Green Party calls for conscience vote on Treaty Principles Bill

Source: Green Party

The Green Party has written to the Speaker of the House requesting he enable a personal vote on the Treaty Principles Bill.

“Tens of thousands are mobilising across the country against a divisive waste of time cooked up in secret by three men,” says Green Co-Leader, Chlöe Swarbrick.

“It’s time for the 123 Members of this Parliament to take personal, individual responsibility for whether the Treaty Principles Bill nonsense goes any further.

“During the election campaign, National MPs told the public they would not support this Bill. Christopher Luxon now keeps saying that the party will definitely vote it down if it gets to Second Reading. The Prime Minister is telling us that he intends to whip his MPs to vote differently at First Reading to what they campaigned on a year ago.

“That could mean our country’s precious energy and focus being poured into this imported, divisive culture war for months as this plays out at Select Committee. But that’s not inevitable. If MPs were free to vote with their conscience, I am confident many would align with regular New Zealanders, and put this rubbish in the bin where it belongs,” says Chlöe Swarbrick.

Govt move to exclude journalist risks chilling effect

Source: Green Party

The Green Party is alarmed by the Government’s move to exclude a journalist from covering this week’s apology for the survivors of abuse in state and faith-based care.

“When a journalist is barred from doing their job, just because they asked the Prime Minister difficult questions, it sets a dangerous precedent,” says the Green Party’s Media and Communications spokesperson Hūhana Lyndon.

“Aaron Smale is a highly respected journalist who has rigorously covered issues around the abuse in state and faith-based care. As a society that values the role of the fourth estate, we should value the work of journalists like Aaron, because it helps us take a critical look at where we have gone wrong and how we may move forward. 

“We all know that Christopher Luxon doesn’t like it when journalists persist with tough questions. But it’s another thing altogether to place a ban on such journalists simply for doing their job.

“It demonstrates a lack of understanding of, and tolerance for, the critical role that media plays in holding those in public office to account, on behalf of New Zealanders.

“This is likely to create a chilling effect on other journalists who may be wary of asking probing questions of the Prime Minister or Government in future.

“Barring a leading journalist from an important event like this speaks to this Government’s lack of accountability. It is something we might expect in Putin’s Russia, not 21st century Aotearoa New Zealand.

“Let’s stand up for transparency and accountability by Government, and make it clear that our country does not punish journalists for doing their job,” says Hūhana Lyndon.

Without action, an apology will be empty air

Source: Green Party

For tomorrow’s apology to survivors of abuse in state and faith-based care to hold any water, the Government must not pursue the same policies that drove the abuse in the first place.

“An apology without accountability – or worse, actively perpetuating the same harms – is nothing more than empty air” says the Green Party’s Spokesperson for Children, Kahurangi Carter.

“This Government has a responsibility to ensure that no one ever again suffers the horrific abuses these survivors have. The Government must fully implement all 138 recommendations which resulted from the Inquiry, honour the principles of Te Tiriti, and critically, stop the boot camp programmes that perpetuate colonial tools of control.

“The Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care provided us with harrowing testimony from survivors as well as invaluable insight into how we failed as a society and how we must change. The recommendations for how to address this legacy of abuse are clear. But what’s also clear is that the Government’s policies are going in a different direction.

“Labelling children and young people as serious offenders and sending them to boot camps while removing Treaty provisions in the Oranga Tamariki Act is resorting to the very patterns that drove the abuse detailed in the Inquiry. These rangatahi are among the most neglected, abused, and vulnerable in our society – the last thing they need is more punishment and cultural dislocation.

“The Government is unapologetic for pursuing the same policies that harmed the very survivors they are this week apologising to. This is an affront to approximately 250,000 survivors.

“Without actioning the Inquiry’s recommendations, history is doomed to repeat itself, entrenching the cycle of abuse against our most vulnerable who have been disproportionately affected by abuse in state and faith-based care. Māori, Pasifika, Deaf, disabled, those experiencing mental distress, impoverished and Rainbow tamariki have borne the brunt of this abuse.

“The Green Party would ensure that the lessons of the abuse in care inquiry are taken on board by stopping boot camps and replacing youth residences with local community-based support for rangatahi and their whānau.

“We acknowledge and thank all those survivors, whānau, hapū, iwi, communities and support networks who advocated and told their stories throughout the Inquiry,” says Kahurangi Carter.

The Green Party petition to stop the bootcamps can be found here: Ditch the Bootcamps – action.greens.org.nz

Urgent wake-up call on climate

Source: Green Party

The Climate Change Commission’s latest advice indicates Aotearoa needs to be stepping up on climate action. 

“Climate action is more urgent than ever, but this Government is taking Aotearoa backwards,” says Green Party Spokesperson for Foreign Affairs, Teanau Tuiono.

“The Government needs to start taking our pledges under the Paris Agreement seriously and increase our Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC).The Commission’s advice shows that domestic emissions reduction efforts can take us a long way in meeting these pledges – if we put in the work now.”

“Delay is the new denial, and the longer the Government kicks the can down the road the worse things will be for our tamariki and mokopuna.

“We urge the Government to step up with bold, meaningful targets that match the scale of this crisis and start working on achieving emissions reductions at home that we know are completely possible. 

“The Commission makes it clear that reaching our international climate targets through decarbonising our industry, transport and energy is well within reach. However, this Government has put us in reverse when we need to be moving forward at full speed on this path.

“An approach which takes a high level of ambition towards reducing our domestic emissions is not only more equitable, but it would open up billions of dollars in clean energy investments, and directly benefit New Zealanders. 

“By making the right choices today at home, we can live up to our commitments under the Paris Agreement and set a Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) that positions New Zealand as a credible and consistent climate leader. But we have to get going now. 

“With our Pacific Island neighbours bearing the brunt of climate impacts, New Zealand has a duty to lead by example. The Prime Minister’s statements at CHOGM need to be backed by concrete action. 

“The time for uncertainty has passed. This report shows that there are huge gains to be made – for both our country and the world – if New Zealand takes bold, clear actions now.” says Teanau Tuiono.

Green MP’s Meme-ber’s Bill set to save the world

Source: Green Party

Break out the punchlines and dust off your meme folder: Green Party MP Kahurangi Carter’s Copyright (Parody and Satire) Amendment Bill was pulled from the Ballot yesterday.

“Satire is more than a joke – it’s also a way of making sense of a world that can sometimes feel dark and heavy,” says Kahurangi Carter.

“This Bill is designed to provide space for creators, artists, commentators, and everyday Kiwis to poke a little fun without breaking the law – or the bank. 

“In New Zealand, we’re renowned for our love of spoofs, parodies, and dark humour. But right now, our dry wit can get us into hot water. Artists are currently vulnerable to legal threat for making satire.

“Given the changing cultural landscape, with the prominence of social media, it’s clear we need to bring our law up to date, and into line with the laws of other developed countries, including Australia, the United States, Belgium, France, the Netherlands, Spain, and Germany.

“It’s a little ironic that we, a nation of quintessential dry-humour lovers, can’t lampoon and parody with the rest of the world without risk of breaching copyright. And yes, that includes making proper memes.

“This Bill protects artists’ right to freedom of speech, and in doing so helps protect our democracy. Humour is essential to a thriving democracy, with both parody and satire playing a critical role in public discourse. If it passes, big companies won’t be able to sue artists for being cool and funny.

“We’re thrilled to be able to champion in a new era, one where creatives and artists can reflect our culture with a bit of irony, wit and perhaps even the occasional tongue-in-cheek jab.

“I call on parties across the House to get behind this Bill at its First Reading early next year.” 

“I’m also looking forward to the enthusiastic support of the Free Speech Union” says Kahurangi Carter.

Notes:

  • The Copyright (Parody and Satire) Amendment Bill seeks to amend the Copyright Act 1994.
  • The purpose of this Bill is to introduce into New Zealand copyright law the authority to use a copyright work for the purpose of parody or satire.
  • It brings New Zealand’s law in line with the laws of other developed countries, including Australia, the United States, Belgium, France, the Netherlands, Spain, and Germany.
  • It also allows for a much wider interpretation of current copyright law in favour of the public wishing to use copyright works through parody or satire to promote an issue freely under our understanding of freedom of speech.
  • The amendment recognises the fact that our current copyright legislation is very much outdated in the 21st century world of Internet accessibility and freedom of information. The availability and forms of copyright works now take on far more forms than when the Copyright Act 1994 was first written, and New Zealand must adapt to this changing world.

Parliament Hansard Report – Thursday, 7 November 2024 – Volume 779 – 001445

Source: New Zealand Parliament – Hansard

Question No. 6—Health

6. Hon Dr AYESHA VERRALL (Labour) to the Associate Minister of Health: Does she stand by her statement that “Once my office was fully staffed, operational issues regarding management of information was remedied”; and, if so, how was she unaware until yesterday that she never released an unredacted version of the document to the requestor?

Hon CASEY COSTELLO (Associate Minister of Health): Yes. I reject the member’s assertion that I was unaware an unredacted version had not been released, because she has mischaracterised my personal explanation from yesterday, and I would point out that while the member continues to fixate on old news and trying to find links where there aren’t any, this Government is getting on with actually supporting smokers to quit cigarettes through practical tools and approaches. Contrary to the previous Government’s approach, I am interested in the views of front-line quit-smoking providers—who understand the challenges for long-term addicted smokers—rather than implementing headline-catching, misdirected slogans.

Hon Dr Ayesha Verrall: Does she stand by the decision she made to redact the phrases “nicotine is as harmful as caffeine” and that tobacco control measures amount to “nanny state nonsense”?

Hon CASEY COSTELLO: The Official Information Act provides for withholding information to maintain the effective conduct of public affairs through the free and frank expression of opinions. I have been clear in this House that the document in question refers to statements, policies, and positions of the New Zealand First Party, and when given by a Minister to officials, it is not unreasonable to think that there are free and frank statements within it, as well as public policy positions that are under active consideration.

Hon Dr Ayesha Verrall: Does she understand now that she withheld that information under a section of the Act that only applies to information tendered by officials, and, if so, she should be able to say who wrote it or who gave her that document?

Hon CASEY COSTELLO: I have not received any notice about a complaint being made about information released. The member could speculate about anything, but has no grounds for the assertion. I note that if the member were concerned about redactions, the information was received by her in March this year, and no complaint has been made, as far as I am aware.

Hon Dr Ayesha Verrall: Supplementary.

SPEAKER: One more.

Hon Dr Ayesha Verrall: Why did she claim on Tuesday that her acting contrary to the law was the result of short-term operational issues, when the fact is she continued to inappropriately withhold information while being under investigation by the Ombudsman well into June?

Hon CASEY COSTELLO: Yet again, I have not received a complaint in relation to the document in question. So the member can make the assertion, but, frankly, she is not qualified to make that assessment. There is active consideration, as she’s fully aware, around the Official Information Act management.

Rt Hon Winston Peters: Could the Minister please explain to the original questioner, very slowly, that one requestor already had an unredacted copy, which was leaked to him and, no doubt, her?

Hon CASEY COSTELLO: Yes. This whole issue arose from a leaked document, for which the ministry has offered apologies.

Hon Dr Ayesha Verrall: Does she understand that whether there’s an Ombudsman complaint or not, she needs to be able to explain the decisions she made, according to the Act?

Hon CASEY COSTELLO: Yes. All of the explanations around redaction have been made. There is active consideration around policy positions, which is covered for under the Official Information Act, and that has been fully responded to.

Rt Hon Winston Peters: Can I ask the Minister as to whether or not in this inquiry she expects to get the information from the original questioner that she had already received an unredacted copy, and what is all this nonsense, therefore, about?

Hon CASEY COSTELLO: What I can say is that I apologise to New Zealanders who are trying to give up smoking and are being distracted by an Opposition who has absolutely no ability to understand what important work needs to be undertaken. The previous Government failed to deliver a proper, effective policy position, and we are fixing it.

Hon Dr Ayesha Verrall: So this week are we going to have that sort of theatrics, or are we going to have what we had last week—

SPEAKER: No, no, just ask a question.

Hon Dr Ayesha Verrall: Is she going to continue to blame everyone but herself—officials, the Opposition, the media—or will she fess up and just say how the document ended up in her office?

Hon CASEY COSTELLO: Could I have the question again, because I missed it with the noise?

SPEAKER: I think a fair warning has been given to the House about people making a noise or whatever during a question being asked, so just don’t push it any further. Would Dr Ayesha Verrall please ask that question again.

Hon Dr Ayesha Verrall: Is she going to continue blaming everyone but herself—officials, the Opposition, the media—or will she fess up and just say how the document ended up in her office?

Hon CASEY COSTELLO: This topic has been fully traversed. I have explained repeatedly to this House where the document came from. I’m not sure what the mystery is to the member. She has not made any concerns about the redacted version she’s received.

Rt Hon Winston Peters: Can I ask the Minister: has she or her department, reformed as it now is, been able to work out why on earth you would be trying to seek a redacted copy when you’ve already got an unredacted one?

Hon Kieran McAnulty: There’s no responsibility there.

SPEAKER: Yes, she does.

Hon CASEY COSTELLO: I again would reflect on the fact that this issue is about some advice that was being used to form policy positions. There is a big programme of work going forward, and I hope that when the next legislation comes to the House around vaping controls, we will get support across the House to introduce proper policy positions.

Hon Dr Ayesha Verrall: How has she continued to find herself trapped in the web of her self-contradictions, and how does that reflect on her ability to manage her portfolios in a way that benefits the New Zealand public?

Rt Hon Winston Peters: Point of order. Mr Speaker, you cannot open with a statement like that and expect it to be a satisfactory parliamentary question. I mean, with the greatest respect—and you’re a most experienced person—she should’ve been stopped in her tracks and asked to get some advice about how you conduct yourself in Parliament when it comes to question time.

Hon Kieran McAnulty: Speaking to the point of order—

SPEAKER: OK, you can speak to the point of order.

Hon Kieran McAnulty: Thank you very much, Mr Speaker. The Minister that is being questioned has on at least two occasions had to correct responses to a number of questions that Dr Ayesha Verrall has asked her. They themselves are contradictions, and so it is entirely appropriate, reflecting on the scope of the question and the history leading up to it, to use that phrase in a question.

SPEAKER: There’s nothing wrong with using the phrase about there being contradictions, but there is a problem with the further descriptors that were put around that. Dr Ayesha Verrall might like to ask the question in a way that brings it into order.

Hon Dr Ayesha Verrall: How has she found herself needing to apologise again for her self-contradictions in the House, and how does that reflect on her ability to be a Minister in the New Zealand Government?

Hon CASEY COSTELLO: I reject the assertions in that question. I did not apologise yesterday; I sought leave to make a clarification and correction of what was said.

Have your say on the Oversight of Oranga Tamariki System Legislation Amendment Bill

Source: New Zealand Parliament

The bill seeks to enhance oversight and monitoring of the Oranga Tamariki system by making structural changes to the Independent Children’s Monitor and the Children and Young People’s Commission. The bill would do this by amending the Oversight of Oranga Tamariki System Act 2022 and the Children and Young People’s Commission Act 2022. Amendments to the Acts would include:

  • Making the Independent Children’s Monitor an independent Crown entity
  • Disestablishing the board model of the Children and Young Peoples Commission and reverting it to an independent Crown entity with a single Children’s Commissioner
  • Providing for consequential and transitional arrangements for the Monitor and Commission to enable a transition of functions, such as: general workforce issues, transfer of information, assets and liabilities and the new appointments for the Monitor and Commissioner.

The bill does not propose any changes to the roles of the Independent Children’s Monitor, the Children’s Commissioner or the Ombudsman (in situations where complaints are made that relate to children and young people).

Tell the Social Services and Community Committee what you think  

Make a submission on the bill by midnight on Sunday, 8 December 2024.

For more details about the bill:

For media enquiries contact:

Social Services and Community Committee Secretariat

(04) 817 9546 / SocialServices.Community@parliament.govt.nz

MIL OSI

Labour, Greens and Te Pāti Māori call on the Prime Minister to block the Treaty Principles Bill

Source: Green Party

The opposition parties stand united for an Aotearoa that honours Te Tiriti, rather than seeking to rewrite it. Labour, the Greens and Te Pāti Māori are working together against the Government’s divisive Treaty Principles Bill. 

The three opposition parties are listening to the clear and unified voice of Te Iwi Māori. 

Meanwhile, the Prime Minister is sidelining these voices and ignoring a scathing Waitangi Tribunal report, while pandering to a dangerous, reactionary fringe. It’s time for Christopher Luxon to stand by his word to Māori at Waitangi this year that he will “Honour the Treaty”.

“This Government is waging war on our existence as Māori and on the fabric of this nation. To all the people of Aotearoa, we need you. We need you all to join the Hīkoi for Te Tiriti. Tangata Whenua, Tangata Moana, Tangata Tiriti, this fight belongs to all of us,” Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi said.

“We are a movement that leaves no one behind. We are uniting for the Aotearoa our mokopuna deserve to inherit. This kaupapa is bigger than each of us,” Te Pāti Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer said.

“Governments come and go. Politicians come and go. Te Tiriti is foundational and enduring. Honouring Te Tiriti is the constitutional obligation of every Prime Minister – something Christopher Luxon must take personal responsibility for. Our nation has real, deep issues to deal with instead of this desperate, divisive, imported culture war,” Green Party Co-leader, Chlöe Swarbrick said.

“This bill fails to uphold the promises made in the Treaty and disregards the voices of Māori. It is essential that we protect the principles of partnership, participation, and protection that the Treaty embodies,” Labour leader Chris Hipkins said.

Labour Party, the Greens and Te Pāti Māori call on all New Zealanders mobilise with them against this bill and advocate for a future that respects Te Tiriti.

NZ must pursue independent foreign policy

Source: Green Party

The Green Party says the need is greater than ever for Aotearoa New Zealand to pursue an independent foreign policy.

“The US election result should be a wake-up call that our country must steer clear of the AUKUS military pact,” says the Green Party Foreign Affairs Spokesperson Teanau Tuiono.

“We cannot be hustled into a military alliance with the US, especially when it’s about to be led by a volatile firebrand with fascist leanings who cozies up to autocrats and dictators, and attacks the rights of women, immigrants, rainbow communities and the most vulnerable.

“Aotearoa New Zealand must return to the independent and principled approach to foreign affairs that we were valued for in the international community. We should use that position to advance climate action, protect nature, advocate for indigenous and human rights, and global justice.

“Advocating for, and working towards, peaceful solutions to the world’s conflicts must be an absolute priority for our country. Unfortunately, this Government is jeopardising our independent foreign policy voice and falling into line behind a march to conflict and great power antagonism that is reckless and unnecessary.

“The current, unstable geopolitical environment calls for cool heads. We should not be entering into any pillar of the AUKUS framework. Even if Pillar 2 is the so-called technology-only part of the agreement, it is still part of the same precarious project fixated on conflict with the west’s perceived enemies.

“The US involvement in the atrocities in Gaza and elsewhere in the Middle East should serve as a warning to us that tying ourselves to the military projects of a state that allows or facilitates indiscriminate attacks on civilian populations is unacceptable.

“Let’s remain an advocate for diplomacy and dialogue, and pursue our independent voice in world affairs. That’s what other countries look to us for,” says Teanau Tuiono.

Parliament Hansard Report – Wednesday, 6 November 2024 – Volume 779 – 001444

Source: New Zealand Parliament – Hansard

ORAL QUESTIONS

QUESTIONS TO MINISTERS

Question No. 1—Finance

1. RYAN HAMILTON (National—Hamilton East) to the Minister of Finance: What recent reports has she seen on the economy?

Hon NICOLA WILLIS (Minister of Finance): Today, Statistics New Zealand released its labour market statistics for the September quarter. This release includes information from the household labour force survey, which looks at people’s labour force status, and the quarterly employment survey, which captures earnings, paid hours, and jobs. The household labour force survey showed that the unemployment rate increased from 4.6 to 4.8 percent in the quarter, and the quarterly employment survey showed that average hourly earnings increased 3.9 percent over the previous year.

Ryan Hamilton: Why is unemployment rising?

Hon NICOLA WILLIS: Unemployment is rising and has been rising since 2001 because New Zealand has been in a prolonged recession, with monetary tightening used to drive high inflation out of the economy. Sadly, recessions have a human cost. My heart goes out to people who’ve lost their jobs and who are struggling to enter the labour market. Rising unemployment is a reminder of how letting inflation get a grip on the economy is so damaging.

Ryan Hamilton: Was the increase in the unemployment rate as much as expected?

Hon NICOLA WILLIS: No. The increase from 4.6 percent to 4.8 percent was lower than forecasters had been predicting. In its August Monetary Policy Statement, the Reserve Bank had forecast 5 percent unemployment and the Treasury had forecast 5.2 percent in the Budget update in May. To give some historical context, I would also point out to members that over the last 15 years, the average unemployment rate in New Zealand has been 5 percent.

Ryan Hamilton: What is the outlook for unemployment?

Hon NICOLA WILLIS: Today’s results reflect where we are in the economic cycle. Typically, when the economy starts underperforming, the unemployment rate is slow to rise. Then when the economy starts to pick up, it can be slow to fall. In other words, unemployment is a lagging indicator. Now, there are clear indications that the economy has turned upwards, but even so, I would expect the unemployment rate to rise a bit further before beginning to fall. In the August Monetary Policy Statement, for example, the Reserve Bank was forecasting the unemployment rate to rise to a peak of 5.4 percent early next year, then steadily decline.