Situation update H7N6 bird flu detection Otago – 05 December 2024

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

Biosecurity New Zealand says initial testing and ongoing monitoring is showing no signs yet of disease on other chicken farms operated by Mainland Poultry in Otago, however extensive work continues.

About 1,000 samples have been received for testing at the Ministry for Primary Industries’ (MPI’s) internationally recognised laboratory at Wallaceville in Wellington, and it is prioritising analysis according to assessed risk.

“The first batch of results, and ongoing monitoring at Mainland Poultry’s properties that have links to the Hillgrove site, show no signs of new disease at this stage, which is promising. However, we are continuing rigorous testing as the disease has an incubation period,” Biosecurity New Zealand’s deputy director-general Stuart Anderson says.

“There have been no signs of production loss or ill birds at Mainland Poultry’s 5 other properties to date, and we will keep monitoring closely.”

Mr Anderson says samples from a smaller free-range chicken farm near Dunedin are being closely analysed and test results are expected soon.

“We acted swiftly on Tuesday, issuing a precautionary restricted placed notice for the property after some of its estimated 6,000 birds died. Those restrictions stopped the movement of material on and off the farm,” Mr Anderson says.

“Testing is normal in biosecurity responses where illness is identified. We acknowledge this is an extremely difficult time for the affected farmers, through no fault of their own, and we are working to support them.”

Mr Anderson says samples are being analysed at the MPI’s multi-million-dollar laboratory in Wallaceville, which is the only facility of its kind in the country.

“We are fortunate to have the facility at Wallaceville. It is the only enhanced PC3 laboratory in the country, meaning it has the highest level of biocontainment approved in New Zealand,” Mr Anderson says.

“This is New Zealand’s first veterinary laboratory to be recognised internationally as a reference laboratory. Having this specialist testing capability means we can get test results faster. Previously, we would have had to send these types of samples to Australia for testing and analysis.

“Staff at the laboratory are methodically working their way through hundreds of samples at a time.”

Mr Anderson says work is continuing today to support Mainland Poultry to humanely cull chickens in 2 of its sheds on one of its Otago farms.

“We are working at a steady pace and the depopulation is progressing well. Two trucks transporting carcasses, eggs and litter from the affected sheds, left the property yesterday afternoon,” Mr Anderson says.

“The material is being taken to a secure landfill in Southland, which is equipped to take this kind of waste.

“The cull is using the industry standard practice of CO₂ containerised gas, which farms regularly use to euthanise chickens.”

Mr Andersons says rigorous testing will need to continue over the coming days and weeks and Biosecurity New Zealand will take action as required.

“The incubation period for the virus is usually 3 to 14 days, with a possibility up to 21 days, so testing will continue over the next 2 to 3 weeks,” Mr Anderson says.

Biosecurity New Zealand has increased its presence on the ground in Otago and has set up a regional control centre to manage the situation.

Mr Anderson reminded people the risk to human health remains low, and there are no concerns for food safety or wildlife.

“Avian influenza viruses are killed by cooking, so it remains safe to eat thoroughly cooked egg and poultry products,” Mr Anderson says.

“Raw eggs have always been considered a high-risk food. Our advice remains not to consume or serve raw eggs, especially to those with low or compromised immune systems, as the eggs may contain harmful pathogens.”

Note, we will send out a further update if we receive significant new information.

MPI chief veterinary officer Dr Mary van Andel will be available for media interviews at the Charles Fergusson Building in Wellington between 2pm to 3.30pm today. Contact our media team to make a time.

For more information, email: BiosecurityNZ_media@mpi.govt.nz

Proposed bylaws for 9 mātaitai on the west coast of the South Island

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

Have your say

Makaawhio Tangata Tiaki/Kaitiaki have proposed bylaws to maintain and improve sustainability and increase fish stocks within 9 West Coast mātaitai.

This includes changes to the recreational fishing rules for a number of fish, shellfish, and seaweed species within these mātaitai.

Submissions open on 5 December 2024 and will close at 5pm on Friday 31 January 2025.  

What’s being proposed?

The 9  mātaitai are:

The proposed bylaws are different for each mātaitai but generally would:

  • prohibit taking seaweed except karengo and wakame (Undaria)
  • prohibit taking of some shellfish species
  • reduce daily limits for some fish and shellfish species
  • reduce combined daily finfish bag limits in some mātaitai
  • implement a maximum tail width for spiny rock lobster of 70mm in some mātaitai
  • implement a maximum daily limit per vessel for spiny rock lobster, pāua, blue cod, and combined finfish bag limits for some mātaitai.

Consultation document

Makaawhio Mātaitai Reserves proposed draft bylaws [PDF, 272 KB]

Making a submission

You can make submissions about the proposed draft bylaws by 5pm on Friday 31 January 2025. Email your feedback to fmsubmissions@mpi.govt.nz

While we prefer email, you can also post your written submission to:

Inshore Fisheries South
Ministry for Primary Industries
Private Bag 1926
Dunedin 9054.

A copy of the proposed bylaws may be inspected from 5 December 2024 during normal office hours at:

The Fisheries New Zealand office
73 Otaki Street
Dunedin

The Fisheries New Zealand office
14 Sir William Pickering Drive
Christchurch

Makaawhio Rūnanga office
125 Revell Street
Hokitika

Department of Conservation
Awarua/Haast Visitor Centre, Haast Junction,
Corner SH6 and Jackson Bay Road, Haast.

Definition of mātaitai reserves

A mātaitai reserve is an identified traditional fishing ground which tangata whenua have a special relationship with. They are limited to fisheries waters and do not include any land area. Mātaitai reserves do not change any existing arrangements for access to private land.

More information about mataitai reserves

Submissions are public information

Note that all, part, or a summary of your submission may be published on this website. Most often this happens when we issue a document that reviews the submissions received.

People can also ask for copies of submissions under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). The OIA says we must make the content of submissions available unless we have good reason for withholding it. Those reasons are detailed in sections 6 and 9 of the OIA.

If you think there are grounds to withhold specific information from publication, make this clear in your submission or contact us. Reasons may include that it discloses commercially sensitive or personal information. However, any decision MPI makes to withhold details can be reviewed by the Ombudsman, who may direct us to release it.

Official Information Act 1982 – NZ Legislation

Situation update H7N6 bird flu detection Otago – 4 December 2024

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

Biosecurity New Zealand is taking further action today to stamp out a high pathogenic strain of avian influenza, H7N6, detected on a commercial egg farm in rural Otago.

“Work started this morning to humanely cull chickens in 2 sheds on a farm managed by Mainland Poultry, where testing confirmed cases of an H7N6 subtype of avian influenza in birds,” Biosecurity New Zealand deputy director-general Stuart Anderson says.

“We’ve also placed a precautionary restricted place notice on a small free-range farm near Dunedin, stopping the movement of material on and off the property.

“As is normal in biosecurity responses, we always investigate where illness is identified. The property has around 6,000 birds, with a number of deaths, and testing is underway. 

Mr Anderson says the cull at the Mainland Poultry’s egg farm is being carried out by the business and supported by Biosecurity New Zealand.

“The cull is expected to take 2 to 3 days, using the existing industry standard practice of CO2 containerised gas, which farms regularly use to euthanise chickens,” Mr Anderson says.

“The carcasses, along with litter from the affected sheds, will be transported to a secure landfill in Southland, equipped to take this kind of waste,” Mr Anderson says.

“The carcases will be loaded directly onto trucks with a leak-proof plastic lining, which has been thoroughly tested.

“It’s important to point out the landfill has specific features to prevent the leaching of materials into the environment, including impermeable layers, and a process of routine monitoring.

“The disposal will be in a deep pit and in an area well away from any public access, and the landfill will be closed during this process.”

Mr Anderson says testing has been conducted at the smaller poultry farm near Dunedin.

“The property is not owned by Mainland Poultry, and we are investigating if there are any links between the first property and this one.”

Mr Anderson says testing is being carried out on birds in remaining sheds on Mainland Poultry’s egg farm and at other properties of interest.

“We will continue rigorous testing over the coming days and weeks and will take action as required,” Mr Anderson says.

“There had been no reports of concern about other ill or dead birds on other poultry farms.

“Contract tracing has revealed limited movements between Mainland Poultry’s affected farm and some of the other poultry farms in the area.”

Mr Anderson is reminding people the risk to human health remains low, and there are no concerns for food safety or wildlife.

“Avian influenza viruses are killed by cooking, so it remains safe to eat thoroughly cooked egg and poultry products,” Mr Anderson says.

“Raw eggs have always been considered a high-risk food. Our advice remains not to consume or serve raw eggs, especially to those with low or compromised immune systems, as the eggs may contain harmful pathogens, including salmonella.”

The 10-kilometre buffer zone around Mainland Poultry’s egg farm will now be referred to as an enhanced surveillance zone.

Biosecurity New Zealand will be increasing its presence on the ground in Otago and has set up a regional control centre today to manage the situation.

“Over 100 staff across MPI, including frontline biosecurity, trade and market access, veterinarians, agriculture, communications, and food safety are contributing to the response and this number is increasing daily as required, both on the ground in Otago and in our operations centre,” Mr Anderson says.

For further information and general enquiries, call MPI on 0800 00 83 33 or email info@mpi.govt.nz

For media enquiries, contact the media team on 029 894 0328.

H7N6 in Otago – situation update 03 December 2024

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

Biosecurity New Zealand continues to work closely with Mainland Poultry following the detection of a high pathogenic strain of avian influenza, H7N6, at one of its commercial egg farms in rural Otago.

“Testing has confirmed further cases of an H7N6 subtype of avian influenza in chickens in a second shed at the farm, “Biosecurity New Zealand deputy director-general Stuart Anderson says.

“The remote farm remains under strict biosecurity controls to restrict the movement of birds, poultry products, feed, and equipment on or off the property. The detection of further positive cases on the farm is not unexpected given the nature of the virus.”

Mr Anderson says the birds in both sheds, which total about 80,000-layer hens, would be humanely culled with the farmer’s cooperation and this is planned to start tomorrow (Wednesday).

“This is expected to take 2 to 3 days, using existing industry standard practice of CO2 containerised gas, which farms regularly use to euthanise chickens. At present, there will be no major impact on egg supplies as New Zealand has about 3.9-million-layer hens a year.

“Once the sheds have been depopulated, they will be thoroughly cleaned. It will be sometime before those sheds can be safely repopulated. We have Biosecurity New Zealand response staff on-site in Otago, and they are providing advice and guidance, including logistics and planning with depopulation and disposal of the birds.”

Testing of other sheds on the property continues.

“If required, we will put more restrictions in place, however, at this stage, there have been no further reports of any avian influenza type symptoms showing in chickens in any other poultry farm.

Mr Anderson says the risk to human health remains low, and there are no concerns for food safety or wildlife.

The property, managed by Mainland Poultry, was placed under a restricted place notice on Sunday after results from testing confirmed H7N6 strain in chickens from one shed on the property. The virus has likely developed from interactions with local waterfowl and wild birds.  

Mr Anderson is on site at the Otago farm today to observe operations.

“We acknowledge this is an extremely difficult time for the farm’s operator, but we commend their actions,” Mr Anderson says.

“Mainland Poultry took the right steps by notifying us of sick and dying birds. The farm has strong biosecurity standards. 3 specialist veterinarians from the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) are on site.

“They have been carrying out further investigations and taking samples from birds in other sheds on the farm and conducting tracing work to six other poultry farms in the area that are linked to the affected property. 

“We are also tracing all movements to and from the farm over the past week. We will place biosecurity controls on any property if we need to manage any biosecurity risk.”

Mr Anderson says next steps include continuing to collect samples for testing. The incubation period for the virus is usually 3-14 days, with a possibility up to 21 days, so testing will continue over the next 2-3 weeks.

“Biosecurity New Zealand has a comprehensive surveillance programme of all poultry properties in the area, where we are testing birds on those properties for any signs of avian influenza.”

A further update will be provided at midday tomorrow.

For more information, email: BiosecurityNZ_media@mpi.govt.nz

For further information and general enquiries, call MPI on 0800 00 83 33 or email info@mpi.govt.nz

For media enquiries, contact the media team on 029 894 0328.

Strict biosecurity measures in place on chicken farm

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

Biosecurity New Zealand has placed strict movement controls on a commercial rural Otago egg farm, after testing confirmed a high pathogenic strain of avian influenza in chickens that has likely developed from interactions with local waterfowl and wild birds. 

“Tests from the Mainland Poultry managed farm have identified a high pathogenic H7N6 subtype of avian influenza. While it is not the H5N1 type circulating among wildlife around the world that has caused concern, we are taking the find seriously,” says Biosecurity New Zealand deputy director-general Stuart Anderson. 

“Our testing shows it is unrelated to a H7 strain that was identified in Australia earlier this year, and we believe this case may have happened as part of a spillover event, where laying hens who were foraging outside of the shed were exposed to a low pathogenic virus from wild waterfowl.

“Low pathogenic viruses are present in wild birds here, especially waterfowl like ducks, geese, and swans, and the virus can mutate on interaction with chickens.

“It is important to note that the strain found on this farm is not a wildlife adapted strain like HN51, so we believe it is unlikely to be transmitted to mammals.”

There had been no reports of other ill or dead birds on other poultry farms, and there are no human health or food safety concerns. It is safe to consume thoroughly cooked egg and poultry products.

Mr Anderson says quick action had been taken in co-operation with Mainland Poultry and a restricted place notice issued.

“Test results late last night confirmed the strain, but we already had restrictions in place and expert biosecurity staff on site, with more arriving today.  Mainland Poultry took the right steps by reporting ill birds in one shed on the property and locking that building down as testing continued.

“We will move quickly, with Mainland Poultry, to depopulate birds on the remote property, and we’ve placed a 10-kilometre buffer zone around it alongside the restrictions preventing movement of animals, equipment, and feed.

“We aim to stamp this out like we did with infectious bursal viral disease that affected chickens in 2019,” Mr Anderson says.

John McKay, chief executive of Mainland Poultry, which manages the free-range farm, says it is committed to taking quick action.

“We have been preparing for an event like this for some time, knowing that low pathogenic avian influenza is already present in New Zealand wild birds. Fortunately, this is not the H5N1 type that has caused concern for wildlife in other parts of the world. International experience with avian influenza has shown us this particular strain (H7N6) can be eradicated quickly and successfully.

“We will be working closely with MPI to depopulate the affected shed, ensure rigorous testing of all other birds on the farm and manage the situation effectively. I’m confident with swift action and collaboration we can eradicate this,” says Mr McKay.

Mr Anderson says Biosecurity New Zealand is working closely with industry partners to ensure the find was dealt with quickly and any possible impacts to trade limited.

“Importantly, the farm has strong biosecurity standards and Mainland is helping with ongoing investigation and tracing of animal movements.

“We have put a lot of effort in with the poultry and egg sector, the Department of Conservation, and Ministry of Health to prepare for H5N1 and that puts us in a good position to deal with the less virulent H7N6 strain found on this farm.

“If anyone sees 3 or more sick or dead wild birds in a group, report it immediately to the exotic pest and disease hotline on 0800 80 99 66 so we can investigate the cause.”

For further information and general enquiries, call MPI on 0800 00 83 33 or email info@mpi.govt.nz

For media enquiries, contact the media team on 029 894 0328.

Proposed amendments to Chapter F of the Animal Products Notice: Production, Supply and Processing

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

Have your say

New Zealand Food Safety wants your input on additional proposed amendments to Chapter F of the Animal Products Notice: Production, Supply and Processing (the PSP Notice). These proposed changes include updates to clarify rules and align terminology.

Proposed changes to the PSP Notice

The PSP Notice specifies requirements for animal product businesses and recognised agencies and persons of these businesses under the Animal Products Act 1999.

This consultation proposes amendments to the clauses under Chapter F – Red Meat.

Part F1 – Farmed red meat animal supply

  • F1.5 – Content of supplier declarations: human consumption.
  • F1.6 – Content of supplier declarations: animal consumption.

Part F3 – Red meat processing

  • F3.9 – Ante-mortem examination at processing premises of animals for human consumption.
  • F3.10 – Processor requirements for pigs for human consumption excused from ante-mortem examination.

These amendments are additional to the amendments proposed in the consultation on the PSP Notice that closes on Tuesday 10 December 2024.

Consultation documents

Proposed amendments to Chapter F (red meat) of the Animal Products Notice: Production, Supply and Processing [PDF, 384 KB]

Draft PSP Notice

In the draft PSP Notice, the amendments that are proposed in this consultation are highlighted in green to distinguish them from the amendments proposed in the consultation closing on 10 December, which are highlighted in yellow.

Draft proposed amendments to the Animal Products Notice: Production Supply and Processing [PDF, 326 KB]

Making your submission

Email your submissions before 5pm on Monday 6 January 2025 to animal.products@mpi.govt.nz

To help make your submission, use the submission template [DOCX, 65 KB]

While we prefer email, you can post your submission to:

New Zealand Food Safety
Ministry for Primary Industries
PO Box 2526
Wellington 6140.

What to include

If you are using the feedback form, please make sure to include:

  • the name of this consultation 
  • your name and title
  • your organisation’s name (if you are submitting on behalf of an organisation, and whether your submission represents the whole organisation or a section of it)
  • your contact details (such as phone number, address, and email).

After the consultation closes

Submissions will be analysed to consider any changes needed to the PSP Notice. A summary of submissions will be published on this page.

Submissions are public information

Note that all, part, or a summary of your submission may be published on this website. Most often this happens when we issue a document that reviews the submissions received.

People can also ask for copies of submissions under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). The OIA says we must make the content of submissions available unless we have good reason for withholding it. Those reasons are detailed in sections 6 and 9 of the OIA.

If you think there are grounds to withhold specific information from publication, make this clear in your submission or contact us. Reasons may include that it discloses commercially sensitive or personal information. However, any decision MPI makes to withhold details can be reviewed by the Ombudsman, who may direct us to release it.

Official Information Act 1982 – NZ Legislation

A new import health standard for importing fresh cut flowers and foliage for decorative purposes

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

Background to this consultation

The Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) is proposing a new Import Health Standard: Fresh Cut Flowers and Foliage for Decorative Purposes.

The new standard will replace these 3 existing import health standards for cut flowers and foliage:

  • Cut Flowers and Foliage
  • Cut Flowers and Branches Cordyline and Dracaena Species from All Countries
  • Oncidium Cut Flowers.

All 3 standards are frequently used to enable imports but have not been updated for several years. We needed to review the biosecurity risks of importing cut flowers and foliage to ensure these risks are still being effectively managed.

We also wanted to fulfil requests to add new countries and new genera of cut flowers and foliage. This involved assessing the biosecurity risks and identifying suitable ways to manage them.

Have your say

We are proposing several key changes, as listed in section 1.6 of the RMP:

  • The genera available to import.
  • The countries available to import from.
  • A bilateral arrangement (export plan) between MPI and the exporting country’s NPPO may be required.
  • We are providing additional ways to safely import cut flowers and foliage.
  • No longer requiring a treatment to devitalise cut flowers and foliage.

From 19 November 2024 to 7 February 2025, you’re invited to give us feedback about the proposed new standard and the RMP.

Details of the rationale for the new standard and its requirements are in the risk management proposal (RMP).

Consultation documents

Draft IHS for Fresh Cut Flowers and Foliage for Decorative Purposes [PDF, 665 KB]

RMP for Fresh Cut Flowers and Foliage for Decorative Purposes [PDF, 755 KB]

Making your submission

Email your feedback on the consultation documents by 5pm on 7 February 2025 to PlantImports@mpi.govt.nz

Make sure you include in your submission:

  • the title of the consultation document in the subject line of your email
  • your name and title (if applicable)
  • your organisation’s name (if you’re submitting on behalf of an organisation)
  • your contact details (for example, phone number, address, and email).

While we prefer email, you can send your submission by post to:

Plant Products Team
Ministry for Primary Industries
PO Box 2526
Wellington 6140
New Zealand.

All submissions received by the closing date will be considered before the amended IHS is issued.  MPI may hold late submissions on file for consideration when the issued IHS is next revised or reviewed.

Next steps

After we have considered all submissions, there is a 10-day period which provides submitters with the opportunity to examine any changes to the IHS which have resulted from consultation. An independent review (under section 24 of the Biosecurity Act 1993) may be requested in this period if a submitter considers scientific evidence they raised during their submission has not received sufficient consideration. If there is no review, the IHS becomes final after 10 days.

Find out how we develop and change import health standards

Submissions are public information

Note that all, part, or a summary of your submission may be published on this website. Most often this happens when we issue a document that reviews the submissions received.

People can also ask for copies of submissions under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). The OIA says we must make the content of submissions available unless we have good reason for withholding it. Those reasons are detailed in sections 6 and 9 of the OIA.

If you think there are grounds to withhold specific information from publication, make this clear in your submission or contact us. Reasons may include that it discloses commercially sensitive or personal information. However, any decision MPI makes to withhold details can be reviewed by the Ombudsman, who may direct us to release it.

Official Information Act 1982 – NZ Legislation

Legal background

MPI must consult with interested parties in accordance with section 23 of the Biosecurity Act 1993 (the Act) and MPI’s consultation policy before issuing or amending (other than of minor or urgent nature) import health standards (IHS) under sections 24A and 24B of the Act.

An IHS specifies import requirements that must be met either in the country of origin or of export, or during transit, before biosecurity clearance can be given for the goods to enter New Zealand. MPI must ensure that these requirements are technically justified and provide an appropriate level of biosecurity protection.

Second notice of an application for a mātaitai reserve surrounding Moutohorā Island and the Rurima Island Group, Bay of Plenty

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

Your views sought

Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Awa (Ngāti Awa) has applied for a mātaitai reserve surrounding Moutohorā Island (Whale Island), and the Rurima Island Group in the Eastern Bay of Plenty.

Fisheries New Zealand invites submissions from persons having a fishing interest in the stock or stocks in the proposed mātaitai reserve.

Ngāti Awa and Fisheries New Zealand have previously consulted with the local community on the application.

Find out about the first consultation with the local community (closed 16 September 2024)

What area is being proposed?

The proposed area includes the New Zealand fisheries waters around Moutohorā Island (Whale Island), and the Rurima Island Group (Rurima, Moutoki, and Tokata), with the offshore boundaries extending to approximately 500 metres. The total proposed area is approximately 7.6 square kilometres.

Consultation documents

Map of proposed Rurima and Moutohorā Island mātaitai reserve [PDF, 2.3 MB]

Te Rūnanga o Ngāti awa mātaitai application [PDF, 7.5 MB]

Note 1: Te Rae o Kohi Mātaitai Reserve was established in 2018.

Note 2: The list of nominated kaitiaki will be updated.

Making your submission

Submissions close at 5pm on Monday 27 January 2025.

Email your submission to FMSubmissions@mpi.govt.nz

While we prefer email, you can post your submission to:

Fisheries management – Spatial allocations
Fisheries New Zealand
PO Box 2526
Wellington 6140.

Public notices about this consultation

Public notices about the call for submissions are scheduled to appear in the Bay of Plenty Times on 19 November, the Whakātane Beacon on 20 November, and the Ōpotiki News on 21 November 2024.

History of this application

In 2011, Ngāti Awa lodged the Rurima – Moutohorā mātaitai reserve application. At that time, the proposed offshore boundaries extended to 1 nautical mile.

Fisheries New Zealand consulted on the application 3 times between 2012 and 2016, resulting in Ngāti Awa reducing the size of the proposed area to address concerns of commercial fishers.

In 2018, the then Minister for Oceans and Fisheries deferred a decision on the application due to its potential impact on commercial fishers. Ngāti Awa stated that further reductions of the proposed area would erode their capacity to exercise customary rights and impair their ability to meet their obligation of kaitiakitanga over their important customary fishing grounds. 

In 2024, Ngāti Awa and Fisheries New Zealand agreed to proceed with the application with the offshore boundaries extending to approximately 500 metres.

Ngāti Awa and Fisheries New Zealand consulted with the local community between July and September 2024, and held a hui with the local community to discuss the application on 21 August 2024.

Find out about the consultation with the local community (closed 16 September 2024)

About mātaitai reserves

A mātaitai reserve is an identified traditional fishing ground which tangata whenua have a special relationship with. Mātaitai reserves are limited to fisheries waters and do not include any land area. Mātaitai reserves do not change any existing arrangements for access to private land.

Mātaitai reserves also do not affect private landowners’ land titles, or their ability to exercise resource consents for such things as taking water or extracting gravel or sand. Resource consents are managed under the Resource Management Act 1991.

Mātaitai reserves do not change the existing recreational fishing rules however, commercial fishing is banned in a mātaitai reserve.

Mātaitai reserves do not have an impact on whitebait or trout fishing.

Find out more about mātaitai reserves

Fisheries (Kaimoana Customary Fishing) Regulations 1998 – NZ Legislation 

Submissions are public information

Note that all, part, or a summary of your submission may be published on this website. Most often this happens when we issue a document that reviews the submissions received.

People can also ask for copies of submissions under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). The OIA says we must make the content of submissions available unless we have good reason for withholding it. Those reasons are detailed in sections 6 and 9 of the OIA.

If you think there are grounds to withhold specific information from publication, make this clear in your submission or contact us. Reasons may include that it discloses commercially sensitive or personal information. However, any decision MPI makes to withhold details can be reviewed by the Ombudsman, who may direct us to release it.

Official Information Act 1982 – NZ Legislation

Shellfish biotoxin warning for part of Bay of Plenty

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

New Zealand Food Safety (NZFS) is advising the public not to collect or consume shellfish gathered from an area of the Bay of Plenty due to the presence of paralytic shellfish toxins.

“Routine tests on tuatua from Waihi Beach have shown levels of paralytic shellfish toxins more than double the safe limit,” says NZFS deputy director-general Vincent Arbuckle.

The warning extends from the southern end of Pauanui Beach down to the entrance of Tauranga Harbour, by Mount Maunganui. The warning also includes Tauranga Harbour.

“Please do not gather and eat shellfish from this area because anyone doing so could get sick.

“Affected shellfish include bivalve shellfish such as mussels, oysters, tuatua, pipi, toheroa, cockles and scallops, as well as pūpū (cat’s eyes) and Cook’s turban. Kina are still safe to eat.

“It’s also important to know that cooking the shellfish does not remove the toxin.”

Symptoms of paralytic shellfish poisoning usually appear within 10 minutes to 3 hours of eating and may include:

  • numbness and a tingling (prickly feeling) around the mouth, face, hands, and feet
  • difficulty swallowing or breathing
  • dizziness and headache
  • nausea and vomiting
  • diarrhoea
  • paralysis and respiratory failure and, in severe cases, death.

Pāua, crab and crayfish may still be eaten if the gut has been completely removed prior to cooking, as toxins accumulate in the gut. If the gut is not removed, its contents could contaminate the meat during the cooking process. Finfish are not affected by this public health warning, but we advise gutting the fish and discarding the liver before cooking.

NZFS has had no notifications of associated illness.

If anyone becomes ill after eating shellfish from an area where a public health warning has been issued, phone Healthline for advice on 0800 61 11 16, or seek medical attention immediately. You are also advised to contact your nearest public health unit and keep any leftover shellfish in case it can be tested.

“NZFS is monitoring shellfish in the region and will notify the public of any changes to the situation,” says Mr Arbuckle.

Commercially harvested shellfish – sold in shops and supermarkets or exported – is subject to strict water and flesh monitoring programmes by NZFS to ensure they are safe to eat.

For further information and general enquiries, call MPI on 0800 00 83 33 or email info@mpi.govt.nz

For media enquiries, contact the media team on 029 894 0328.

Find out more

Shellfish biotoxin alerts

Subscribe to shellfish biotoxins to receive email alerts

See signage in the affected area.

Podcast about shellfish contamination

Collecting shellfish and keeping them safe [PDF, 1.4 MB]

Causes and symptoms of toxic shellfish poisoning

About toxic algal blooms

Food safety for seafood gatherers booklet [PDF, 1.2 MB]

Auckland man who illegally killed and sold pigs fined $7,500

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

An Auckland man was fined $7,500 in Pukekohe District Court after being found guilty of cruelty to pigs which he illegally processed and sold.

Anitema Tuungafasi Pulu (54) was on Friday (15 November 2024) sentenced on 3 representative charges under the Animal Welfare Act and the Animal Products Act in the Pukekohe District Court following a successful prosecution by the Ministry for Primary Industries, says MPI director of investigations and compliance support, Gary Orr.

Between September 2022 and May 2023, MPI covert investigators went to Mr Pulu’s Pukekohe property 6 times. They found Mr Pulu killing pigs inhumanely.  

In November 2022, he was served a notice of direction under the Animal Products Act which prohibited him from killing or selling animals, but he ignored the directive. 

“The distress and suffering he caused these pigs was unacceptable. In addition to his animal welfare offences, Mr Pulu neglected to register his business as required under the Animal Products Act. That means he tried to avoid the important checks and balances in our food safety system which are there to keep consumers safe,” says Gary Orr.

Animal welfare is everyone’s responsibility and MPI strongly encourages any member of the public who is aware of animal ill-treatment or cruelty to report it to the MPI animal welfare complaints freephone 0800 00 83 33.

For further information and general enquiries, email info@mpi.govt.nz

For media enquiries, contact the media team on 029 894 0328.