Parliament Hansard Report – Thursday, 14 November 2024 – Volume 780 – 001456

Source: New Zealand Parliament – Hansard

Question No. 7—Small Business and Manufacturing

7. CAMERON BREWER (National—Upper Harbour) to the Minister for Small Business and Manufacturing: What recent steps has the Government taken to improve payment times for small businesses?

Hon ANDREW BAYLY (Minister for Small Business and Manufacturing): My colleague the Hon Melissa Lee and I recently announced that the Government is committed to supporting faster payments for small businesses, especially given that the Government spends over $50 billion annually with its suppliers. From 1 January 2025, the Government’s 135 agencies will be required to pay small businesses much more promptly, providing these businesses with the timely cash flow they need to grow and succeed.

Cameron Brewer: What is the time line for implementing faster payment requirements for Government agencies?

Hon ANDREW BAYLY: From 1 January next year, the 135 agencies must pay 90 percent of trade invoices within 10 business days, increasing to 95 percent in 2026. Secondly, as part of the Government’s focus on encouraging greater digitisation of the economy, from 2026, Government agencies processing over 2,000 domestic invoices annually must use e-invoicing, ensuring payment within five working days.

Cameron Brewer: What steps will the Government take to ensure compliance with these payment rules?

Hon ANDREW BAYLY: To ensure compliance, we will require Government agencies to report their payment results quarterly. These results will be published on the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment website. This will allow anyone to check the compliance of relevant Government departments. These agencies will also have to report why they have failed to meet the payment requirements and front up to their respective Minister.

Cameron Brewer: How will these new rules impact the day-to-day operations of small businesses?

Hon ANDREW BAYLY: These rules are set to make a substantial difference. We know that for small businesses, cash flow is critical, and waiting extended periods for payment can hinder growth or even threaten survival. By mandating shorter payment times, we’re providing business owners with the resources they need to invest in their operations, whether it’s hiring more staff, upgrading equipment, or expanding services. This is all part of the Government’s support for small businesses.

Parliament Hansard Report – Karakia/Prayers – 001455

Source: New Zealand Parliament – Hansard

THURSDAY, 14 NOVEMBER 2024

The Speaker took the Chair at 2 p.m.

KARAKIA/PRAYERS

TEANAU TUIONO (Assistant Speaker): E te Atua kaha rawa, ka tuku whakamoemiti atu mātou, mō ngā karakia kua waihotia mai ki runga i a mātou. Ka waiho i ō mātou pānga whaiaro katoa ki te taha. Ka mihi mātou ki te Kīngi, me te inoi atu mō te ārahitanga i roto i ō mātou whakaaroarohanga, kia mōhio ai, kia whakaiti ai tā mātou whakahaere i ngā take o te Whare nei, mō te oranga, te maungārongo, me te aroha o Aotearoa. Amene.

[Almighty God, we give thanks for the blessings which have been bestowed on us. Laying aside all personal interests, we acknowledge the King and pray for guidance in our deliberations that we may conduct the affairs of this House with wisdom and humility, for the welfare, peace, and compassion of New Zealand. Amen.]

Parliament Hansard Report – Speaker’s Ruling — Oral Questions—Form of Questions – 001454

Source: New Zealand Parliament – Hansard

SPEAKER’S RULINGS

Oral Questions—Form of Questions

SPEAKER: Members, yesterday when I suggested to a member that she find another way of asking a question, I did not intend to suggest that members cannot ask the same question more than once. Parties have a limited number of oral questions allocated to them. If they wish to use that allocation asking the same question, there are certainly no restrictions to doing so. Speaker’s ruling 186/4 makes that clear.

Parliament Hansard Report – Wednesday, 13 November 2024 (continued on Thursday, 14 November 2024) – Volume 780 – 001453

Source: New Zealand Parliament – Hansard

Dr CARLOS CHEUNG (National—Mt Roskill): The people of New Zealand have spoken. Vaping is a serious issue and it is time for the Government to take action. I rise up this morning to support this Government’s work to get tough on vaping and particularly on youth vaping. This bill is a first step towards limiting youth vaping and addressing vaping issues.

Just now we had our previous contributor from the Labour Party, Ingrid Leary, mention how she is passionate about addressing vaping issues. But I want to emphasise that I haven’t seen any action in the past six years to address the issues, and now they say that we don’t care. But we are the Government who actually put this bill on the Table. So I don’t know what she was trying to say or what she was meaning, when saying that we are not taking action.

So let’s go back to the bill. The centrepiece of this bill is the complete ban on disposable vape devices. Also, it is important to recognise that this bill has a significant increase in fines for retailers caught cash-selling vapes to under-18s—from $10,000 to $100,000. It also introduces additional restrictions on the visibility of vaping products, and one of the best ones is banning new vape shops from operating near schools and early childhood centres.

During the submissions stage we received and considered submissions from 849 groups and individuals. We had the privilege of hearing 41 submitters both in person and by video conference. Because of them, we were able to strengthen this bill to serve its purpose. But I also want to mention some of the great ideas which are out of scope, including licensing all retailers, maybe a possibility of introducing density limits for specialist vape retailers, reducing the nicotine labels, and introducing plain packaging. Also, we heard feedback from local constituents and also from a lot of health foundations, especially the Asthma and Respiratory Foundation. They all agree that this bill is a positive step forward in fighting against youth vaping.

I believe that this bill is the first step towards limiting youth vaping and addressing vape issues. Also, we believe it is true that there is more work to do, and I’m looking forward to this House making more progress in due course. I commend this bill to the House.

Parliament Hansard Report – Smokefree Environments and Regulated Products Amendment Bill (No 2) — Second Reading – 001452

Source: New Zealand Parliament – Hansard

Dr CARLOS CHEUNG (National—Mt Roskill): The people of New Zealand have spoken. Vaping is a serious issue and it is time for the Government to take action. I rise up this morning to support this Government’s work to get tough on vaping and particularly on youth vaping. This bill is a first step towards limiting youth vaping and addressing vaping issues.

Just now we had our previous contributor from the Labour Party, Ingrid Leary, mention how she is passionate about addressing vaping issues. But I want to emphasise that I haven’t seen any action in the past six years to address the issues, and now they say that we don’t care. But we are the Government who actually put this bill on the Table. So I don’t know what she was trying to say or what she was meaning, when saying that we are not taking action.

So let’s go back to the bill. The centrepiece of this bill is the complete ban on disposable vape devices. Also, it is important to recognise that this bill has a significant increase in fines for retailers caught cash-selling vapes to under-18s—from $10,000 to $100,000. It also introduces additional restrictions on the visibility of vaping products, and one of the best ones is banning new vape shops from operating near schools and early childhood centres.

During the submissions stage we received and considered submissions from 849 groups and individuals. We had the privilege of hearing 41 submitters both in person and by video conference. Because of them, we were able to strengthen this bill to serve its purpose. But I also want to mention some of the great ideas which are out of scope, including licensing all retailers, maybe a possibility of introducing density limits for specialist vape retailers, reducing the nicotine labels, and introducing plain packaging. Also, we heard feedback from local constituents and also from a lot of health foundations, especially the Asthma and Respiratory Foundation. They all agree that this bill is a positive step forward in fighting against youth vaping.

I believe that this bill is the first step towards limiting youth vaping and addressing vape issues. Also, we believe it is true that there is more work to do, and I’m looking forward to this House making more progress in due course. I commend this bill to the House.

Parliament Hansard Report – Wednesday, 13 November 2024 – Volume 780 – 001451

Source: New Zealand Parliament – Hansard

Hon DAVID PARKER (Labour): Thank you, Mr Speaker. The New Zealand Labour Party supports the right of all private and public sector workers, including Defence Force civilian staff, to seek meaningful and reasonable pay increases. Civilian staff work in important roles, as the Minister of Defence has said, across our Defence Force, including for firefighting, and security services for military bases and the likes of Defence House and Pipitea House.

Invoking section 9(2) of the Defence Act is unusual and should only occur in exceptional circumstances. In the opinion of the New Zealand Labour Party, the circumstances we are facing here today are of the Government’s making. They chose to underfund parts of the Defence budget, which resulted in the New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) offering nothing of substance to civilian workers. It will not surprise many New Zealanders that faced with an offer of zero increase, they chose to instead issue a strike notice. Rather than addressing the root cause of this strike by enabling the New Zealand Defence Force to make a realistic offer to civilian staff, the Minister has instead escalated this dispute by invoking section 9(2) of the Defence Act.

This must be worsening the capacity problem within the NZDF. The NZDF are down at least 1,200 staff and, of course, are dealing with the sinking of the HMNZS Manawanui. Labour encourages the Government to financially support the NZDF to enable them to go back to the bargaining table with a real offer in order to avoid the long-term deployment of Defence Force members to tasks that are not part of their core roles.

I have a number of brief questions for the Minister, the first of which is: is it correct that the wage offer made prior to the strike notice was zero, and, if so, is the Minister able to inform the House of any prior instance of section 9(2) of the Defence Act having been utilised after a zero offer was made, leading to strike action?

Hon JUDITH COLLINS (Minister of Defence): Mr Speaker, thank you. I note the comments made by the Hon David Parker. The Defence Force was massively underfunded and massively under stress when we became the Government. We were able to secure, despite the very difficult fiscal circumstances, well over $450 million extra of operating costs in the Budget just passed. I am appalled that the former Minister does not understand about what a shocking state we were left with.

What I can say is that the Defence Force has been able to cut the massive attrition rates it has had. It is clear that this is an industrial dispute. The Defence Force is taking full responsibility to be able to deal with this situation. I will never leave Defence to be defenceless, like that previous Government did.

Hon KIERAN McANULTY (Labour): Point of order, Mr Speaker. The structures surrounding ministerial statements are quite clear, and Speaker’s ruling 150/1 clearly states that a Minister’s responsibility when asked a question is to address that question. It is not an opportunity to make another speech or to make a political comment.

SPEAKER: That is true, but that was a very politically motivated question, with all due respect, and I think it would be hard to say that the question was not addressed, given that it was funding that was mentioned straight up in the start of the question.

Hon DAVID PARKER (Labour): I ask again whether the Minister can inform the House as to whether there is any prior instance where this section has been used in the light of a strike notice after a zero percent wage offer.

Hon JUDITH COLLINS (Minister of Defence): Well, I’m not responsible for what that previous Government might have done with its resources or what was done under previous Ministers. What I can say is that I’ve been the Minister for a year and I have not had to use this power before, but I am certainly doing it now.

Hon DAVID PARKER (Labour): Has the Minister been advised by the Chief of Defence or the State Services Commission when the last wage increase was received by these workers and what the effect of inflation since has been in terms of their real wages?

Hon JUDITH COLLINS (Minister of Defence): No, I have not been informed of that, but I can say that I’m happy to say that after some excellent work done by the Minister of Finance, the inflation rate is dropping.

Hon DAVID PARKER (Labour): Are any of the roles that the New Zealand Defence Force will be filling vacancies or the consequence of voluntary redundancies, or are they all as a consequence of the strike notice?

Hon JUDITH COLLINS (Minister of Defence): Well, I don’t have the full details of who is on strike, but I can say that it’s hard for people to be on strike if they’ve already made themselves redundant. So I’d expect that they will all be people who are currently employed by Defence Force doing valuable work, but it is work that needs to be done. Whether it’s by people who are civilians or it’s people in uniform, it will be done.

Hon DAVID PARKER (Labour): Supplementary—it’s probably not a supplementary, is it, sir. But another question to the Minister, if I may, sir, is: has the Minister sought any advice from the State Services Commission as to whether the negotiations with the civilian workforce are proceeding in a manner that the State Services Commission would have thought is normal?

Hon JUDITH COLLINS (Minister of Defence): No. It’s now the Public Service Commission and, no, this is an operational matter. I have full confidence in the Chief of the Defence Force and his leadership team. I expect them to get on with their job.

Hon DAVID PARKER (Labour): Is the Minister confident that she has followed all of the relevant provisions in the Employment Relations Act on when and how employers can replace striking workers when she invokes section 9(2) of the Defence Act?

Hon JUDITH COLLINS (Minister of Defence): Yes, I’m fully aware that we have followed the law. In fact, I’ve had advice on that and, as one would expect, I have read my advice and taken it on board.

Hon DAVID PARKER (Labour): Is she surprised that the workers issued a strike notice after a zero percent wage increase?

Hon JUDITH COLLINS (Minister of Defence): It’s not for me to be surprised or not. It’s simply a fact, and my job is to make sure that Defence is not left defenceless.

Parliament Hansard Report – Karakia/Prayers – 001450

Source: New Zealand Parliament – Hansard

WEDNESDAY, 13 NOVEMBER 2024

The Speaker took the Chair at 2 p.m.

KARAKIA/PRAYERS

SPEAKER: Almighty God, we give thanks for the blessings which have been bestowed on us. Laying aside all personal interests, we acknowledge the King and pray for guidance in our deliberations that we may conduct the affairs of this House with wisdom, justice, mercy, and humility for the welfare and peace of New Zealand. Amen.

Parliament Hansard Report – Petitions, Papers, Select Committee Reports, and Introduction of Bills – 001449

Source: New Zealand Parliament – Hansard

PETITIONS, PAPERS, SELECT COMMITTEE REPORTS, AND INTRODUCTION OF BILLS

SPEAKER: Three petitions have been delivered to the Clerk for presentation.

CLERK:

  • Petition of Ihorangi Reweti Peters requesting that the House implement all recommendations made to the Government in the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care reports
  • Petition of Ross Hoole requesting that the House raise the maximum age of a child in section 132 of the Crimes Act 1961 from under 12 years to under 14 years of age
  • Petition of Kenneth Mulholland requesting that the House urge the Minister of Local Government to appoint a Commission to replace Wellington City Council.

SPEAKER: Those petitions stand referred to the Petitions Committee. Six papers have been delivered by Ministers.

CLERK:

  • 2024 Annual reports for the:
    • Health Research Council of New Zealand
    • Herenga ā Nuku Aotearoa, the Outdoor Access Commission
    • New Zealand Trade and Enterprise
    • Tourism New Zealand
  • 2024-28 Statement of intent for the Health Research Council of New Zealand
  • 2024-25 Statement of performance expectations for the Health Research Council of New Zealand.

SPEAKER: Those papers are published under the authority of the House. Six select committee reports have been delivered for presentation.

CLERK:

  • Report of the Environment Committee on the review briefing on the 2022/23 annual review of Predator Free 2050 Limited
  • Report of the Finance and Expenditure Committee on the report of the Controller and Auditor-General, Making infrastructure investment decisions quickly
  • Report of the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee on the petition of Rajeev Nair
  • Report of the Justice Committee on the inquiry into the 2023 General Election, Report of the Controller and Auditor-General, General Election 2023: Independent review of counting errors, and Petition of Daniel Bond
  • Reports of the Petitions Committee on the:
    • petition of Alison White, and the
    • petition of Captain William Stafford.

SPEAKER: The inquiry on the 2023 election, the review briefings, and the report of the Auditor-General are set down for consideration. No bills have been introduced.

Parliament Hansard Report – Tuesday, 12 November 2024 – Volume 780 – 001448

Source: New Zealand Parliament – Hansard

Rt Hon CHRISTOPHER LUXON (Prime Minister): Thank you, Mr Speaker. Ngā kura mōrehu, kua ngaro, haere atu rā. Ngā kura mōrehu. E whakawhaiti nei. Kei ngā rangatira. Tēnā koutou katoa.

[Treasured survivors, those that have passed, farewell. Treasured survivors that have gathered here. To the esteemed leaders. Greetings.]

I’d like to welcome you all here today on what is a significant, a sorrowful, but a very important day for you and for all of New Zealand. I would also like to acknowledge all those who are watching and listening in all around the country. I know that this day has been a long time coming. [Interruption]

A disturbance took place in the gallery, and a member of the public was removed on the instruction of the Speaker.

SPEAKER: Might I express to everyone in the gallery our disappointment that your day has begun with such an unacceptable interruption. We know that you come here with goodwill, having put up with so much in your lives and how important today is. Accordingly, I’ll ask the Rt Hon Prime Minister to begin his contribution once again.

Rt Hon CHRISTOPHER LUXON: Well, I would like to welcome you all here today, as I said, on what is a significant, sorrowful, but very important day for you and for our country.

Today, I stand before you as the representative of not only this Government but of all the Governments that have gone before us, to offer a formal and unreserved apology for the abuse that you suffered while in State care, churches, and other faith-based places. It was horrific, it was heartbreaking, it was wrong, and it should never have happened. For many of you, it changed the course of your life, and for that, the Government must take responsibility. I have said it before, but I thank you again for telling New Zealand with clarity and with honesty what happened to you.

The Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in State Care was the largest, the longest, and the most complex public inquiry ever held in New Zealand. More than 2,400 of you were incredibly brave and shared your experiences of the abuse that you suffered while in State care, churches, and other faith-based places—places where you should have been safe and treated with dignity and respect and compassion, but instead you were subjected to horrific abuse and neglect and, in some cases, torture.

In 16 devastating volumes, page after page, your stories left many of us stunned that this could have happened here in New Zealand, but not you. You knew the truth because you lived it, and you have waited and waited for people to start listening to you. Now New Zealand has listened. Words do matter and I say these words with sincerity: I have read your stories and I believe you.

It is my duty as the current Prime Minister to formally recognise that the abuse that you suffered should have never happened—recognition that is long overdue. Today, I’m apologising on behalf of the Government to everyone who suffered abuse, harm, and neglect while in State care, to make this apology to all survivors on behalf of my own and previous Governments.

You deserved so much better and I am deeply sorry that New Zealand did not do better by you. I am sorry that you were not believed when you came forward to report your abuse. I am sorry that many bystanders—staff, volunteers, and carers—turned a blind eye and failed to stop or report abuse. I am sorry that the State’s oversight of people in care was so poor. I am sorry that many abusers were not made to face justice, which meant that other people experienced abuse that could have been prevented. I am sorry that the State did not act quickly and boldly enough to put much better protection in place for people in all care locations, and that those acting on behalf of the Crown lost sight of you: the people behind the claims.

Everyone in care was vulnerable to abuse, but some people suffered even more because of who they were. Many Māori, Pacific, Deaf, and disabled people suffered harsher treatment than others. Māori and Pacific children suffered racial discrimination and disconnection from their families, language, and culture. Blind children were denied access to braille books. Deaf children were punished for using sign language. Children and vulnerable adults with intellectual disabilities were not supported to learn or communicate. Some children and adults in care were targeted because of their sexual orientation or gender identity. Some mothers were pressured or coerced by the State to give up their babies for adoption, often leading to long years of mental suffering for them and their children who they were forced to give up.

To all of you, I am sorry. I acknowledge the abuse had a devastating impact not only on you but also the people closest to you—your partners, children, and grandchildren.

Some parents were told that putting their children into State care was the right thing to do; very often, it was not. To those parents, I am sorry that we did not care for your children as if they were our own.

To those of you who were tortured at Lake Alice—young, alone, and subjected to unimaginable pain—I am deeply sorry.

I’d like to acknowledge those who are not alive to hear this apology: today, we feel you are here with us, and I extend this apology to you, your families and whānau.

I want to acknowledge those of you who struggled to get help from Government agencies when you came forward to report your abuse. This has meant you have had to re-live your trauma over and over again. Agencies should have done better and must commit to doing so in the future.

Many of you were denied knowledge of what happened to you because record-keeping during your time in care was so poor or deliberately inaccurate. Your own personal information was often withheld, destroyed, lost, wrong, or incomplete. Often there was no record of your origins, your family and whānau, the harm that you experienced, the complaints that you made, your medical treatments, or what social workers said about you. I am sorry.

I stand alongside the chief executives from seven Government agencies who have, this morning, apologised for the failings and omissions by their own agencies and departments. Some faith-based organisations are making their own apologies. I strongly encourage them all to do so, to honour the survivors who were abused while in their care. The Government has written to church leaders to let them know our expectation is that they will do the right thing and contribute to the redress process.

No apology can right the wrongs of the past. Some of you may feel my words count for little, after so long and so much hurt. But one of my hopes is that today, with this apology and this acknowledgement of your burden, it becomes a little lighter for you.

Clearly, words must be accompanied by actions. For me, there are two big lessons from the royal commission of inquiry that we must act on quickly and we must act on thoroughly. First, we must do the right thing by you and provide you with the support that you need. Second, we must do all we can to prevent abuse happening in the future.

It is important to note that not all care was abusive and certainly not all caregivers. There are many New Zealanders who have formed loving and lifelong bonds with the foster families who have opened their doors and hearts to them. I do want to thank those who have provided loving and appropriate care in the past, and those who continue to do so today. The royal commission itself said that by 1999 there had been improvements to the care system. But we must do better; we must do better at improving the experience of those in care, and we must do better at ensuring fewer people end up in state care in the first place.

The royal commission made 138 recommendations for change. The Government is carefully considering each of those recommendations. I am heartened at the words of support from the Leader of the Opposition and also the other parties in this Parliament to put politics to one side and to work together to achieve lasting change.

Today I want to provide you with some more detail about our intentions. The Government’s response is focused in three areas: firstly, acknowledging the abuse through the tabling of the report and this formal apology, secondly supporting survivors, and thirdly, preventing abuse from happening in the future. I am pleased to announce today the Government has completed or started work on 28 recommendations in the report. To demonstrate our commitment to change, this afternoon a bill that will introduce a range of measures to improve the safety of children and vulnerable adults in state care, will have its first reading here in Parliament.

I know that financial redress is important to many of you, and no amount of money will ever make up for what you have endured, but today I want to provide you with some details around the next steps. Many of you, understandably, do not want to engage with the current redress system. Some parts of it are 20 years old and it can take up to five years for your claims to be addressed. However, there are also 3,500 of you who are engaging with the current system so today I am announcing the Government will invest an additional $32 million to increase capacity in the current system while we work on the new redress system. This funding will increase resources and help ensure the system is more responsive to your needs now. But I want to assure you today that it is our intention to have a new single redress system operating next year.

While financial redress is important to some of you, others of you are looking for easier access to support services, so the Government will establish a $2 million fund that will support organisations that are already working well with you as survivors. This will help you to navigate and access the support that you need more easily.

One of the most important things we can do in light of the royal commission of inquiry is to improve the safeguards to prevent the abuse of children and vulnerable adults in care. The system has already improved markedly since the 50-year period to 1999 that the royal commission focused on. Back then, many people in care were in large institutions. Today, the vast majority are in the care of households or small-scale, community-based care places. There have been improvements in areas like professional standards, staff training and vetting, and complaints procedures. But the royal commission made a number of recommendations around further improvements, which the Government will carefully consider. We have started the process to remove the ability to strip search children in care, provide new search powers for people visiting youth justice facilities, and to strengthen restrictions for people working with young children. We will also change the Crimes Act to better recognise disabled people and will improve record keeping in government agencies. I would like to thank the other political parties for their support in progressing this bill today.

I know that raising public awareness to help prevent future abuse is important to you as, for decades, many of you suffered in silence. Today I am announcing a National Remembrance Day will be held on 12 November next year to mark the one-year anniversary of this apology. This will provide us with an opportunity to stop and to reflect on what you endured and to ensure we are doing all we can to prevent future abuse.

Today I can also tell you we will start work on removing, immediately, memorials including street names, public amenities, and public honours of proven perpetrators. We will also work with local authorities to honour and care for unmarked graves located on sites that were places of care in New Zealand.

Before I close, I want to say that to have hope, however bleak your circumstances, is an important part of being human. I know there are survivors among you who have managed to overcome what happened to you and have gone on to lead full lives and have ensured abuse was never part of your own children’s lives. I applaud breaking that cycle that too often hangs like a curse over families. It does not mean you have forgotten or forgiven what occurred. However, you have been able to pierce the darkness with the light of hope and work through what you endured, to take opportunities and find pleasure in life.

My hope is that today allows more of you to find a little more light, because while today is about your past it is also about your future. It’s also about the future of others who may find themselves in care. They will have a better experience thanks to your voice, your courage, and your persistence. It is on all of us now to do all that we can to ensure that abuse that should never have been accepted, no longer occurs. That will be an enduring legacy of your contribution to changing the system, and this and future Governments’ commitment to implementing that change.

I would like to say again, and to thank all of those who told your stories: you have been heard, and you have been believed. You have helped achieve what you must have wished for yourselves: better protection to prevent the suffering of vulnerable and voiceless people. I would like to acknowledge those of you—the wounded healers—who despite the trauma that you have been through yourselves have helped to advocate for other survivors. That is selfless.

I thank the royal commission staff and commissioners; I thank all those continuing to work on this response. I would like to thank the Leader of the Opposition, Chris Hipkins, and all of the other political parties who have worked with us on this day.

I also want to thank those many, many good people in social services who go out, day after difficult day, to try to help to protect those who are in danger, to strengthen those who are weak, and to support those who are vulnerable.

Finally, to you, the survivors of abuse in care. I hope this apology may help your healing. What happened is part of your life story, but not the only part. This apology, which you may each take as personal, is now part of your story, too. I would like to end with a karakia from Waihoroi Shortland:

Your truth we are challenged to uphold,

Your courage we are bound to honour,

And your right to be heard we receive with privilege.

No reira, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou katoa.

Parliament Hansard Report – Karakia/Prayers – 001447

Source: New Zealand Parliament – Hansard

TUESDAY, 12 NOVEMBER 2024

The Speaker took the Chair at 11.30 a.m.

KARAKIA/PRAYERS

SPEAKER: Almighty God, we give thanks for the blessings which have been bestowed on us. Laying aside all personal interests, we acknowledge the King and pray for guidance in our deliberations, that we may conduct the affairs of this House with wisdom, justice, mercy, and humility for the welfare and peace of New Zealand. Amen.

This is an important occasion and we’re just going to pause for a few minutes as there’s been a little bit of congestion in getting people in to the galleries. So we’ll just take five minutes to make sure that happens appropriately.

OK, it looks like we’re about full. Could we just have silence in the galleries from this point. Thank you.