Does New Zealand have low wages? Yes.

Source: Council Of Trade Unions (CTU) – Press Release/Statement:

Headline: Does New Zealand have low wages? Yes.

It is often said that New Zealand has a low-wage economy in comparison to other high-income countries such as those in their club, the OECD. Business NZ recently disputed that. But there is strong evidence that New Zealand does have low wages.

– –

Kiwirail and union members show how good collective bargaining can be

Source: Council Of Trade Unions (CTU) – Press Release/Statement:

Headline: Kiwirail and union members show how good collective bargaining can be

Council of Trade Unions Secretary Sam Huggard extended his congratulations to Kiwirail and Rail and Maritime Union (RMTU) members today for reaching a constructive and progressive deal yesterday to lift pay and work in partnership. Mr Huggard says this deal disproves recent scaremongering by employers like the Ports of Tauranga that Multi Employer Collective Agreements hamper business.

– –

Expertise of clinicians needs to be valued in health sector

Source: Council Of Trade Unions (CTU) – Press Release/Statement:

Headline: Expertise of clinicians needs to be valued in health sector

The Council of Trade Unions Secretary Sam Huggard said today that unions were supporting a public health system that listened to and valued the advice of clinicians, in response to the Association of Salaried Medical Specialist’s concerns about our pathology services.

– –

What confidence can we have in “business confidence”?

Source: Council Of Trade Unions (CTU) – Press Release/Statement:

Headline: What confidence can we have in “business confidence”?

‘Business confidence’ is falling and we should be very concerned, we are told. But is ‘business confidence’ really falling and is it anything more than an opinion poll of some chief executives as to what they think of the Government of the day, or their impression (which may not be any more accurate than yours or mine) of where the economy is going?

– –

Budget health analysis shows reverse in downwards trend, but much more needed

Source: Council Of Trade Unions (CTU) – Press Release/Statement:

Headline: Budget health analysis shows reverse in downwards trend, but much more needed

Council of Trade Unions Economist Dr Bill Rosenberg and the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists Director of Policy Lyndon Keene today jointly released detailed analysis of the 2018/2019 health budget which shows $2.5 billion would need to be put in to the next Government budget to both meet that year’s needs and restore funding to 2009/2010 levels.

– –

The Budget: bleeding stopped, patient’s condition still serious

Source: Council Of Trade Unions (CTU) – Press Release/Statement:

Headline: The Budget: bleeding stopped, patient’s condition still serious

In memoriam: This is the 200th CTU Economic Bulletin. It was founded by my predecessor, Peter Conway, CTU economist and then CTU Secretary, who wrote the first 101 issues. He died just three years ago, on 9 June 2015. We still miss his wisdom, values, activism, music and friendship.

– –

Holidays Act changes to be worked through between unions, business and Government

Source: Council Of Trade Unions (CTU) – Press Release/Statement:

Headline: Holidays Act changes to be worked through between unions, business and Government

The Council of Trade Unions President Richard Wagstaff said today that he was looking forward to working with business and Government on a review of the Holidays Act to ensure working people are fully and properly paid what they legally earn.

– –

Payroll needs to recognise that parenting is skilled work too

Source: Council Of Trade Unions (CTU) – Press Release/Statement:

Headline: Payroll needs to recognise that parenting is skilled work too

The Council of Trade Unions said that new research released this morning by public policy researchers at Motu shows parenthood is undervalued by employers as skilled but unpaid work, with mothers being impacted by a lifelong ‘parenthood penalty’. Secretary Sam Huggard said the research illustrates how undervaluing what is perceived as unpaid ‘women’s work’ has an interaction with paid work, and strongly contributes to the gender pay gap.

– –

Government facing over two and a half billion health funding gap

Source: Council Of Trade Unions (CTU) – Press Release/Statement:

Headline: Government facing over two and a half billion health funding gap

New figures released today by Council of Trade Unions Economist Dr Bill Rosenberg and the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists Director of Policy Lyndon Keene show the health funding gap since 2009/2010 has grown to $2.7 billion. This amount would be needed in Thursday’s Budget to fund services to the same level they were supported in 2010, and pay for new initiatives.

– –

Busting the Oil and Gas industry’s Alternative Facts about Jacinda’s offshore oil exploration ban.

Source: Greenpeace New Zealand – Press Release/Statement:

Headline: Busting the Oil and Gas industry’s Alternative Facts about Jacinda’s offshore oil exploration ban.

After Jacinda’s historic announcement that brought an end to new offshore oil and gas exploration, we’ve been hearing a lot from the industry about how the sky is about to fall in. Fun fact: it isn’t. But just in case  you find yourself having a heated debate with someone around the dinner table, we’ve put together some debate points to help you.

Alt Fact:  If we stop producing oil here we’ll just have to import more oil from overseas.

Truth: New Zealand’s vehicles already run almost entirely on imported oil.  

The fuel we use to fill our cars at the petrol pump is imported from overseas, so won’t be affected by this decision. Virtually all of our relatively small oil production is exported. Sounds weird, but that’s how the global oil market works. According to the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE):

New Zealand’s locally-produced oil is generally exported because of its high quality and therefore high value on the international market. Australia purchases most of this oil.

The Middle East tends to be our largest source of crude oil (over half generally comes from there). Russia and Asia are also significant trade sources.

The real alternative to importing oil is more electric trains, buses, cars, trucks, and bikes powered by renewable electricity and biofuels – not more oil drilling. By using more clean, locally-produced energy, we will also reduce our current multi-billion dollar oil deficit, which comes about because we import more oil than we export.  

Alt Fact: Stopping oil and gas exploration will lead to more climate emissions.

Truth: Any oil and gas we keep in the ground is oil and gas that can’t be burnt and can’t increase global emissions.

In reality, saying that new fossil fuels are out of bounds creates certainty for investors to put their money behind the alternatives – clean technologies like solar, wind, geothermal and battery storage.

Alt Fact: When the gas runs out, industry will burn more coal.

Truth: Clean energy is both technologically available and cost-effective, so we don’t need to replace one fossil fuel with another.

Smarter combinations of renewables, demand management, battery storage and electric transport are transforming the way we use energy. It means we don’t actually need outdated, dirty fuels like oil, gas, and coal anymore. Professor Ralph Sims at Massey University has recently shown that there is no point exploring for more gas, because efficiency improvements and the switch to renewables mean we can cover most of our energy needs without fossil fuels. Using the gas we already have more efficiently also means we’ve got enough left over to power the things that take a bit more time to transition.

Alt Fact: Exporting New Zealand gas to developing countries will lower global emissions.

Truth: We’re far better off investing in clean energy and exporting our expertise in renewables.

The idea that New Zealand can export gas to developing countries to replace their use of coal really doesn’t have legs.New Zealand isn’t currently set up to process gas into LNG so that it can be exported. Doing that would require a several billion dollar investment in new gas-processing infrastructure, which will take years. Why spend all that money supporting outdated, carbon-intensive technology when we could be using it to deploy modern, carbon-free energy instead?

Alt Fact: Oil and gas is one of the backbones of our economy and employs 11,000 people, whose jobs are destroyed by the move to stop new offshore exploration.

Truth: Economies thrive with long term stability. Starting the clean energy transition now means no 80s-style economic shock, and long-term security for the clean energy industry.

Oil and gas employs around 4,300 people directly and it’s really important that these workers and the communities that depend on this industry are supported to find sustainable livelihoods in other industries. The people with the best gauge of whether a decision is good or bad for workers are the trade unions that represent them. Importantly, the NZ Council of Trade Unions has welcomed the Government’s decision, which provides a long-term signal to the oil industry that they must now wind down and prioritise a transition plan for their workers. They say:

“The whole point of a just transition is that actually, we know change is coming, it’s inevitable, and we are going to create high-paying sustainable jobs that match people’s skills. You’d almost think from the reaction from the oil and gas industry that the rug was being pulled out from under working people overnight. The Government and the union movement have been very clear that a transition plan, particularly for affected regions is the right way to go.”

Let’s not forget that the energy transition is also an enormous economic and job opportunity. Clean energy produces four times more jobs than the oil industry. In the US, solar jobs are growing as much as 12 times faster than the rest of the economy. In New Zealand, clean energy could provide 25,000 new jobs. A recent Westpac report found that taking steps to address climate change now will save the New Zealand economy $30 billion dollars, compared to delaying our response.


Alt Fact: The lights will go out and energy will cost more.

Truth:  Oil and gas cost money – but sunshine and wind are free! Renewable energy is already cheap and has the potential to be much much cheaper.

Solar and wind power have dropped so dramatically in cost that they are already competing with fossil fuels and are poised to undercut new fossil energy in a couple of years.There are no input costs for wind and solar energy. This means that, while we need to buy the gas for a gas-fired power plant to generate electricity, the inputs for renewable energy – sunlight and wind – are free. As a result, they replace more expensive production in the electricity market, lowering wholesale electricity prices. This is good for consumers but, unsurprisingly, upsets the producers of dirty energy like gas.

In fact one of the biggest threats to energy security is climate change itself. Extreme weather destroys infrastructure and leads to power outages, such as the recent storms that have knocked out power for thousands of households across the country.

Alt Fact: We shouldn’t wind down oil and gas until we have clean energy to replace it.

Truth:  Saying no to future gas is vital to getting more clean energy into the system.  

The opportunities, technology, and supply of renewable energy already exist for New Zealand to start a direct transition away from all fossil fuels now. Studies from the U.S. show that increasing the availability of gas actually has the perverse effect of delaying renewable energy deployment. That’s because, new gas capacity directly competes with renewables. If there’s a chance that the market will be flooded with cheap gas, it makes building renewables a risky investment. Better to create certainty for investors that renewables are the way to go, by making new gas off-limits.

Alt Fact: Restricting oil and gas supply is a waste of time – we need to tackle at the demand side.

Truth:  We need to address both supply and demand if we’re going to achieve the necessary cut in carbon emissions.

Market forces are driven by scarcity, which means that when there is an abundance of gas available, the price goes down, incentivising industry and the public to use more gas.  When there is less gas available the price goes up, so industry and people use less gas and instead seek out alternatives. Supply does affect demand – and the oil and gas industry know this very well. They’re simply pointing the finger at people like you and me, in order to go on denying their role in reducing harmful climate emissions. As above, the promise of abundant gas supplies discourages investment in other forms of energy, like renewables. But, by signalling an end to new oil and gas exploration, we increase the need for clean energy replacements and stimulate development of those industries. Tackling climate change pollution at both the supply and demand side of energy is vital to success.  

 

– –