Strict biosecurity measures in place on chicken farm

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

Biosecurity New Zealand has placed strict movement controls on a commercial rural Otago egg farm, after testing confirmed a high pathogenic strain of avian influenza in chickens that has likely developed from interactions with local waterfowl and wild birds. 

“Tests from the Mainland Poultry managed farm have identified a high pathogenic H7N6 subtype of avian influenza. While it is not the H5N1 type circulating among wildlife around the world that has caused concern, we are taking the find seriously,” says Biosecurity New Zealand deputy director-general Stuart Anderson. 

“Our testing shows it is unrelated to a H7 strain that was identified in Australia earlier this year, and we believe this case may have happened as part of a spillover event, where laying hens who were foraging outside of the shed were exposed to a low pathogenic virus from wild waterfowl.

“Low pathogenic viruses are present in wild birds here, especially waterfowl like ducks, geese, and swans, and the virus can mutate on interaction with chickens.

“It is important to note that the strain found on this farm is not a wildlife adapted strain like HN51, so we believe it is unlikely to be transmitted to mammals.”

There had been no reports of other ill or dead birds on other poultry farms, and there are no human health or food safety concerns. It is safe to consume thoroughly cooked egg and poultry products.

Mr Anderson says quick action had been taken in co-operation with Mainland Poultry and a restricted place notice issued.

“Test results late last night confirmed the strain, but we already had restrictions in place and expert biosecurity staff on site, with more arriving today.  Mainland Poultry took the right steps by reporting ill birds in one shed on the property and locking that building down as testing continued.

“We will move quickly, with Mainland Poultry, to depopulate birds on the remote property, and we’ve placed a 10-kilometre buffer zone around it alongside the restrictions preventing movement of animals, equipment, and feed.

“We aim to stamp this out like we did with infectious bursal viral disease that affected chickens in 2019,” Mr Anderson says.

John McKay, chief executive of Mainland Poultry, which manages the free-range farm, says it is committed to taking quick action.

“We have been preparing for an event like this for some time, knowing that low pathogenic avian influenza is already present in New Zealand wild birds. Fortunately, this is not the H5N1 type that has caused concern for wildlife in other parts of the world. International experience with avian influenza has shown us this particular strain (H7N6) can be eradicated quickly and successfully.

“We will be working closely with MPI to depopulate the affected shed, ensure rigorous testing of all other birds on the farm and manage the situation effectively. I’m confident with swift action and collaboration we can eradicate this,” says Mr McKay.

Mr Anderson says Biosecurity New Zealand is working closely with industry partners to ensure the find was dealt with quickly and any possible impacts to trade limited.

“Importantly, the farm has strong biosecurity standards and Mainland is helping with ongoing investigation and tracing of animal movements.

“We have put a lot of effort in with the poultry and egg sector, the Department of Conservation, and Ministry of Health to prepare for H5N1 and that puts us in a good position to deal with the less virulent H7N6 strain found on this farm.

“If anyone sees 3 or more sick or dead wild birds in a group, report it immediately to the exotic pest and disease hotline on 0800 80 99 66 so we can investigate the cause.”

For further information and general enquiries, call MPI on 0800 00 83 33 or email info@mpi.govt.nz

For media enquiries, contact the media team on 029 894 0328.

Proposed amendments to Chapter F of the Animal Products Notice: Production, Supply and Processing

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

Have your say

New Zealand Food Safety wants your input on additional proposed amendments to Chapter F of the Animal Products Notice: Production, Supply and Processing (the PSP Notice). These proposed changes include updates to clarify rules and align terminology.

Proposed changes to the PSP Notice

The PSP Notice specifies requirements for animal product businesses and recognised agencies and persons of these businesses under the Animal Products Act 1999.

This consultation proposes amendments to the clauses under Chapter F – Red Meat.

Part F1 – Farmed red meat animal supply

  • F1.5 – Content of supplier declarations: human consumption.
  • F1.6 – Content of supplier declarations: animal consumption.

Part F3 – Red meat processing

  • F3.9 – Ante-mortem examination at processing premises of animals for human consumption.
  • F3.10 – Processor requirements for pigs for human consumption excused from ante-mortem examination.

These amendments are additional to the amendments proposed in the consultation on the PSP Notice that closes on Tuesday 10 December 2024.

Consultation documents

Proposed amendments to Chapter F (red meat) of the Animal Products Notice: Production, Supply and Processing [PDF, 384 KB]

Draft PSP Notice

In the draft PSP Notice, the amendments that are proposed in this consultation are highlighted in green to distinguish them from the amendments proposed in the consultation closing on 10 December, which are highlighted in yellow.

Draft proposed amendments to the Animal Products Notice: Production Supply and Processing [PDF, 326 KB]

Making your submission

Email your submissions before 5pm on Monday 6 January 2025 to animal.products@mpi.govt.nz

To help make your submission, use the submission template [DOCX, 65 KB]

While we prefer email, you can post your submission to:

New Zealand Food Safety
Ministry for Primary Industries
PO Box 2526
Wellington 6140.

What to include

If you are using the feedback form, please make sure to include:

  • the name of this consultation 
  • your name and title
  • your organisation’s name (if you are submitting on behalf of an organisation, and whether your submission represents the whole organisation or a section of it)
  • your contact details (such as phone number, address, and email).

After the consultation closes

Submissions will be analysed to consider any changes needed to the PSP Notice. A summary of submissions will be published on this page.

Submissions are public information

Note that all, part, or a summary of your submission may be published on this website. Most often this happens when we issue a document that reviews the submissions received.

People can also ask for copies of submissions under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). The OIA says we must make the content of submissions available unless we have good reason for withholding it. Those reasons are detailed in sections 6 and 9 of the OIA.

If you think there are grounds to withhold specific information from publication, make this clear in your submission or contact us. Reasons may include that it discloses commercially sensitive or personal information. However, any decision MPI makes to withhold details can be reviewed by the Ombudsman, who may direct us to release it.

Official Information Act 1982 – NZ Legislation

High hazards newsletter – November 2024

Source: Worksafe New Zealand

Read our November 2024 high hazards update.

This edition of the WorkSafe high hazards newsletter covers:

  • Update from the Chief Inspector
  • International process safety week
  • Safety assessment gap found after incident
  • Recent electric shock incidents
  • Safety Critical Element failure learning – shutdown valve didn’t fully shut
  • New resource for warehouses
  • Hazardous substances professional specialist training modules
  • Incidents in the news 

Read the full newsletter(external link)

Subscribe to our high hazards newsletter(external link)

Asbestos Awareness Week 2024: A chat with Garrett Davidson from The Floor Store Commercial

Source: Worksafe New Zealand

This Asbestos Awareness Week we sat down with Garrett Davidson, the Operations Manager at The Floor Store Commercial, to talk about how they tackle asbestos.

“We’re well aware of the dangers of asbestos and we don’t take any risks. If in doubt, we stop everything and get it tested. We’d much rather be safe than sorry. I’m lucky our Managing Director, Joe, is so supportive of health and safety. He’s made it really clear that the responsibility comes from the top down and we need to look after our men on the front lines.”

As Operations Manager, Garrett runs a tight ship when it comes to health and safety. It’s his job to make sure the safety and wellbeing of his team is the priority. The processes and policies around asbestos are laid out in their asbestos management plan and clearly communicated to the team on the ground.

“You have to have a clear, strict process when dealing with stuff as dangerous as this. Sometimes you get people saying you’re taking it too seriously but we’re talking about the health and safety of my team – of course I’m going to take it seriously.”

This Asbestos Awareness Week, we’re making it easier for you to take asbestos seriously. Check out our updated guidance on asbestos in your workplace and our asbestos management plan example and template:

Asbestos Awareness Week 2024 resources

High-speed logging death adds to forestry toll

Source: Worksafe New Zealand

WorkSafe is again urging the forestry sector to reflect on what more it can do to improve safety, as the details of yet another worker death emerge from a court prosecution.

Jake Duncan was fatally struck when a log came loose and hurtled 325 metres down a hill at Tangoio, north of Napier, in June 2021. The 23-year-old was doing work known as breaking out, where felled logs are connected to a hauling machine for extraction.

The log had been put in place as a ‘plug’ which acted as a bridge for other logs to slide over, until it gave way with tragic consequences. This uncommon method is known as plugging and bridging.

The pre-harvest risk assessment only listed two hazards for the entire site, and did not properly consider the risks of the plugged log dislodging. The company should also have had better controls in place to minimise the risk of workers like Jake Duncan being struck.

These health and safety failures led to WorkSafe charging Mr Duncan’s employer, Logged on Logging 2020 Limited. In a reserved decision, the Napier District Court has ordered Logged on Logging to pay reparations. Another company, Forest Management (NZ) Limited, was sentenced in late 2023 for its health and safety failures unrelated to the death.

“Jake Duncan was a treasured father, partner, son, brother, and friend. The forestry industry owes it to whānau to ensure workers get home safely each day,” says WorkSafe’s area investigation manager Paul Budd.

Businesses must manage their risks and up to date, site-specific risk assessments are a must-have in forestry. Plugging and bridging is an unstable method, and logs should be cleared as soon as possible to avoid coming loose.

“Jake Duncan’s workmate only survived because he jumped in the opposite direction as the log came down the hill. The terror the two men must have endured as they saw the log coming towards them is unthinkable,” says Paul Budd.

WorkSafe’s new strategy zeroes in on forestry because its fatality rate is nearly 20 times higher than the average for all industries. Our priority plan for the sector notes workers hit or trapped by a moving object as a specific source of high harm. WorkSafe’s targeted frontline activities in forestry will be increasing as there are opportunities to significantly improve health and safety, reduce acute harm, and address inequities.

WorkSafe’s role is to influence businesses to meet their responsibilities and keep people healthy and safe, and where they don’t, we will take action.

Reserved decisions for Logged on Logging 2020 Limited
Reserved decision for Forest Management (NZ) Limited
WorkSafe’s guidance on safe retreat positions when breaking out

Background 

  • Logged on Logging 2020 Limited was sentenced in reserved decisions from the Napier District Court.
  • Reparations of $332,187 were ordered, but the company could not afford to pay a fine.
  • Logged on Logging 2020 Limited was charged under sections 36(1)(a), 48(1) and (2)(c). of the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015:
    • Being a PCBU having a duty to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health and safety of workers who work for the PCBU, including Jake William Duncan, while the workers were at work in the business or undertaking, did fail to comply with that duty, and the failure exposed the workers to the risk of serious injury or death.
  • The maximum penalty is a fine not exceeding $1.5 million.
  • Forest Management (NZ) Limited was sentenced in a reserved decision from the Napier District Court.
  • A fine of $50,400 was imposed.
  • Forest Management (NZ) Limited was charged under sections 36(1)(b) and 49(1) and (2)(c) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015;
    • Being a PCBU having a duty to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health and safety of workers whose activities in carrying out work it influenced or directed, while the workers were carrying out the work, did fail to comply with that duty.
  • The maximum penalty is a fine not exceeding $500,000.

Media contact details

For more information you can contact our Media Team using our media request form. Alternatively:

Email: media@worksafe.govt.nz

Work-related health newsletter – November 2024

Source: Worksafe New Zealand

Kia ora koutou and welcome to the November 2024 work-related health newsletter.

Thank you for your interest in work-related health this year. We’ll be back in February with the next edition of this newsletter but in the meantime, check out the latest guidance and information to help you ensure a healthy and safe work environment, especially over the summer.  

We hope you have a healthy and safe festive season. 

In this edition: 

  • Reminder about summer risks
  • Asbestos Awareness Week
  • New manual tasks screening and risk assessment tools 
  • Psychosocial risks guidance consultation
  • Work-related health notifications 
  • MBIE occupational diseases consultation
  • New Zealand Journal of Health and Safety Practice: From Robens to 2024

Read the full newsletter(external link)

A new import health standard for importing fresh cut flowers and foliage for decorative purposes

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

Background to this consultation

The Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) is proposing a new Import Health Standard: Fresh Cut Flowers and Foliage for Decorative Purposes.

The new standard will replace these 3 existing import health standards for cut flowers and foliage:

  • Cut Flowers and Foliage
  • Cut Flowers and Branches Cordyline and Dracaena Species from All Countries
  • Oncidium Cut Flowers.

All 3 standards are frequently used to enable imports but have not been updated for several years. We needed to review the biosecurity risks of importing cut flowers and foliage to ensure these risks are still being effectively managed.

We also wanted to fulfil requests to add new countries and new genera of cut flowers and foliage. This involved assessing the biosecurity risks and identifying suitable ways to manage them.

Have your say

We are proposing several key changes, as listed in section 1.6 of the RMP:

  • The genera available to import.
  • The countries available to import from.
  • A bilateral arrangement (export plan) between MPI and the exporting country’s NPPO may be required.
  • We are providing additional ways to safely import cut flowers and foliage.
  • No longer requiring a treatment to devitalise cut flowers and foliage.

From 19 November 2024 to 7 February 2025, you’re invited to give us feedback about the proposed new standard and the RMP.

Details of the rationale for the new standard and its requirements are in the risk management proposal (RMP).

Consultation documents

Draft IHS for Fresh Cut Flowers and Foliage for Decorative Purposes [PDF, 665 KB]

RMP for Fresh Cut Flowers and Foliage for Decorative Purposes [PDF, 755 KB]

Making your submission

Email your feedback on the consultation documents by 5pm on 7 February 2025 to PlantImports@mpi.govt.nz

Make sure you include in your submission:

  • the title of the consultation document in the subject line of your email
  • your name and title (if applicable)
  • your organisation’s name (if you’re submitting on behalf of an organisation)
  • your contact details (for example, phone number, address, and email).

While we prefer email, you can send your submission by post to:

Plant Products Team
Ministry for Primary Industries
PO Box 2526
Wellington 6140
New Zealand.

All submissions received by the closing date will be considered before the amended IHS is issued.  MPI may hold late submissions on file for consideration when the issued IHS is next revised or reviewed.

Next steps

After we have considered all submissions, there is a 10-day period which provides submitters with the opportunity to examine any changes to the IHS which have resulted from consultation. An independent review (under section 24 of the Biosecurity Act 1993) may be requested in this period if a submitter considers scientific evidence they raised during their submission has not received sufficient consideration. If there is no review, the IHS becomes final after 10 days.

Find out how we develop and change import health standards

Submissions are public information

Note that all, part, or a summary of your submission may be published on this website. Most often this happens when we issue a document that reviews the submissions received.

People can also ask for copies of submissions under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). The OIA says we must make the content of submissions available unless we have good reason for withholding it. Those reasons are detailed in sections 6 and 9 of the OIA.

If you think there are grounds to withhold specific information from publication, make this clear in your submission or contact us. Reasons may include that it discloses commercially sensitive or personal information. However, any decision MPI makes to withhold details can be reviewed by the Ombudsman, who may direct us to release it.

Official Information Act 1982 – NZ Legislation

Legal background

MPI must consult with interested parties in accordance with section 23 of the Biosecurity Act 1993 (the Act) and MPI’s consultation policy before issuing or amending (other than of minor or urgent nature) import health standards (IHS) under sections 24A and 24B of the Act.

An IHS specifies import requirements that must be met either in the country of origin or of export, or during transit, before biosecurity clearance can be given for the goods to enter New Zealand. MPI must ensure that these requirements are technically justified and provide an appropriate level of biosecurity protection.

Second notice of an application for a mātaitai reserve surrounding Moutohorā Island and the Rurima Island Group, Bay of Plenty

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

Your views sought

Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Awa (Ngāti Awa) has applied for a mātaitai reserve surrounding Moutohorā Island (Whale Island), and the Rurima Island Group in the Eastern Bay of Plenty.

Fisheries New Zealand invites submissions from persons having a fishing interest in the stock or stocks in the proposed mātaitai reserve.

Ngāti Awa and Fisheries New Zealand have previously consulted with the local community on the application.

Find out about the first consultation with the local community (closed 16 September 2024)

What area is being proposed?

The proposed area includes the New Zealand fisheries waters around Moutohorā Island (Whale Island), and the Rurima Island Group (Rurima, Moutoki, and Tokata), with the offshore boundaries extending to approximately 500 metres. The total proposed area is approximately 7.6 square kilometres.

Consultation documents

Map of proposed Rurima and Moutohorā Island mātaitai reserve [PDF, 2.3 MB]

Te Rūnanga o Ngāti awa mātaitai application [PDF, 7.5 MB]

Note 1: Te Rae o Kohi Mātaitai Reserve was established in 2018.

Note 2: The list of nominated kaitiaki will be updated.

Making your submission

Submissions close at 5pm on Monday 27 January 2025.

Email your submission to FMSubmissions@mpi.govt.nz

While we prefer email, you can post your submission to:

Fisheries management – Spatial allocations
Fisheries New Zealand
PO Box 2526
Wellington 6140.

Public notices about this consultation

Public notices about the call for submissions are scheduled to appear in the Bay of Plenty Times on 19 November, the Whakātane Beacon on 20 November, and the Ōpotiki News on 21 November 2024.

History of this application

In 2011, Ngāti Awa lodged the Rurima – Moutohorā mātaitai reserve application. At that time, the proposed offshore boundaries extended to 1 nautical mile.

Fisheries New Zealand consulted on the application 3 times between 2012 and 2016, resulting in Ngāti Awa reducing the size of the proposed area to address concerns of commercial fishers.

In 2018, the then Minister for Oceans and Fisheries deferred a decision on the application due to its potential impact on commercial fishers. Ngāti Awa stated that further reductions of the proposed area would erode their capacity to exercise customary rights and impair their ability to meet their obligation of kaitiakitanga over their important customary fishing grounds. 

In 2024, Ngāti Awa and Fisheries New Zealand agreed to proceed with the application with the offshore boundaries extending to approximately 500 metres.

Ngāti Awa and Fisheries New Zealand consulted with the local community between July and September 2024, and held a hui with the local community to discuss the application on 21 August 2024.

Find out about the consultation with the local community (closed 16 September 2024)

About mātaitai reserves

A mātaitai reserve is an identified traditional fishing ground which tangata whenua have a special relationship with. Mātaitai reserves are limited to fisheries waters and do not include any land area. Mātaitai reserves do not change any existing arrangements for access to private land.

Mātaitai reserves also do not affect private landowners’ land titles, or their ability to exercise resource consents for such things as taking water or extracting gravel or sand. Resource consents are managed under the Resource Management Act 1991.

Mātaitai reserves do not change the existing recreational fishing rules however, commercial fishing is banned in a mātaitai reserve.

Mātaitai reserves do not have an impact on whitebait or trout fishing.

Find out more about mātaitai reserves

Fisheries (Kaimoana Customary Fishing) Regulations 1998 – NZ Legislation 

Submissions are public information

Note that all, part, or a summary of your submission may be published on this website. Most often this happens when we issue a document that reviews the submissions received.

People can also ask for copies of submissions under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). The OIA says we must make the content of submissions available unless we have good reason for withholding it. Those reasons are detailed in sections 6 and 9 of the OIA.

If you think there are grounds to withhold specific information from publication, make this clear in your submission or contact us. Reasons may include that it discloses commercially sensitive or personal information. However, any decision MPI makes to withhold details can be reviewed by the Ombudsman, who may direct us to release it.

Official Information Act 1982 – NZ Legislation

Shellfish biotoxin warning for part of Bay of Plenty

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

New Zealand Food Safety (NZFS) is advising the public not to collect or consume shellfish gathered from an area of the Bay of Plenty due to the presence of paralytic shellfish toxins.

“Routine tests on tuatua from Waihi Beach have shown levels of paralytic shellfish toxins more than double the safe limit,” says NZFS deputy director-general Vincent Arbuckle.

The warning extends from the southern end of Pauanui Beach down to the entrance of Tauranga Harbour, by Mount Maunganui. The warning also includes Tauranga Harbour.

“Please do not gather and eat shellfish from this area because anyone doing so could get sick.

“Affected shellfish include bivalve shellfish such as mussels, oysters, tuatua, pipi, toheroa, cockles and scallops, as well as pūpū (cat’s eyes) and Cook’s turban. Kina are still safe to eat.

“It’s also important to know that cooking the shellfish does not remove the toxin.”

Symptoms of paralytic shellfish poisoning usually appear within 10 minutes to 3 hours of eating and may include:

  • numbness and a tingling (prickly feeling) around the mouth, face, hands, and feet
  • difficulty swallowing or breathing
  • dizziness and headache
  • nausea and vomiting
  • diarrhoea
  • paralysis and respiratory failure and, in severe cases, death.

Pāua, crab and crayfish may still be eaten if the gut has been completely removed prior to cooking, as toxins accumulate in the gut. If the gut is not removed, its contents could contaminate the meat during the cooking process. Finfish are not affected by this public health warning, but we advise gutting the fish and discarding the liver before cooking.

NZFS has had no notifications of associated illness.

If anyone becomes ill after eating shellfish from an area where a public health warning has been issued, phone Healthline for advice on 0800 61 11 16, or seek medical attention immediately. You are also advised to contact your nearest public health unit and keep any leftover shellfish in case it can be tested.

“NZFS is monitoring shellfish in the region and will notify the public of any changes to the situation,” says Mr Arbuckle.

Commercially harvested shellfish – sold in shops and supermarkets or exported – is subject to strict water and flesh monitoring programmes by NZFS to ensure they are safe to eat.

For further information and general enquiries, call MPI on 0800 00 83 33 or email info@mpi.govt.nz

For media enquiries, contact the media team on 029 894 0328.

Find out more

Shellfish biotoxin alerts

Subscribe to shellfish biotoxins to receive email alerts

See signage in the affected area.

Podcast about shellfish contamination

Collecting shellfish and keeping them safe [PDF, 1.4 MB]

Causes and symptoms of toxic shellfish poisoning

About toxic algal blooms

Food safety for seafood gatherers booklet [PDF, 1.2 MB]

Auckland man who illegally killed and sold pigs fined $7,500

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

An Auckland man was fined $7,500 in Pukekohe District Court after being found guilty of cruelty to pigs which he illegally processed and sold.

Anitema Tuungafasi Pulu (54) was on Friday (15 November 2024) sentenced on 3 representative charges under the Animal Welfare Act and the Animal Products Act in the Pukekohe District Court following a successful prosecution by the Ministry for Primary Industries, says MPI director of investigations and compliance support, Gary Orr.

Between September 2022 and May 2023, MPI covert investigators went to Mr Pulu’s Pukekohe property 6 times. They found Mr Pulu killing pigs inhumanely.  

In November 2022, he was served a notice of direction under the Animal Products Act which prohibited him from killing or selling animals, but he ignored the directive. 

“The distress and suffering he caused these pigs was unacceptable. In addition to his animal welfare offences, Mr Pulu neglected to register his business as required under the Animal Products Act. That means he tried to avoid the important checks and balances in our food safety system which are there to keep consumers safe,” says Gary Orr.

Animal welfare is everyone’s responsibility and MPI strongly encourages any member of the public who is aware of animal ill-treatment or cruelty to report it to the MPI animal welfare complaints freephone 0800 00 83 33.

For further information and general enquiries, email info@mpi.govt.nz

For media enquiries, contact the media team on 029 894 0328.