Amputation follows forklift trauma at Trade Depot

Source: Worksafe New Zealand

Businesses that contend with on-site traffic must learn from a collision that cost a woman her lower leg, WorkSafe New Zealand says.

The woman was waiting to collect whiteware from the customer collections area outside Trade Depot in Onehunga, when she was struck by a forklift in August 2022. The 68-year-old was rushed to hospital with injuries so severe her left leg had to be amputated below the knee.

WorkSafe charged Trade Depot after finding it had no effective traffic management plan to ensure moving vehicles and pedestrians were kept separate. In addition, WorkSafe investigators found that the lights on the forklift were not functioning at the time of incident.

“It is only by sheer luck that a serious injury or death was not caused before this incident. Forklifts were moving in and around pedestrians, delivering goods on a daily basis, but the site lacked any adequate systems to manage the risk of interaction between forklifts and pedestrians in the customer collections area,” says WorkSafe’s area investigation manager, Paul West.

“One-way systems, barriers, designated crossing points, and speed bumps or signage are among the measures that could have avoided this unfortunate injury. All businesses whose work requires traffic management should take notice of this case to ensure they aren’t falling short.”

In response to this incident, WorkSafe immediately issued two improvement notices to ensure a barrier was put between the pedestrian pathway and vehicles at the Onehunga site, and to ensure procedures were in place for forklifts operating near pedestrians. Both notices were complied with.

“Forklifts are a known risk – many people have died or been injured by forklift incidents, yet it’s clear the risks are not being appropriately managed in many workplaces. Risk assessment should consider anybody who could be harmed – which includes both workers and customers, and businesses must not lose sight of that,” says Paul West.

Read WorkSafe’s guidelines on managing work site traffic

Read about a 2016 WorkSafe prosecution of Trade Depot

Background

  • Trade Depot Limited was sentenced at Manukau District Court on 27 February 2024
  • A fine of $350,000 was imposed, and reparations of $141,502.12 ordered
  • Trade Depot was charged under sections 36(2), 48(1) and (2)(c) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015
    • Being a PCBU having a duty to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that the health and safety of other persons was not put at risk from work carried out as part of the conduct of the business or undertaking, namely operating forklifts in the customer collection area of Trade Depot Limited at 306 Neilson Street, Onehunga, Auckland, did fail to comply with that duty , and that failure exposed individuals to a risk of death or serious injury.
  • The maximum penalty is a fine not exceeding $1.5 million.

Media contact details

For more information you can contact our Media Team using our media request form. Alternatively, you can:

Phone: 021 823 007 or

Email: media@worksafe.govt.nz

Mangosteen and rambutan draft import health standard

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

Have your say

Biosecurity New Zealand is proposing changes to the requirements for importing mangosteen and rambutan plants for planting.

We appreciate the replies and information we got during the first consultation on the risk management proposal.

First consultation: Proposed imports of mangosteen and rambutan plants for planting

We have reviewed and considered the submissions received about the measures proposed in the first consultation. As a result, we have drafted amendments to the mangosteen and rambutan requirements in the nursery stock import health standard.  An import health standard is the legislative document that specifies the requirements for importing.

We now seek your feedback on the amended requirements for plants of mangosteen and rambutan. The amended requirements are located in 2 new schedules: Garcinia and Nephelium lappaceum. Those schedules are in the draft nursery stock import health standard.

The consultation is open for submissions from 27 February 2024 until 5pm, 19 March 2024.

Consultation documents

Draft import health standard [PDF, 3.3 MB]

Note: The new schedules for Garcinia and Nephelium lappaceum are in the draft import health standard.

WTO notification

NZL 757 – Add 1 – SPS Notification – Mangosteen and rambutan plants for planting [PDF, 114 KB]

Making a submission

We’re happy to discuss the changes we’re proposing at any time until the consultation closes. To arrange a phone or a video call, email plantimports@mpi.govt.nz

You can give us feedback by completing our online survey or by emailing us.

We want to hear your feedback, technical information, industry knowledge, and suggestions on the:

  • measures we’re proposing and the extent to which they will manage the risk of imported mangosteen and rambutan plants
  • feasibility of importing under the proposed requirements
  • understandability of the draft import health standard.

The consultation closes at 5pm, 19 March 2024.

Online survey

Email

Send your submissions to plantimports@mpi.govt.nz

Plain English allergen labelling good news for consumers

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

New requirements to make it easier for people to find information about common allergies on food labels come into effect on Sunday.

New Zealand Food Safety deputy director-general Vincent Arbuckle says the changes are good news for people with food allergies.

“For the up to 8% of New Zealanders who have food allergies the consequences of eating the wrong food can be serious, from swelling, hives and vomiting to anaphylaxis.

“People lead busy lives so food labelling needs to be as simple, clear and easy to find as possible to be effective.

“Food Safety Australia New Zealand, with input from New Zealand Food Safety, got valuable feedback from people affected by food allergies to help make sure the changes were effective and practical,” says Mr. Arbuckle.

All food packaged and labelled after Sunday 25 February 2024 must declare allergens or provide statements about the contents where appropriate. The requirements will vary depending on how the food is packaged, labelled and sold and risk that needs to be identified. Under the changes, potentially life-threatening common allergens must be listed in bold in the ingredients list and summarised in a ‘contains’ statement on the label.

Any food packaged and labelled before 25 February 2024 under the previous allergen labelling rules can continue to be sold until 25 February 2026.

Foods at cafes or restaurants including takeaways are not required to be labelled but must be displayed with the food such as listed on the menu, or provided to the customer on request.

Find out more labelling on our website.

If you have questions about allergen labelling, email info@mpi.govt.nz

For further information and general enquiries, call Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) on 0800 00 83 33 or email info@mpi.govt.nz

For media enquiries, contact the media team on 029 894 0328.

Kaingaroa farmers fined $29,000 over poor treatment and lack of feed for animals

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

A Far North farming couple has been fined $29,000 and banned from dairy farming over a lack of feed and poor treatment of their farm animals.

Mathew Hudson (78) and Josette Eleanor Hudson (73) were sentenced in the Kaitaia District Court this week (20/2/24) after pleading guilty to 4 charges under the Animal Welfare Act, following a successful prosecution by the Ministry for Primary Industries.

The Ministry for Primary Industries’ (MPI) regional manager, animal welfare and NAIT compliance north, Brendon Mikkelsen, says animal welfare inspectors visited the Hudsons’ farm in September 2020, following a complaint about the poor condition of their dairy herd and lack of feed.

“One of their cows was found suspended in hip clamps, because it was severely underweight and incapable of supporting its own weight. The animal was suffering pain and distress for days from the abrasions on its bony hip area and it was euthanised to end its suffering.

“People in charge of animals are responsible for their health and wellbeing at all times. The Hudsons had kept this animal alive when they knew the animal was in extremely poor health and they did nothing until they were directed to by animal welfare inspectors.”

Animal welfare inspectors found their cattle were producing less than 5 litres per cow per day, considerably less than they would be capable of if appropriately fed. Grass cover at their farm was uniformly low, and they were not providing supplementary feed to their dairy herd.

The inspectors concluded the Hudsons failed to provide proper and sufficient feed to all their animals. Of the 242 cattle at the farm, 69 cows were below the minimum standard of Body Condition Score, meaning they were too thin and needed urgent action to improve their condition.

“The Hudsons are experienced farmers who knew their responsibility to their animals and failed to live up to it. One of these cows was so thin, Mr Hudson used a tractor to drag it from a drain it was stuck in – leaving the animal with significant open wounds which were not treated.

“When we find evidence of neglect and cruelty to production animals – we will prosecute. Most farmers do the right thing for their animals – providing supplementary feed when needed and timely veterinarian care,” Brendon Mikkelsen says.

In addition to the fines, the Court ordered the Hudsons to pay $18,213.72 in costs for veterinarian services and farm consultant fees.

MPI strongly encourages any member of the public who is aware of animal ill-treatment or cruelty to report it to the MPI animal welfare complaints freephone 0800 00 83 33.

For further information and general enquiries, call MPI on 0800 00 83 33 or email info@mpi.govt.nz

For media enquiries, contact the media team on 029 894 0328

Unsafe Serene Classic S2068 wall mounted bathroom heaters prohibited

Source: Worksafe New Zealand

We have published a prohibition for the sale (including an offer to sell), and use (including installation) of the Serene Classic S2068 wall mounted bathroom heaters, pursuant to Regulation 87 of the Electricity (Safety) Regulations 2010.

Read the Gazette Notice(external link)

Gazette notice correction of the serial numbers(external link)

Serene S2068 heaters manufactured in March 2021 have a manufacturing defect. There have been several fires and overheating events associated with these heaters.

There is a significant risk of people being seriously harmed and property being damaged from electricity going through these heaters.

The prohibited S2068 heater is described as:

  • Wall mounted fan heater with step-down thermostat with pull-cord on-off switch, for fixed-wired installation in bathrooms and similar locations
  • Mirror polished stainless steel metal shell with die cast grille
  • Dimensions: 300 mm wide, 210 mm high and 110 mm deep.
Serene S2068 heater
Serene S2068 heater label

The prohibited S2068 heaters have a serial number in the following ranges:

  • VH145173 – VH147003
  • VK154294 – VK160567
  • WF167045 – WF168874

We are actively engaging with known suppliers and known locations that have the heaters available or installed to stop selling or using the heaters.

We also want to inform consumers who may have this appliance in their home, and potential suppliers such as stores and tradespeople, of what they need to do.

Other Serene bathroom heaters

We are also aware of two other Serene bathroom heater models, the S2069 and S207T, that we recently had tested, and did not comply with required safety standards. We are actively considering what further action needs to be taken in respect of these products.

If you have a bathroom heater in your home

  • Check if your heater is a Serene model S2068 with a serial number in the range listed above. You will find this information on the top side of the unit when mounted on the wall.
  • If you have this heater, do not use it.
  • If it is installed in your property, get an electrical worker to make it safe by isolating it from the electrical supply, or contact your landlord to arrange this, and they can dispose of it safely.

Simon Gallagher, National Manager, Consumer Services at MBIE:

The Consumer Guarantees Act (CGA) guarantees that products must be of acceptable quality, including safe to use. Where a product is unsafe — or doesn’t meet mandatory product safety requirements — you have the right to a refund, repair, or replacement. MBIE suggests consumers who have this heater return it to the supplier they purchased it from to discuss the most appropriate remedy under the CGA.

More information on consumer rights on unsafe products | consumerprotection.govt.nz(external link)

If you are a supplier of heaters

The Serene model S2068 with a serial number in the range listed above cannot legally be sold.

We are working with MBIE to reach out to known suppliers.

Simon Gallagher, National Manager, Consumer Services at MBIE:

MBIE are aware of the issues found by WorkSafe with the Serene S2068 appliance and are working with WorkSafe and the retailers of the product to discuss what they can do to ensure the safety of their customers. As part of this work, MBIE are encouraging these retailers to undertake a voluntary recall.

Questions?

Contact us at info@energysafety.govt.nz or 0800 030 040

Safety boost for Police speed camera operators

Source: Worksafe New Zealand

WorkSafe has accepted a binding commitment from the New Zealand Police to improve safety for speed camera operators, after one was critically injured in a high-speed collision on Auckland’s North Shore.

The operator was thrown from his parked van in August 2021, when it was struck by a car on the Upper Harbour Highway at Greenhithe. The car driver died, and the operator suffered life-changing injuries.

A WorkSafe investigation found that Police could have carried out a more effective risk assessment of locations where operators work from, and required them to park safely behind motorway barriers and/or use seatbelts.

In response to the incident, Police has now applied to WorkSafe with a comprehensive pledge to improve safety for its speed camera operators. WorkSafe has officially accepted the pledge, known as an enforceable undertaking, which includes:

  • Reparations to the injured operator
  • Delivery of an enhanced traffic camera operator induction and training package
  • Implementing a framework for managing critical risks and ways to control them
  • Creation of a dedicated critical risk team to embed the work programme
  • Presentation of lessons learned to the transport sector

“These activities will enable something positive to arise from serious harm. The aim is to bring about enduring health and safety change in a way that a fine through the courts may not have,” says WorkSafe’s deputy chief executive operations, Kane Patena.

The commitment is endorsed by both the injured operator and the Police Association, and will see a significant investment from Police towards worker and job safety.

As a result of the agreement, WorkSafe charges against Police have been discontinued meaning a trial due to start next month will no longer take place.

“WorkSafe will regularly monitor progress on the activities which have been agreed, and can resume prosecution if the commitment is not upheld,” says Kane Patena.

In 2025, NZTA will begin operating speed cameras through a contracted third-party provider, using a different operating model to that of Police. Police will provide information on lessons learned and improvements made to NZTA to help inform its operation of mobile cameras.

Read the enforceable undertaking decision document

Statement from New Zealand Police Deputy Commissioner Jevon McSkimming

Safety of the community and our people is at the heart of everything we do at New Zealand Police.

When one of our own is injured in the course of their duties, it’s felt deeply throughout the organisation.

Our Traffic Camera Operator (TCO) suffered serious harm, and we recognise the ongoing impact that has on his life, both personally and professionally.

While New Zealand Police continues to aid in his recovery, we know that is not enough – systematic change is required to ensure the safety of all 78 TCOs around the country.

This Enforceable Undertaking is an opportunity for us to further improve safe roadside policing.

More than a dozen changes to policy and processes are outlined in this binding agreement, from a health and safety review through to enhanced training for TCOs.

Some changes have already been made, including the establishment of a dedicated Critical Risk Programme team to embed the programme of work.

In 28 years of Mobile Speed Cameras, spanning hundreds of thousands of hours, this is the first incident of this nature. It’s important to note that this crash was a deliberate act by a member of the public who drove their vehicle at the Mobile Speed Camera van at considerable speed.

New Zealand Police has invested considerable internal resource and capability to undertake this rectification work and is committed to continuous safety improvement.

Statement from the injured traffic camera operator

I am pleased to see Police enter this agreement with WorkSafe. I hope it leads to long-term improvements, so nobody has to endure a repeat of what I’ve gone through.

When the collision happened, I was extremely smashed up. I spent the first few days in intensive care fighting for my life with a skull fracture and scalp lacerations, lung injuries, and fractures to my ribs and legs. With a total of three months in hospital, I was plain lucky to survive.

I still live with ongoing pain, and have difficulty walking long distances, but am able to swim and cycle.

Although I had 106 weeks off work, the goal I set myself was to return to being a traffic camera operator and did so in December 2022.

I am grateful to my wife and family for their support throughout my recovery – but also the Police for enabling me to return to work.

Media contacts

For WorkSafe: media@worksafe.govt.nz

For Police: media@police.govt.nz

Corrigendum — Notice of intention to correct register

Source: Companies Office – Press Release/Statement:

Headline: Corrigendum — Notice of intention to correct register

A corrigendum relating to the notice of intention to correct register for THE PHO HOUSE LIMITED | 8030884 published on 9 February 2024,

In the notice titled “Notice of Intention to Correct Register” published in the New Zealand Gazette, 9 February 2024, Notice No. 2024-ot469, the Registrar of Companies advised of his intention to remove the Update of Shares and Particulars of Shares dated 5 February 2024 on the New Zealand Register of Companies, in relation to THE PHO HOUSE LIMITED (8030884). The effect being that the total number of shares is 1,000 shares, held by Bill Nguyen.

The correct total number of shares is 100.

Dated this 19th day of February 2024.

SANJAI RAJ, Registrar of Companies.

Review of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

Have your say

This consultation is run by the Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care.

The Review of the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 (FSANZ Act) is a comprehensive examination of the effectiveness of the Act and the associated operations and responsibilities of Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ). The Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care is leading the review of the FSANZ Act.

FSANZ is the independent agency responsible for developing and administering standards within the Food Standards Code for both Australia and New Zealand.

This consultation seeks feedback on the early assessment impact analysis, which outlines a series of reform components to be considered as part of the FSANZ Act review. The reform components are grouped under 4 themes:

  • purpose and objectives of FSANZ
  • reforming standard-setting
  • efficient and effective options
  • improving system agility.

The consultation will inform the final model of reform for the FSANZ Act review.

Background to the Australia New Zealand joint food regulation system

New Zealand and Australia have a unique shared regulatory system that sees us jointly developing food composition and labelling policy and standards. This is based on the agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of New Zealand establishing a System for the Development of Joint Food Standards (the Joint Food Treaty). 

Food law, treaties, and agreements – FSANZ

Making your submission

The consultation opened on 15 February 2024 and will close on 4 April 2024.

All consultation documents, further information, and instructions for making a submission are on the Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care website.

Who to contact

If you have questions about this consultation, email fsanzactreview@health.gov.au

If you have questions on New Zealand’s role in the joint system, email transtasman@mpi.govt.nz

Find out more

Food Standards Australia New Zealand

Australia-New Zealand cooperation and the Food Treaty

Food Standards Australia New Zealand Act 1991 – Federal Register of Legislation (Australia) 

New appointees to mining regulator

Source: Worksafe New Zealand

Five experienced industry figures have been selected to join the New Zealand Mining Board of Examiners.

WorkSafe has responsibility for setting competency standards in the extractives industry. The Board was established in response to the Royal Commission into the Pike River Coal Mine Tragedy. It advises WorkSafe on competencies, examines applicants, and issues and renews certificates of competence, among other functions.

The new appointees are Liz McKenzie, Andrew Weir, Andy Allen, Ed Ayre and Mathew Vandy. Fiona Bartier and Tim Kennedy have been reappointed, taking the full Board membership to 11 in total.

“All corners of the extractives sector are represented on the Board – we have representatives from the quarrying and mining industries alongside those with expertise in learning and development. There is a strong link to the industry’s training organisation, the Workforce Development Council,” says the Board’s chairperson, Paul Hunt.

“Above all, the Board members collectively bring a zest for getting health and safety right in the extractive sector. Improving the competence of the people in the industry is one of the most important aspects of improving health and safety performance,” says Paul Hunt.

Two inaugural members of the Board, Michelle Crompton and Steve Bell, are stepping down after more than a decade, having made significant contributions. Matt Mules and Garth Elliot have also stepped down, as has Dinghy Pattinson who has taken a new role as a WorkSafe inspector.

The Board of Examiners appointees begin their three-year terms this month.

Meet the NZ Mining Board of Examiners
 

Removal notice – section 318(1)(f)

Source: Companies Office – Press Release/Statement:

Headline: Removal notice – section 318(1)(f)

Notice of intention to remove 7 companies from the Companies Register.

I intend to remove the following companies from the register under section 318(1)(f) of the Companies Act 1993 , on the grounds that the companies have failed to pay the fee prescribed by regulations for the application for registration of the company under section 12 of the Act.

If the prescribed fee is not paid to the Registrar of Companies within 20 working days after the date of this notice, then the companies will be removed from the New Zealand register.

There are no grounds for objection under section 321 of the Companies Act 1993.

Dated this DDth day of MONTH 2024

SANJAI RAJ
Registrar of Companies