Opposition to teacher title bill growing

Source: National Party – Headline: Opposition to teacher title bill growing

National’s Education Spokesperson Nikki Kaye says a bill supported by the Labour Government will undermine educators throughout the country by restricting the use of the term ‘teacher’.

“The Education (Protecting Teacher Title) Amendment Bill removes the ability of those who do not have certain recognised teaching qualifications from calling themselves ‘teachers’. Anyone who breaches this is liable to pay a $2000 fine,” Ms Kaye says.

“This bill jeopardises many of our current teachers and early childhood teachers whose current qualifications and experiences fall outside of the criteria.

“It has the potential to undermine and devalue our many educators who contribute to the wellbeing of our country. There are already provisions in the law to penalise people who may be misleading people about their qualifications. 

“The impact of the bill is not even isolated to the education sector. Are we going to fine every music teacher, dance teacher, and swimming teacher? 

“National believes there are far greater priorities for education. This bill has far reaching consequences for many people. 

“As per questions raised by National MPs in public hearings, we don’t even have basic information on the number of educators or education businesses affected by this change. But we know it will at least be thousands of people. 

“Even the Attorney-General has come out against the bill as it breaches the Bill of Rights, yet the Government continues to support it.

“This bill is a solution looking for one problem and creating another.”

Submissions for the Education (Protecting Teacher Title) Amendment Bill close today at midnight and can be made here.

Davis confirms more serious offenders to be let off

Source: National Party – Headline: Davis confirms more serious offenders to be let off

Corrections Minister Kelvin Davis has today confirmed that the Government is looking at relaxing bail and sentencing laws for serious and violent criminals, and interfering with police prosecutions to reduce the prison population, National’s Corrections Spokesperson David Bennett says.

“After months of the Government avoiding questions about how it intends to meet its prison population reduction target, Mr Davis has clarified that it is considering making it easier for serious and violent offenders to get bail and harder for them to go to prison in the first place.

“When asked a very straight question about whether the Ardern-Peters Government is considering making changes to bail and sentencing laws for serious and violent criminals, Mr Davis confirmed it was looking into it.

“What’s more, Mr Davis also confirmed he was willing to speak to the Police Minister about interfering in operational matters to stop Police prosecuting criminals to try and reduce the prison population.

“The reason we let the Police decide who they should prosecute is that they are best placed to know who poses a real risk to society and safety.

“The fact Mr Davis is willing to direct who police prosecutors should and should not prosecute suggests he is more concerned with Labour’s ideological crusade than protecting the public from people who pose real harm.

“This is all in the name of trying to avoid the decision of whether or not to build new beds at Waikeria Prison. Given there are less than 200 prison beds left throughout New Zealand, the Ardern-Peters Government is yet again putting ideology ahead of the protection of the community.

“Public safety and reducing crime is one of National’s top priorities. It is very worrying that the Ardern-Peters Government has decided it is willing to gamble the public’s safety for its own ideologies.”

Labour’s ideology threatens Pasifika potential

Source: National Party – Headline: Labour’s ideology threatens Pasifika potential

National’s spokesperson for Pacific Peoples, Alfred Ngaro, says the very real progress being made by Pacific students is being put at risk by the Government backing away from using a targeted approach to their education. 

“We’ve been making great strides in Pacific education,” Mr Ngaro.

“For the first time since NCEA was introduced, the results for Pacific students and Pakeha students are just about on par.

“I’d like to offer my sincere congratulations to these students and their families for the hard work they’ve put in to lift their achievement levels.

“These results have been supported by the targeted approach National asked the education sector to take to help lift student achievement. 

“In 2008, Pacific students were achieving just 50 per cent at NCEA level 2, and since we introduced National standards and Better Public Service targets, that figure rose to 81 per cent.

“I’m now incredibly concerned at the approach Labour Minister of Education Chris Hipkins is taking to the sector.

“Mr Hipkins has scrapped National standards and the partnership school model.

“We believe replacing the decile system with one that invests where there is student disadvantage should be a priority.

“I’m also concerned about the fact the Government won’t confirm whether it will support key initiatives to help young Pasifika students.

“Mr Hipkins is looking to get rid of targets, get rid of standards and, in doing so, diminish the potential of success for Pacific People in New Zealand.

“Education policy should be driven by evidence, not ideology. The results achieved by students in the last few years demonstrate that National’s pragmatism was the right way forward in achieving better outcomes.

“Pacific people deserve better, New Zealand deserves better,” Mr Ngaro says.

Oil and gas changes show Govt’s brazen arrogance

Source: ACT Party

Headline: Oil and gas changes show Govt’s brazen arrogance




“The Government has shown breathtaking arrogance by keeping the oil and gas industry in the dark over changes to the sector”, says ACT Leader David Seymour.

“Fronting media today, it was abundantly clear that the Government hadn’t consulted the industry on the changes.

“The Government has set up about 40 reviews, working groups, or panels, and yet it appears unwilling to consult those who disagree with them on policy.

“This is an emerging theme with the Government.

“Food executives came away shocked at Ministers’ behaviour after David Clark and Damien O’Connor threatened them with a sugar tax if they didn’t voluntarily reduce the level of sugar in their food.

“David Parker’s colleagues are concerned he has neglected consultation with iwi on charging a royalty on bottled water exports.

“Speaking about a water tax during the election campaign, Parker told farmers ‘I’m not here to negotiate. Don’t push me or it will be two cents instead of one cent.’

“Chris Hipkins hasn’t even bothered to speak to charter school operators or students since he became a Minister and is pushing ahead with plans to close the schools.

“The brazen arrogance with which this Government is operating lays bare the contempt they hold for those who disagree with them”, says Mr Seymour.

Ending offshore exploration is lose-lose

Source: ACT Party

Headline: Ending offshore exploration is lose-lose




“The Government’s decision to end offshore oil and gas exploration will put 11,000 jobs at risk and could harm the environment”, says ACT Leader David Seymour.

“The oil and gas industry creates thousands of jobs, contributes $2.5 billion to the New Zealand economy and $500 million to the Government in royalties each year.

“Not only will this policy make us poorer as a country, it will drive production of oil and gas overseas which will harm the environment.

“Natural gas has about half the emissions of coal, and New Zealand-produced oil has lower emissions than oil produced overseas

“Ending offshore exploration will force New Zealand households and firms to buy higher-cost and dirtier energy from foreign sources.

“This is another example of Jacinda Ardern governing by what sounds good without asking the questions ‘will this policy work’ and ‘what will be the side effects’?

“This is a dangerous and arrogant government that will destroy wealth and opportunity without warning – no sector is safe.

“This is a lose-lose policy and the Government should consider very carefully how it will impact New Zealanders”, says Mr Seymour.

National to fight for public safety

Source: National Party – Headline: National to fight for public safety

National Party Leader Simon Bridges says law and order, and the safety and security of New Zealanders, will be one of his core priorities as Leader of the Opposition.

“We have a Government that wants to cut the prison muster without first reducing crime,” Mr Bridges says. “That sort of ‘catch and release’ approach will put New Zealanders at risk.

“Around 98 per cent of people in our prisons are there for some of the most serious and violent types of crimes – including serious assaults, burglary, sexual violence and murder.

“The damage these people cause is immeasurable and their punishment shouldn’t be lessened just because the Government has an ideological view that there should be fewer people in prison.

“I know this first hand, having spent years as a Crown prosecutor putting serious offenders behind bars.

“The previous National Government responded to public safety concerns and made it harder for serious offenders to get bail. We shouldn’t make it easier for them to get out again just for the sake of reducing prison numbers.

“The Ardern-Peters Government needs a plan to reduce crime and deal with existing prisoners, rather than just reducing prisoner numbers.

“We need to help people move away from a life of desperation and crime. In Government, National had a huge focus on that and achieved real success – overall crime dropped but the rate of serious crime remains too high.

“Through our social investment approach we educated prisoners and gave them practical skills so they have a better chance of finding work when they are released.

“We also invested in drug and alcohol courts and treatment, and we started rolling out courts specifically targeting young Māori to help improve their lives before they ended up in prison.

“To safely reduce prison numbers you need to reduce crime and to do that you need the right plans and policies in place.

“This Government doesn’t have either and its stated intention to release more prisoners is dangerous and we won’t let it happen without a fight.”

Speech to Rutherford College

Source: National Party – Headline: Speech to Rutherford College

Good morning. It’s great to be back here at Rutherford College.

Twenty-four years ago I was sitting where you are, probably thinking, “who is this guy and how long is he going to talk for?”

It was as a student here that I got my first taste of the spotlight, in a production of Oliver.

I tried out for the lead, but instead was given the role of Undertaker.

Politicians like to think that everyone knows who they are but that’s not something I take for granted.

I’m the Leader of the Opposition. I replaced Bill English two months ago.

I am the person who is trying hard between now and the next election to persuade New Zealanders that I should be the next Prime Minister.

Whether that happens is ultimately up to you.

I’m assuming all of you will be old enough to vote in the 2020 election, and you should do so. Your vote is worth the same as your mum or dad’s vote, and the same as mine.

Each person has the same vote as everyone else. That’s pretty basic, and it underpins our democracy. 

As Leader of the Opposition there is a view that I’m supposed to be grouchy and always complaining about things.

But that’s not me.

For a start, we live in the best country in the world.

OK, I am biased, but there’s evidence.

Of 200 countries, New Zealand is ranked first for overall prosperity, first for personal freedom and first for civil rights. You live in the least corrupt country in the world, and the easiest to do business in.

It wasn’t always the case.

Ten years ago, 30,000 people a year were leaving New Zealand to move to Australia.

Now more people are coming the other way.

New Zealand in 2018 is a successful, prosperous, confident country.

I want to ensure we stay the best in the world because being the best at anything – as some of you will already know – takes real work and can’t be taken for granted.

Other people, or other countries, want that title. If we slack off, it’s pretty easy to suddenly find we’re second best, or third best, or not even mentioned.

I don’t want that happening to New Zealand. 

I want New Zealanders to succeed.

I want you to have opportunities to gain new skills, to get your first proper jobs and to follow your dreams.

Because I will be asking for your vote in 2020, I believe you have the right to know who I am. You should know what drives me and what I stand for.

I grew up a Westie – one with a blended background.

My mum is Pakeha and Dad is Māori.

We lived near enough to here that I walked to school. As a family, we weren’t well off, but we never went without.

I am the youngest of six children.

Looking back at my time here at Rutherford College, I was a bit of a swot.

I had some fantastic teachers who taught me that ideas matter.

Although when I was keen to talk about them – which was most of the time – I think my teachers thought maybe they’d made a mistake in encouraging me.

A few of them thought I was pretty cheeky.

I’d often find myself getting into what I’d call ‘robust debates’ with teachers in class. I think they just called it arguing.

So, no surprise, I got into debating. It’s a useful job skill for politics – although I can safely say Mum no longer writes my debate notes out for me on those little cards.

I suspect that sometimes when she sees what I’ve said on the news, she wishes she still did. 

Growing up, my parents instilled in me a strong sense of right and wrong.

Dad was a Baptist minister at the church around the corner from here, so as well as being a supportive family we were taught the value of serving the community.

I liked music and for a while, I wanted to be a conductor. But I also wanted to do something that involved thinking and talking, so I studied law. 

You are all facing decisions about what to do when you leave school.

For some, university will be the way to go. Others will find their niche in the trades. Some might move straight into a job.

If you know what you want to do, that’s great. If you don’t yet have a clue, that’s fine too.

When you’re young, it can seem like everyone else knows more about how the world works, and where they fit in. Believe me, most of the time, that’s not the case.

But not knowing what to do with your life is not an excuse for not working hard to better yourself.

In fact not knowing what you want to do is all the more reason to stick at education or training, or following your passion, because you need to be in a position to grab opportunities when they come up. 

Most importantly, do something. Statistically, life outcomes are poor for people who sit around and do nothing.

Unless you win Lotto – and sorry to break it to you, but the chances are you won’t – success is always going to involve hard work.

Naturally, our start in life influences who we grow up to be.

But even those who have tough childhoods do not need to be defined or limited by that. All of us have the ability to better ourselves, and improve our lot in life.

That belief is part of what drew me to the National Party.

I am ambitious for New Zealanders.

I back New Zealanders to succeed on their own two feet.

I back enterprise, and I think that people who take a risk and do well, and those who work hard, and who contribute to their communities, should be celebrated.

I also have a fundamental belief in personal responsibility. You can take pride in doing well, but you should take responsibility if you do harm. 

As I said, I studied law. First, in Auckland, then at Oxford University, in England.

The most important thing that happened to me at Oxford was that I met the woman I ended up marrying.

I’m not sure about the early impressions I made. After our first meeting, Natalie told her parents she’d met a handsome Japanese guy.

I was happy with the handsome. I was perplexed by the Japanese.

On our first date I bought takeaway coffees. I was trying to impress her so I bought a black coffee even though I actually liked it with milk.

Black sounded cooler.

I didn’t put the lid on properly. I spilt scorching black coffee all over my hand – burnt myself quite badly actually – which wasn’t very cool at all.

But it can’t have been all bad. By the end of that year we were married and she came back to Mount Maunganui with me.

We now have three young children. Emlyn who is six, Harry who’s four, and brand new Jemima who turned four months old just this week.

My career in the law led me to become a Crown prosecutor.

I was responsible for making the case to a judge or jury in court that someone was guilty and should go to jail.

Over time, I was in charge of hundreds of trials, sometimes dealing with the worst things one person can do to another.

Assaults, rapes and murders.

It was a role of huge contrasts. Many days I was depressed by the dark side of human behaviour.

But other times I was inspired by the resilience of victims, and sometimes by previous offenders who were gradually putting their lives back together.

One particular case will be with me forever.

One morning, outside a Tauranga school, a guy called Tony Robertson, who already had a string of convictions, managed to convince a 5-year-old girl to get in a car with him.

He pretended to talk to her mum on the phone, and promised the girl Christmas presents.

Thank God, her brother, who was seven, went in to school and told the teachers what had just happened. They called the Police.

Immediately, Police organised a district-wide manhunt. One officer – Sergeant Dave Thompson – had a hunch on where such an offender might go.

He drove way out of town to Kaiate Falls.

There he found Robertson and the girl still in his car, crying. To this day, I believe Sergeant Thompson saved her life.

Like so many of our Police, he is a true hero.

For him, it must have been as rewarding as policing gets.

For me, my job was to prosecute Robertson. I tried to get him the strongest sentence New Zealand has, which is preventive detention. It means a person can be kept in prison their whole life.

Instead he was given seven and a half years in jail, and was let out in December 2013 because he’d done his time.

Less than six months later, he abducted a woman. This time there was no heroic police officer to save her. 

Her name was Blessie Gotinco and Robertson raped and murdered her.

After that, he got preventive detention.

I’m sorry to relate to you such an upsetting case but it’s one reason why, as Leader of the Opposition, one of my priorities is law and order.

I don’t apologise for that. The lives of New Zealanders depend on it.

I believe in most people getting another chance, and I am a strong believer in rehabilitation to help people move away from a life of desperation and crime.

But I also believe that jail is absolutely the right place for some offenders.

It bothers me that the Government is talking about lowering the prison population, without explaining how it will lower the crime rate first.

In 2008 I was no longer satisfied just upholding the laws. I wanted to help make them.

That’s what Parliament does and I was elected as MP for Tauranga that year. 

I became a Minister in 2012, and have since held portfolios focusing on the economy, infrastructure, transport, broadband and the Government’s finances.

Mine is a story about the benefits of strong families, hard work, education and giving people opportunities.

My values are the values of the National Party and, I think, the values of many New Zealanders.

You deserve to feel safe. I believe that law and order is important to the security of all of us, and our families.

But my top priority, which affects everything else, is to ensure that New Zealand has a strong economy. 

A strong economy means more jobs and higher wages for Kiwis like you.

A strong economy means we can invest in the infrastructure and public services we need as a country, without raising taxes.

I talked earlier about how 10 years ago, over 30,000 people were moving from New Zealand to Australia every year. Some of you might have family members there.

That’s because Australia was where the jobs and opportunities were.

But when you finish school, I don’t want you to have to go to Australia to get your first job, or any job for that matter.

If you want to go on an OE, great – but it’s not great to be an economic refugee.

I want New Zealand to be a place you live knowing that you will have as many opportunities here as anywhere else. Actually more than anywhere else.

Those opportunities are thanks to a lot of hard work by Kiwis up and down the country.

It’s also thanks to the leadership of the National Government that encouraged entrepreneurship, creativity, innovation and job creation.

Those gains could be easily lost with the wrong government policies.

So for me, economic management comes first.

The final thing I want to cover with you is the environment and climate change.

The things that I think bring New Zealanders home, and keep us here, are family, friends, job opportunities and the environment.

Some of you might have seen that last month, the world’s last male Northern White Rhinoceros died in Kenya. There are two females left but you didn’t need to come top in Biology to know that it’s curtains for Northern White Rhinos.

These things are happening in the lifetime of your generation and mine, and they’re not only happening overseas. We have more endangered bird species here in New Zealand than any other country.

Protecting biodiversity is a human responsibility but it’s only one part of good environmental stewardship.

When I was Minister of Transport I announced a significant package of measures to help increase the use of electric vehicles in New Zealand, so that we use fewer fossil fuels to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and help tackle climate change.

New Zealand is a great place for electric vehicles, because three-quarters of our electricity comes from renewable energy. That’s the fourth highest in the developed world. 

And we’ve been relatively successful – in just the last year there were around 4,000 new electric vehicles registered in New Zealand. That’s almost as many electric vehicles as have been registered in Australia, ever.

There is never a silver bullet solution to environmental problems. It’s always complex, but there’s never any solution unless you prioritise the problem.

I will be doing that.

Never assume that just because the Greens are supporting the Government that everything is going to be okay. It isn’t, and it won’t be.

As I said when I started, I used to sit where you are when we had a speaker at school and I’d think “who is he, or she, and how long are they going to talk?”

So the answer to the first part of that question is that I’m Simon Bridges, Rutherford College old boy, Auckland University and Oxford University grad, former prosecutor, a politician, a husband, a father.

Mostly, I’m a person who loves my country and is ambitious for New Zealand and for New Zealanders.

As for the second part of the question, I’m just getting started.

I want to talk to people in every part of New Zealand. Thank you for letting me start with you here today.

Thanks for your attention. Good luck with whatever you do next and, I hope, like me, you’ll always be proud to have come from Rutherford College.

Gas and petroleum decision is economic vandalism

Source: National Party – Headline: Gas and petroleum decision is economic vandalism

The Government’s decision to ban gas and petroleum exploration is economic vandalism that makes no environmental sense, National MPs Jonathan Young and Todd Muller says.

“This decision will ensure the demise of an industry that provides over 8000 high paying jobs and $2.5 billion for the economy,” Energy and Resources Spokesperson Jonathan Young says.

“Without exploration there will be no investment in oil and gas production or the downstream industries. That means significantly fewer jobs.

“This decision is devoid of any rationale. It certainly has nothing to do with climate change.   These changes will simply shift production elsewhere in the world, not reduce emissions. 

“Gas is used throughout New Zealand to ensure security of electricity supply to every home in New Zealand. Our current reserves will last less than ten years – when they run out we will simply have to burn coal instead, which means twice the emissions.

“The Government says that existing wells will continue but that’s code for winding the sector down.

Climate Change Spokesperson Todd Muller says the decision makes no sense – environmentally or economically – because less gas production means more coal being burnt and higher carbon emissions.

“Many overseas countries depend on coal for energy production. Those CO2 emissions would halve if they could switch to natural gas while they transition to renewable energy.

“By stopping New Zealand’s gas exploration we are turning our backs on an opportunity to help reduce global emissions while providing a major economic return to improve our standard of living and the environment.

“We need to reduce global CO2 emissions. But there is no need to put an entire industry and thousands of New Zealanders’ jobs at risk.”

Mr Young says the Government’s decision today is another blow to regional New Zealand, and Taranaki in particular.

“It comes hot on the heels of big decisions that reduce roading expenditure, cancel irrigation funding, and discourage international investment in the regions.

“This is simply Jacinda Ardern destroying an industry in the cause of a political slogan pushed by Greenpeace.”

Oil and gas decision historic day for New Zealand

Source: Green Party

Headline: Oil and gas decision historic day for New Zealand

The Green Party is heralding today’s announcement ending new fossil fuel exploration in New Zealand’s oceans as a massive step towards a stable climate and to protecting our marine life and beaches.

“The Green Party and thousands of New Zealanders have been working for decades towards this day and this decision – that fossil fuels are not our future,” said Green Party Co-leader James Shaw.

“Ending deep sea oil and gas exploration has long been a key goal of the Green Party and today, in Government, we’ve delivered on it.

“The decision means our beaches, coastlines and marine life are now far less likely to be affected by a Deepwater Horizon-style oil spill in the future.

“Our Pacific neighbours, who are on the frontline of rising seas, can know that we’ve got their backs.

“Scientists tell us that we can’t burn almost all the oil, gas, and coal that has already been discovered. We simply cannot justify looking for more.

“Today we have drawn a line in the sand and set our country on the path to a clean energy, low carbon future. This represents an enormous opportunity for the creation of new jobs and new technologies that our dependence on fossil fuels has held back for too long.

“Although there will be no immediate impact on jobs, I can understand that some communities will have some concern over the transition away from fossil fuels and towards a low-carbon economy. That is why this Government is committed to a just transition, and to investing in well-paid, high-tech clean-energy jobs, particularly in our regions.

“As we move towards a fossil fuel-free future, we will move together – communities, government and business alike. Just last week, the Government announced a $20 million economic development investment in Taranaki, including conservation, tourism, clean energy, and the Maori economy.

“This is truly the nuclear free moment of our generation, and the beginning of a new and exciting future for Aotearoa New Zealand,” said Mr Shaw.

Contact

James Shaw MP

Article Type

Portfolios

Email Contact

Government Passes Puppy Dog and Ice-Cream Bill

Source: ACT Party

Headline: Government Passes Puppy Dog and Ice-Cream Bill




The Local Government (Community Well-Being) Ammendment Bill should be renamed the Puppy Dogs and Icecream Bill, according to ACT Leader David Seymour

“The Government is proactively removing the requirement for councils to deliver qualty services defined as ‘effective’ and ‘efficient.’ It reflects the Government’s underlying belief that if the intentions are good the results will follow, but the real world doesn’t work that way.”

The requirement ‘to meet the current and future needs of communities for good-quality local infrastructure, local public services, and performance of regulatory functions in a way that is most cost-effective for households and businesses.’ is being replaced with a non-requirement to ‘to promote the social, economic, environmental, and cultural well-being of communities in the present and for the future.’

“These changes are fundamental. They change the early sections of the Local Government Act, those sections that define the purpose of Local Government and set the tone for the Local Government Act and the behaviour of councils up and down New Zealand.

“Councils are poorly focused enough already. This bill will make them completely unfocused. The nuttiest community activists will have free reign to waste ratepayer money on their various well meaning but pointless projects. Meanwhile, the real problems of housing supply, transport infrastructure, and inadeqate water and wastewater infrastructure will remain unsolved while local councils chase puppy dogs and ice creams.