Recall of specific batches of Ārepa drinks as they may cause injury due to a packaging fault

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

New Zealand Food Safety (NZFS) is supporting Alphagen NZ Limited in its recall of specific batches of Ārepa brand The Brain Drink as it may cause injury due to a packaging fault (chipped top of glass bottle).

“The concern with some 300ml bottles of Ārepa’s The Brain Drink for Performance is that due to a packaging fault the glass on the top of the bottle maybe chipped,” says NZFS deputy director-general Vincent Arbuckle.

Batch details of the specific products are on the NZFS recall page.

“If you have any of these affected products at home, don’t drink them. You can return them to the place of purchase for a refund. If that’s not possible, throw them out.”

The affected products – which are sold at supermarkets and retailers nationwide – have been removed from store shelves.

They have been exported to Australia and NZFS has contacted the relevant authorities.

Visit NZFS’s recall page for batch details, up-to-date information and photographs of the affected product.

NZFS has received a notification of associated injury.

“As is our usual practice, NZFS will work with Alphagen to understand how this happened and implement corrective actions,” says Mr Arbuckle.

The vast majority of food sold in New Zealand is safe, but sometimes problems can occur. Help keep yourself and your family safe by subscribing to our recall alerts. Information on how to subscribe is on the NZFS food recall page.

For more information please email: NZFoodSafety_media@mpi.govt.nz

For media enquiries, contact the media team on 029 894 0328.

Companies, directors, and managers fined more than $1.6 million

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

A group of meat processing companies, directors and managers have been fined a total of $1,629,500.00 for deliberately and illegally altering exported tallow for profit, following an investigation and prosecution by New Zealand Food Safety.

In a sentence released today by the Manukau District Court, Tuakau Proteins Limited, Taranaki By-Products Limited, Wallace Proteins Limited, Stephen Dahlenburg, Paul Drake, Glenn Smith, Glenninburg Holdings Limited, SBT Group Limited, GrainCorp Commodity Management (NZ) Limited and GrainCorp Liquid Terminals NZ Limited, were all sentenced on various charges under the Animal Products Act.

Tallow is rendered from animal fat into a range of products, in this case it was exported for use in biofuels. Its production is regulated under the Animal Products Act and exporters must meet domestic New Zealand standards with a Risk Management Programme (RMP) along with the rules of importing countries.

The defendants worked together to mix tallow with adulterants, including out of specification products containing unknown quantities of unknown various fats and oils, says New Zealand Food Safety deputy director general Vincent Arbuckle.

“The price of tallow is based on its free fatty acid level (FFA) and the lower the level, the higher the price. By illegally adding other oils, the defendants were able to command a higher price by lowering the free fatty acid levels. Following a lengthy and complex investigation, food safety investigators found this offending was deliberate to maximise profits.”

Mr Arbuckle says these companies’ directors and managers knew their responsibilities under the law.

“The rules for export are there for a reason – to ensure the product is fit for its intended purpose and meets the requirements of importing countries.

“While there was no food safety issue identified with the offending, people and organisations that deliberately try to get around the rules can damage New Zealand’s valuable trade reputation which has been built over generations by high quality exports and backed by our robust food safety system.”

The investigation was sparked by a whistleblower who notified New Zealand Food Safety that vegetable oil may have been blended with tallow for export.

“We followed up on the tip and the investigation broadened over time as investigators gathered evidence. They were eventually able to prove that several companies and individuals worked together to illegally export more than 8,000 tonnes of non-compliant tallow.

“Tuakau Proteins Ltd, Taranaki By-Products Ltd and Wallace Proteins Ltd all owned rendering plants that make tallow. These companies, managers and directors worked together to create this product.

“The prosecution was the result of a meticulous and long-running investigation which made connections between multiple defendants and proved deliberate offending.

“Today’s result is a credit to the persistence and expertise of food safety investigators who stuck with what was a very complex case to bring the defendants before the courts. Their efforts send a strong message to those who would try to circumvent the rules for profit – we will pursue and prosecute,” Mr Arbuckle said.

For further information and general enquiries, call MPI on 0800 00 83 33 or email info@mpi.govt.nz

For media enquiries, contact the media team on 029 894 0328.

Controls lifted at poultry farm after virus eradicated

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

Movement controls have been lifted from Mainland Poultry’s Hillgrove Farm in Otago, after the successful eradication of H7N6 strain of high pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) says Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) chief veterinary officer Dr Mary Van Andel.

When HPAI H7N6 was detected in poultry at the property in early December, the Ministry for Primary Industries moved swiftly to stamp out the virus.

“While there is still work to be done, the lifting of movement controls is a significant milestone in the response and means that Mainland Poultry can begin the process of returning to business,” says Dr van Andel.

“We’re grateful to Mainland Poultry, which did the right thing in notifying us as soon as an exotic disease was suspected and for working with us in partnership to successfully stamp out this disease.”

MPI immediately put strict movement controls on the property to prevent goods or anything else that might be carrying the virus leaving the property.

Dr van Andel says more than 5,600 tests were carried out on samples from poultry and wild birds, including from 36 flocks across 5 farms linked to Mainland’s Hillgrove property. HPAI was not found anywhere other than Hillgrove, giving confidence that the disease had been contained and stamped out.

Chickens on the farm were humanely euthanised and disposed of in a secure landfill, along with eggs, litter and manure from the farm. This was followed by an extensive cleaning and disinfection process.

“The processes we have followed – depopulation and disposal, decontamination of the site and extensive surveillance – give us confidence that the virus has been eradicated.”

MPI staff will continue to support Mainland as the farm is repopulated.

“Good progress is being made to restore trade, with around $300 million of trade in poultry products recovered to date.”

MPI has worked with overseas government counterparts and industry partners in New Zealand to meet market requirements and has also proposed alternative assurances to some markets. MPI continues to work towards the reopening of trade for others.

Dr van Andel says testing indicates that the infection at Hillgrove is likely to have occurred after free-range laying hens foraging outside were exposed to wild birds with a low pathogenicity (LPAI) virus strain, which then mutated in the hens to become HPAI.

“This is the first time such an event in New Zealand has been documented and our first case of HPAI. We’ve learned a lot from this response that will help us to prepare for HPAI H5N1 if it spreads here.”

Read more about the latest update at our website: A strain of bird flu (H7N6) in Otago

For further information and general enquiries, call MPI on 0800 00 83 33 or email info@mpi.govt.nz

For media enquiries, contact the media team on 029 894 0328.

Frozen anchovies recalled due to the presence of a marine biotoxin

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

New Zealand Food Safety is supporting Pendarves Ltd in its recall of a specific range of imported frozen anchovies due to the presence of a marine biotoxin.

“Testing of the product has found the presence of domonic acid, a neurotoxin produced by certain algae that can cause amnesic shellfish poisoning in humans,” says New Zealand Food Safety’s acting deputy director-general Claire McDonald.

“These products should not be eaten. You can return them to the place of purchase for a refund. If that’s not possible, throw it out.”

The affected products were sold at a small number of supermarkets and specialty stores.

Visit New Zealand Food Safety’s recall page for up-to-date information and photographs of the affected product.

New Zealand Food Safety has not received any notifications of associated illness.

Symptoms are mainly gastrointestinal, especially at low toxin levels. These usually appear within 24 hours of eating and may include vomiting, nausea, diarrhoea, and abdominal cramps.

In more serious cases there can be neurological symptoms. These can take up to 3 days to develop and can range from headaches and dizziness to memory loss and, for severe cases, coma.

If you have consumed any of this product and are concerned for your health, contact your health professional, or call Healthline on 0800 611 116 for free advice.

The products have been removed from store shelves and have not been exported.

The vast majority of food sold in New Zealand is safe, but sometimes problems can occur. Help keep yourself and your family safe by subscribing to our recall alerts.

Information on how to subscribe is on the New Zealand Food Safety food recall page.

More information about illness caused by algae, including amnesic shellfish poisoning, can be found on our website.

What is toxic shellfish poisoning?

For general enquiries, call MPI on 0800 00 83 33 or email info@mpi.govt.nz

For media enquiries, contact the media team on 029 894 0328.

Proposed updates to forest types and default carbon tables for exotic forests in the NZ Emissions Trading Scheme and other regulatory amendments

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

Have your say

The Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) is consulting on changes to improve the default carbon tables for exotic forests in the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS). Default carbon tables are used by small-scale forestry participants to calculate the carbon stored in their forests. We are also consulting on other technical regulatory amendments for forestry in the NZ ETS.

We want your feedback about the proposals – summaries are on this page and full details are in the discussion document.

You can send us your submission from 15 April until 5pm on 16 May 2025.

Discussion document

Proposed changes to forestry in the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS)  [PDF, 2.1 MB]

Related documents

Evaluating the potential for a default carbon table for redwoods and an updated default table for the exotic softwoods forest type for use in the ETS summary report [PDF, 3.3 MB]

Section D: Technical report: Evaluating alternative carbon modelling and analysis models for redwoods [PDF, 2 MB]

Section E: Impacts of silviculture and coppicing on carbon stocks in redwoods [PDF, 3.3 MB]

Updated default tables for the exotic hardwoods forest type for use in the ETS [PDF, 2.7 MB]

Updating radiata pine carbon yield tables for use in the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme [PDF, 3.6 MB]

Proposed updated and new default carbon tables in Excel format [XLSX, 86 KB]

Introduction and summaries of the proposals

The Maximising Forest Carbon Programme aims to improve how we measure, recognise, and reward carbon storage in our native and exotic forests. One of the ways it will do this is by improving the accuracy of the default carbon tables.

Find out about Maximising Forest Carbon Programme

Summary of proposed changes to the default carbon tables for exotic forests

Participants with less than 100 hectares of forest land registered in the NZ ETS use the default carbon tables to calculate their forest’s carbon storage. The tables were developed in 2007–2008 using the best data available at the time but have not been meaningfully updated since.

Tree species in the NZ ETS are grouped into 5 forest types for carbon calculations. These are:

  • Pinus radiata (radiata pine)
  • Douglas-fir
  • exotic hardwoods
  • exotic softwoods
  • indigenous (native).

We are proposing updates to default carbon tables for the following types of exotic forest:

  • exotic softwoods
  • exotic hardwoods
  • Pinus radiata (radiata pine)

We’re also proposing to introduce a new forest type and default tables for redwoods. Redwoods are currently in the exotic softwoods forest type but under our proposals redwoods would be separated from exotic softwoods.

These improvements will help to ensure:

  • the forest types in the NZ ETS reflect the main types of forest grown in New Zealand
  • the default carbon tables provide robust carbon sequestration estimates
  • small-scale forestry participants are fairly rewarded for their carbon sequestration.

Summary of proposed regulatory amendments in the NZ ETS

Separate to the default tables proposals, we are also proposing some smaller amendments to the Climate Change (Forestry) Regulations 2022. These changes address technical issues. They are: 

  • clarifying whether young forests that fail to thrive should be considered first or subsequent rotation under averaging accounting
  • updating the deadline for the input calculator to align more closely to the deadline for emissions returns
  • streamlining the processing for transmissions of interest
  • simplifying the treatment of small areas
  • future-proofing the method of spatial measurement used for determining land area.

Making your submission

Send us your feedback on the proposals by 5pm on 16 May 2025.

You can submit feedback on the whole document, or just the areas relevant to you.

There are 3 ways you can make a submission – using an online form, or by emailing or posting your submission. 

Online

Complete our online submission form – Alchemer

Email or post

If you are sending us a submission by email or post, we encourage you to use the submission template. The submission template has the same questions as the online form.

Optional submission form template [DOCX, 120 KB]

When you have completed your submission, email it to etsforestrychanges@mpi.govt.nz

Or post it to:

Maximising Forest Carbon Programme
Te Uru Rākau – New Zealand Forest Service
PO Box 2526
Wellington 6140.

Include the title of the consultation document with your submission: Proposed changes to forestry in the NZ ETS.

Additionally, you may choose to include the following optional details:

  • your name and title
  • your organisation’s name (if you are submitting on behalf of an organisation, and whether your submission represents the whole organisation or a section of it)
  • your contact details (such as phone number, address, and email).

Providing this information is optional. If you do include it, it will help us gain more insights from your submission.

If you’d like more information, email etsforestrychanges@mpi.govt.nz

Submissions are public information

Note that all, part, or a summary of your submission may be published on this website. Most often this happens when we issue a document that reviews the submissions received.

People can also ask for copies of submissions under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). The OIA says we must make the content of submissions available unless we have good reason for withholding it. Those reasons are detailed in sections 6 and 9 of the OIA.

If you think there are grounds to withhold specific information from publication, make this clear in your submission or contact us. Reasons may include that it discloses commercially sensitive or personal information. However, any decision MPI makes to withhold details can be reviewed by the Ombudsman, who may direct us to release it.

Official Information Act 1982 – NZ Legislation

Successful end to fruit fly response on Auckland’s North Shore

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

Controls on the movement of fruit and vegetables in the Auckland North Shore suburb of Birkdale have been lifted after no further evidence of the Oriental fruit fly was found in the area, says Mike Inglis, Biosecurity New Zealand commissioner North.

The decision to end the operation follows 7 weeks of intensive fruit fly trapping and inspections of hundreds of kilograms of fruit.

Mr Inglis thanked residents and businesses in the affected area for their support of the movement controls, keeping an eye out for fruit flies, and safely disposing of fruit in provided bins.

“Getting to this point wouldn’t have been possible without the support of the North Shore community. I can’t stress enough how vital this work has been to protect our horticulture sector.

“We are satisfied that with no further detections, the Controlled Area Notice restrictions can be lifted, and response operations closed.”

The biosecurity wheelie bins that have dotted the neighbourhood will now be removed and road signs will be dismantled.

“Our nationwide routine surveillance will continue with our system of nearly 8,000 fruit fly traps spread across the country and more than 4,600 of these in the Auckland area. These traps are set for 3 exotic fruit fly species of concern: the Queensland fruit fly, Mediterranean fruit fly, and Oriental fruit flies.”

Mr Inglis says Biosecurity New Zealand staff will be out in the community today, handing out flyers about the response closure and personally thanking residents and business owners for their contribution to the effort.

“I’d also like to acknowledge the good work of our people and our partners across the horticulture sector. By working together, and responding quickly, we have managed this situation well.”

Key figures

  • More than 2,000 individual visits were made to check the 116 fruit fly traps in the Birkdale area throughout the response.
  • Over 470 biosecurity bins were distributed in the community to collect produce waste for safe disposal.
  • More than 954kg of fruit were collected and examined for any signs of fruit fly eggs or larvae.
  • More than 70 Biosecurity New Zealand staff were involved throughout the response.

For further information and general enquiries, email info@mpi.govt.nz

For media enquiries, contact the media team on 029 894 0328.

Restauranteur placed on 6 months home detention, fined $20,000 for selling recalled food

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

A Christchurch restauranteur has been placed on 6 months home detention and fined $20,000 for selling food that had been recalled.

In November last year, the owner of Samurai Bowl in Colombo Street, Xinchen Liu, pleaded guilty to one charge under the Food Act for trading in food that was subject to a recall because of unsafe levels of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) bacteria being found in some frozen meals.

Ms Liu was sentenced in the Christchurch District Court (8 April 2025) following a successful prosecution by New Zealand Food Safety.

“The bacteria found in the food can cause nausea, vomiting, stomach cramps and diarrhoea. The consequences can be serious for people with compromised immune systems.

“Food recalls are conducted to protect consumers from potential harm. People rightly expect food businesses sell food that is safe and suitable.” says New Zealand Food Safety acting deputy director-general, Jenny Bishop.

A verifier observed routine testing results undertaken by the business, which found unsafe levels of the bacteria S. aureus in samples of frozen ramen meals. MPI’s New Zealand Food Safety was notified, as required under the Food Act. The bacteria find led to a recall on 1 June 2019 of all frozen Samurai Bowl ramen meals made since Ms Liu had taken over the business. Ms Liu confirmed the recall had gone ahead, providing evidential pictures to food safety officers and the recall was closed off in August that year by New Zealand Food Safety.

“Most people do the right thing, but Ms Liu didn’t do as she claimed and stored the meals in freezers. Some of them were defrosted and made available to staff. Miso soup and meat from recalled meals was also served to customers at her restaurant. This was deliberate and reckless behaviour and Ms Liu’s actions had potential to cause sickness and health risk for a number of customers,” says Jenny Bishop.

For further information and general enquiries, call MPI on 0800 00 83 33 or email info@mpi.govt.nz

For media enquiries, contact the media team on 029 894 0328.

Farmer banned from owning farm animals for 2 years, placed on 6 months community detention over lack of food and welfare for sheep

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

A Woodville farmer has been banned from owning or being in charge of farm animals and placed on 6 months community detention over a lack of food and welfare that led to 55 sheep being euthanised and others suffering.

Noel Thomas Cunningham (64) was sentenced (7 April 2025) in the Palmerston North District on 3 charges he pleaded guilty to under the Animal Welfare Act, following a successful prosecution by the Ministry for Primary Industries.

“When animal welfare inspectors visited the farm, they found infrastructure including fencing and water reticulation, particularly on the 40-hectare sheep block, showed maintenance and management had been lacking for some time. Most of the sheep fences were not stock proof and pasture was tired and indicative of poor grazing management.  An open fronted shed containing multiple sheep carcasses, along with shallow graves in an adjacent paddock indicated a history of poor care and management of the sheep,” says MPI manager animal welfare and NAIT compliance central, Gray Harrison.

“Many of the existing sheep were underweight and displaying signs of lice infestation, and some had to be euthanised to prevent further stress and suffering.

“This level of neglect is unacceptable. When we find evidence of it, we will take action.”

An MPI animal welfare inspector and 2 veterinarians inspected a total of 322 animals. They found 25 recently dead sheep and a number of dead newborn lambs. 55 sheep had to be euthanised because they were so thin and affected by parasites. 90 ewes that were also very thin were not euthanised because it would have compromised the health of their lambs, and the welfare needs of 179 other sheep were not being met.

“Mr Cunningham was an experienced farmer, yet we found no evidence of sheep management or routine husbandry being carried out. Some of the sheep that died were found near water courses, stuck in mud and at various stages of decomposition. Most farmers do the right thing for their animals. Mr Cunningham failed the basics – providing quality feed and good access to water, along with timely care,” says Gray Harrison.

Animal welfare is everyone’s responsibility and MPI strongly encourages any member of the public who is aware of animal ill-treatment or cruelty to report it to the MPI animal welfare complaints freephone 0800 00 83 33.

For further information and general enquiries, email info@mpi.govt.nz

For media enquiries, contact the media team on 029 894 0328.

Recall of Pams Afghan Oat Baked Bars due to foreign matter (metal)

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

New Zealand Food Safety is supporting Foodstuffs Own Brands Limited in its recall of Pams brand Afghan Oat Baked Bars as the product may contain foreign matter (metal).

“The concern with these oat bars is that some metal from manufacturing equipment may have got into the product during the production process,” says New Zealand Food Safety deputy director-general Vincent Arbuckle.

“If you have any Pams brand Afghan Oat Baked Bars with Batch L5017 and a Best Before of 16/01/2026 don’t eat it. You can return it to the place of purchase for a refund. If that’s not possible, throw it out.”

The affected products are sold at Four Square, Gilmours, New World, Pak’nSave, Social Supermarket, and Trents nationwide.

The products have been removed from store shelves and have not been exported.

For up-to-date information and photographs of the affected product, visit:

New Zealand Food Safety has not received any notifications of associated injury. 

“As is our usual practice, New Zealand Food Safety will work with Foodstuffs Own Brands Limited to understand how this happened and prevent its recurrence,” says Mr Arbuckle.

The vast majority of food sold in New Zealand is safe, but sometimes problems can occur.  Help keep yourself and your family safe by subscribing to our recall alerts. Information on how to subscribe is on the New Zealand Food Safety food recall page. 

Recalled food products list

Second notice of an application for a mātaitai reserve at southern Hokianga Harbour and adjoining waterways, Northland

Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

Your views sought

Ngā tāngata kaitiaki ō Te Hikutū (Te Hikutū Hapū) has applied for a mātaitai reserve (“Te Mātaitai ō Te Hikutū”) in the southern part of the Hokianga Harbour, Northland.

Fisheries New Zealand invites submissions from persons having a fishing interest in the stock or stocks in the proposed mātaitai reserve.

Te Hikutū Hapū and Fisheries New Zealand have previously consulted the local community on the application.

Find out about the first consultation with the local community (closed 13 May 2024)

What’s being proposed?

The proposed area includes the fisheries waters within a portion of southern Hokianga Harbour extending approximately 500 metres from the mean high-water mark, between Koutu Point and the Whirinaki River mouth, and adjoining freshwater fisheries waters.

Te Hikutū Hapū amended the original proposed area following the first consultation with the local community.

Consultation documents

Map of proposed mātaitai [PDF, 2 MB]

Te Mātaitai ō Te Hikutū application [PDF, 9.3 MB]

Making your submission

Submissions close at 5pm on Monday 19 May 2025.

Email your submission to FMSubmissions@mpi.govt.nz

While we prefer email, you can post your submission to:

Fisheries management – Spatial allocations
Fisheries New Zealand
PO Box 2526
Wellington 6140.

Public notices about this consultation

Public notices about the call for submissions are scheduled to appear in the Northern Advocate and Northland Age on 3 April 2025.

About mātaitai reserves

A mātaitai reserve is an identified traditional fishing ground which tangata whenua have a special relationship with. Mātaitai reserves are limited to fisheries waters and do not include any land area. Mātaitai reserves do not change any existing arrangements for access to private land.

Mātaitai reserves also do not affect private landowners’ land titles, or their ability to exercise resource consents for such things as taking water or extracting gravel or sand. Resource consents are managed under the Resource Management Act 1991.

When a mātaitai reserve is established, the recreational fishing rules do not change. However, the Tangata Kaitiaki for a mātaitai reserve may propose changes to the rules at a later date.

Commercial fishing is prohibited in a mātaitai reserve but can be reinstated at the request of the Tangata Kaitiaki for the mātaitai reserve for specified species, quantity or time period.

Mātaitai reserves do not have an impact on whitebait or trout fishing.

Find out more about mātaitai reserves

Fisheries (Kaimoana Customary Fishing) Regulations 1998 – NZ Legislation

Submissions are public information

Note that all, part, or a summary of your submission may be published on this website. Most often this happens when we issue a document that reviews the submissions received.

People can also ask for copies of submissions under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). The OIA says we must make the content of submissions available unless we have good reason for withholding it. Those reasons are detailed in sections 6 and 9 of the OIA.

If you think there are grounds to withhold specific information from publication, make this clear in your submission or contact us. Reasons may include that it discloses commercially sensitive or personal information. However, any decision MPI makes to withhold details can be reviewed by the Ombudsman, who may direct us to release it.

Official Information Act 1982 – NZ Legislation