organisations about using Equity funding. For 2023, Equity funding is available for Māori, Pacific, and disabled learners.
This page contains information for tertiary education organisations about using Equity funding. For 2023, Equity funding is available for Māori, Pacific, and disabled learners.

Making education easier to access and improving the achievement of all learners is a core part of the priorities outlined in the Tertiary Education Strategy. 
Tertiary education organisations (TEOs) contribute to this by accommodating the diverse needs and aspirations of learners of all ethnicities, genders, ages, abilities and socio-economic backgrounds.
Equity funding is a “top-up” to:
Delivery at Levels 1 and 2 on the New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework (DQ1-2) Fund (available only for disabled learners), and
Delivery at Levels 7 (degree) and above on the New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework (DQ7+) Fund (available for Māori, Pacific, and disabled learners).
For learners with disabilities, Equity funding seeks to improve their participation in tertiary education and achievement of qualifications. For Māori and Pacific learners, it is to improve participation in and achievement at higher levels of tertiary education (Level 7 (degree) and above).
Equity funding helps cover the costs of any additional support some learners may need and is not intended to be the sole or primary source of funding. Equity funding should supplement DQ1-2 and DQ7+ funding and contribute to ensuring the success of all learners.
Equity funding does not apply to the Non-degree Delivery at Levels 3–7 on the New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework and all industry training (DQ3-7) Fund which includes TEOs to put learners at the centre of their organisation and to improve outcomes for learners.
Resources
We expect all providers to offer the support required for learner success. These resources contain helpful information:

PBRF Quality Evaluation 2026 – Consultation open on Panel-Specific Guidelines

Source: Tertiary Education Commission

Last updated 29 September 2023
Last updated 29 September 2023

Print

Share

Consultation is now open on the draft Panel-Specific Guidelines for the Performance-Based Research Fund (PBRF) Quality Evaluation 2026.
Consultation is now open on the draft Panel-Specific Guidelines for the Performance-Based Research Fund (PBRF) Quality Evaluation 2026.

The Panel-Specific Guidelines have been developed by peer-review panels to support staff members submitting their Evidence Portfolios (EPs) for assessment in Quality Evaluation 2026.
Along with the Guidelines for TEOs participating in Quality Evaluation 2026 (TEO Guidelines) and the Guidelines for the Quality Evaluation 2026 assessment process (Assessment Guidelines), the Panel-Specific Guidelines provide panel- and subject-specific guidance for participating tertiary education organisation (TEO) staff members. They incorporate the in-principle decisions on EP design made by the Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) on the basis of the Sector Reference Group’s consultation process and recommendations since September 2021.
The TEC is consulting on the draft Panel-Specific Guidelines to ensure the guidance serves TEO staff submitting EPs for assessment.
Read the Draft Panel-Specific Guidelines (PDF 1.2 MB)
Consultation, feedback and next steps
Consultation on the draft Panel-Specific Guidelines is open from 29 September to 10 November 2023.
You can submit feedback via this online survey: Panel-Specific Guidelines.
The peer-review panels and TEC will carefully consider all feedback. The final guidelines will be published in December 2023.