Programme eligibility – Youth Guarantee

Source: Tertiary Education Commission

A tertiary education organisation (TEO) can only use YG funding for New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework (NZQCF) qualifications and their associated programmes and courses.
Before the Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) can consider funding a qualification, the TEO must first obtain approval and accreditation for a programme leading to the qualification from the New Zealand Qualifications Authority (NZQA). Once NZQA approval is obtained, the TEO may seek TEC funding approval.
To find a current list of qualifications and courses approved for YG funding for your organisation, use the qualification search or course search on the Services for Tertiary Education Organisations (STEO) application.
For the full programme eligibility requirements, see the Youth Guarantee funding conditions for the relevant year.
Minimum requirements
YG Fund funding provision should:
lead to the award of a qualification that is either NCEA at Level 1, 2 or 3; or another National or New Zealand Certificate at Level 1, 2 or 3 on the NZQCF
include literacy and numeracy provision
comprise part of a recognised pathway (as determined by NZQA) towards one or more vocational qualifications at Level 4 and above on the NZQCF
be aligned to the Vocational Pathways (if it leads to a Level 1 or 2 NCEA qualification)
be provided by tutors who are appropriately qualified.
For example, from 2023 0.5 EFTS means:
40 credits for a programme leading to a Level 1 or 2 qualification, and
60 credits for all other programmes.
For more information on Vocational Pathways and the list of standards in each pathway see Youth Guarantee.
Youth Guarantee delivery must be face-to-face (for example, not delivered via distance learning or in a work-based setting) unless we authorise you in writing to use an alternative delivery method.
Submitting a qualification for access to YG funding
Qualification and course approval is carried out through our section of the Data and Exchange Platform (DXP) Services for Tertiary Education Organisations (STEO) application. Through this application each TEO:
registers and maintains qualifications and courses for funding
updates qualification, course and delivery site details, and
submits its Single Data Return (SDR).
For technical information on using DXP STEO to obtain approval for qualification eligibility to access funding, see the STEO User Guide.
A TEO approved to receive YG funding may request to deliver alternative or additional qualifications to those listed in its Mix of Provision (MoP).
When submitting a new qualification for access to funding, we recommend that you:
consider whether it meets the eligibility criteria for YG funding;
consider whether it aligns with:

check on availability of funding, particularly if:
funding is being sought for Level 3
there will be a change in the type of delivery (trades/non-trades funding), or
delivery is being proposed at a new delivery site; and

complete external quality assurance body requirements in a timely manner (this will ensure that each student who is enrolled in the approved qualification will have timely access to student allowances and the Student Loan Scheme, if eligible).
Once we have received the necessary information, we will decide whether or not the qualification meets the eligibility requirements for YG funding. For the full eligibility requirements, see the Youth Guarantee funding conditions for the relevant year.
If we approve the qualification as eligible for funding, we will release your YG MoP, so you can revise and submit it to us for approval.
Process for approving a qualification for funding
Determining eligibility
To enable us to determine whether or not to approve a qualification as eligible to access YG funding, we require the following information when the qualification is submitted for approval through the DXP STEO application:
the provider code (EDUMIS number) of the TEO seeking the approval
the qualification code used on the New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework (NZQCF)
the title of the proposed qualification
the number of learning hours per week
the number of full-time teaching weeks per year
the equivalent full-time student (EFTS) value of the qualification calculated using the following methods:
credits
learning hours
full-time weeks, and approval documents from the relevant quality assurance body.

When approving a qualification as eligible to access YG funding, we will:
check that the details of the programme leading to award of the qualification are consistent with your quality assurance approval for the programme
consider whether the EFTS value of the qualification is correct
check that the course, programme and/or qualification are eligible in accordance with the funding mechanism and/or funding conditions
consider whether eligible learners enrolled in the qualification will be able to access the Student Allowance/Student Loan Schemes, and
consider whether delivery of the qualification aligns with our investment priorities, what the stakeholder needs are, and the extent of existing similar provision.
We will not backdate approval for access to the Student Allowance/Student Loan Schemes. Therefore, we require this information from you at least four weeks before the start of tuition for the qualification. This will ensure that each learner who is enrolled in an approved course or programme can access financial support if eligible.
Enrolling learners in a newly approved qualification
You can start enrolling learners in the programme leading to the new qualification, and access funding, after the qualification has been:
listed in your YG MoP with regions of delivery and EFTS, and
we have approved your MoP for funding.
A detailed description of the required information is set out below.
TEO/provider code
You must give us the four-digit code assigned by the Ministry of Education to uniquely identify your TEO. A list of the four-digit codes assigned to each TEO is set out in Appendix 1 of the SDR Manual.
Qualification code
You must supply the qualification code. The format of the qualification code is alphanumeric, usually two letters followed by four numbers. Select the New Zealand Certificate/Diploma from the National Qualification List on the DXP STEO application.
If you intend to offer a New Zealand Certificate listed on the NZQCF, use the NZQCF code for the qualification for all references to the qualification.
A TEO can submit its New Zealand Qualifications Authority (NZQA) approval for one programme that leads to a New Zealand qualification in STEO. When additional programmes are approved by NZQA that lead to the same New Zealand qualification, you must send the approval to the TEC so we can agree to the delivery (do not submit the documentation through STEO). Programmes leading to New Zealand qualifications should not be submitted under a local/provider code in this situation.
Qualification codes for trades and non-trades (and NCEA)
If you have NZQA programme approval for a trade programme and a non-trade programme for the same qualification (ie, one learner is enrolled on 50% of P1, C1, L1 courses while another is enrolled on 50% A1, J1), you need to set up two separate local qualification codes to reflect these different programmes.Only qualifications at Levels 2 and 3 can be funded at the trade rate.
Note: Where the qualification will only be delivered as either trade or non-trade, you only need to set up the relevant qualification code. 
A TEO approved by NZQA to deliver the National Certificate of Educational Achievement (NCEA) Level 2 with a Vocational Pathway needs to set this up in STEO using the qualification codes below.

Code 

Title

Level

Description

NCEAL1

National Certificate in Educational Achievement L1

L01

YG Non-Trades

NCEP1T

Construction and Infrastructure Trade L2

L02

YG Trades

NCEP1N

Construction and Infrastructure Non-trade L2

L02

YG Non-Trades

NCEP2T

Manufacturing and Technology Trade L2

L02

YG Trades

NCEP2N

Manufacturing and Technology Non-trade L2

L02

YG Non-Trades

NCEP3T

Primary Industries Trade L2

L02

YG Trades

NCEP3N

Primary Industries Non-trade L2

L02

YG Non-Trades

NCEP4T

Service Industries Trade L2

L02

YG Trades

NCEP4N

Service Industries Non-trade L2

L02

YG Non-Trades

NCEP5T

Social and Community Services Trade L2

L02

YG Trades

NCEP5N

Social and Community Services Non-trade L2

L02

YG Non-Trades

NCEP6T

Creative Industries Trade L2

L02

YG Trades

NCEP6N

Creative Industries Non-trade L2

L02

YG Non-Trades

NCEA3T

National Certificate in Educational Achievement Trade L3

L03

YG Trades

NCEA3N

National Certificate in Educational Achievement Non-trade L3

L03

YG Non-Trades

 Use the qualification code system below to enter the trade/non-trade codes in STEO.
“C” represents a National Certificate, whereas “Z” represents a New Zealand Certificate.
This is followed by the four-digit NZQCF code for the qualification.
This is followed by “T” identifying it as a trade programme (50% or more of the provision is trades), or “N” identifying it as a non-trade programme (50% or more of the provision is non-trades).

Code 

Title

Level

Description

CxxxxT

National Certificate in Xxxxx Level 3

L03

YG Trades

CxxxxN

National Certificate in Xxxxx Level 3

L03

YG Non-Trades

ZxxxxT

New Zealand Certificate in Xxxxx Level 3

L03

YG Trades

ZxxxxN

New Zealand Certificate in Xxxxx Level 3

L03

YG Non-Trades

Title of qualification
You must give us the title of the qualification(s) for which you are seeking approval for funding.
This does not mean the title of the programme that NZQA approved, unless the programme title and qualification title are the same.
Duration
You must provide us with information about the duration of the programme, specifically the learning hours and full-time teaching weeks as approved by NZQA.
Learning hours
NZQA defines “learning hours” as all planned learning activities leading towards the achievement of programme or qualification learning outcomes.
Types of learning activities include but are not limited to:
lecturer and tutor contact hours, including workshops and tutorials
tests and assignments
supervised practical placements
study time
self-directed learning activities that you expect the student to engage with/participate in, and
examination periods.
There are three fields for types of learning activities on the DXP STEO application. A TEO should break down its various learning activities, and enter hours in the STEO fields below as accurately as possible, based on the guidance below. The three fields are:
teaching hours each week – eg, face-to-face classroom/online/field trip/simulation time, tutorials, on-site assignments, assessments and examinations
work experience hours each week – eg, time the learner spends practising or learning skills relevant to their study programme in a workplace; this includes a teaching workplace, which may be on-site, as long as it operates as a commercial enterprise, and
self-directed study hours each week – “self-directed study” means only TEO-directed study carried out by the learner; eg, time the learner spends on off-site assignments (such as homework assignments), and TEO-directed reading and study hours, that the learner must complete in their own time. Note: self-directed study does not include self-directed activities that the learner initiates.
Note: A TEO will need to use a consistently applied rationale, in terms of which activities constitute what programme learning hours in STEO for each of the three fields above.
In relation to the number of learning hours in the qualification, you must give us the:
number of teaching hours each week (see above)
number of hours each week of work experience (see above)
number of self-directed learning hours each week (see above)
total number of learning hours each week
total number of learning hours in each year
number of years it will take to complete the qualification, and
total number of learning hours in the qualification (number of learning hours in each year multiplied by the number of years).
Total learning hours in STEO must be the same as the total programme/qualification learning hours approved by NZQA. We expect actual delivery to align with the total learning hours and the learning activities approved by NZQA. This means we expect each TEO to regularly review the delivery of its programme(s) to ensure they are “right sized” for most learners (recognising that some learners take more or fewer learning hours to achieve a qualification than others).
Note: During audits and investigations we may check whether a TEO’s delivery reflects our and NZQA’s approvals. To do this we triangulate NZQA approval documentation, STEO data, and your information for learners, and compare the information to actual delivery.
Full-time teaching weeks
A full-time teaching week includes the types of learning hours outlined above.
In relation to the number of teaching weeks in each year of the qualification, you must give us the:
number of full-time equivalent teaching weeks
number of weeks of recess in each year
total number of full-time teaching weeks and recess weeks in each year – FTE gross
number of credits on the NZQCF contained in the qualification, and
number of credits that a learner must achieve each year to complete the qualification.
We generally will not approve a qualification for funding that is longer than 34 weeks in a year.
You must not enrol a learner in more than:
1.5 EFTS (120 credits) of Level 1 and/or 2 YG qualification provision in any year, or
1.0 EFTS (120 credits) of Level 3 YG qualification provision in any calendar year.
EFTS value of the qualification
We require the EFTS value of each qualification in order to determine whether a qualification is eligible to access YG funding.
For conditions on assigning EFTS values to qualifications, see YG funding conditions.
The EFTS value of each qualification must be specified to no more than four decimal places. The EFTS value determines the workload involved in each qualification and is required so that we can appropriately fund you to deliver the qualification. 
For the purposes of STEO, MoPs and SDR reporting, the EFTS value is calculated using 120 credits per EFTS for all Level 1–3 qualifications (the standard number of credits that equate to one full-time year of study).
This information must be determined using the following methods:
credits,
learning hours, and
full-time weeks.
Each of the three methods should produce the same result. If they do, we can be confident that a student who is studying for a qualification is undertaking a normal and reasonable workload.
Each method is set out in more detail below.
Credits
A credit measures the average amount of learning that is required to complete the qualification or part of the qualification. 
The EFTS value can be calculated using the credits method by dividing the number of credits for the qualification by 120 (the standard number of credits that equate to one full-time year of study in STEO). 
Example: If a qualification has 60 credits: 60 divided by 120 = 0.5 EFTS.
Learning hours
The EFTS value can be calculated using the learning hours method by dividing the qualification’s total learning hours by 1,200 (the standard number of learning hours that equates to a full-time year of study).
Example: If the total learning hours for one semester in a qualification is 600 hours: 600 divided by 1,200 = 0.5 EFTS.
Full-time weeks
The EFTS value can be calculated using the full-time weeks method, by dividing the length of tuition for the qualification in weeks by 34 (the standard number of weeks that equate to one full-time equivalent teaching or tuition year). 
Example: If the qualification has a length of 17 weeks: 17 divided by 34 = 0.5 EFTS.
EFTS value when a qualification has strands
A qualification may have a range of options or electives with variable credit combinations. These are called strands. Each strand is likely to have a different total EFTS value.
If a qualification has two or more strands, you should determine the EFTS value for each strand. We require the EFTS value of the strand that has the highest EFTS value for our calculations.
You must calculate the EFTS factor of each course in the strand in order to calculate the EFTS value of the strand. The EFTS factor of a course can be determined in the following ways:
Divide the course credits for a qualification that has up to 120 credits by 120.
For a qualification that has more than 120 credits, and we have agreed to fund more than 1 EFTS per student per year, divide the course credits by the credit value of the qualification.
For a qualification that has more than 120 credits, and we have not agreed to fund more than 1 EFTS per student per year, divide the course credits by 120.
Example:

Calculating the EFTS value of a qualification with strands

Strand 1

Credits 

Course EFTS factor 

Strand 2

Credits 

Course EFTS factor

Course 1

15 

0.1250 

Course 1

15 

0.1250

Course 2

15 

0.1250 

Course 2

15

 0.1250

Course 3

26 

0.2167

Course 3

 26 

0.2167

Course 4

10 

0.0833 

Course 6

10 

0.0833

Course 5

0.0500

Course 7

0.0417

 

 

 

Course 8 

0.0333

Totals 

72 

 0.6000 

 

75 

0.6250

 
In this example, if we approve the qualification for funding, it will be approved as 75 credits as this is the credit value of the longest strand. The EFTS value of the qualification is therefore 0.625 (75 credits/120 = 0.625 EFTS).
If an approved qualification in STEO has a value of 1.0 EFTS but more than 120 credits, the credit value of the longest strand is used to determine the course EFTS factor for each strand. This ensures that courses common to both strands have the same EFTS factor.
Example: In this example, the credit value of 150 is used to divide the credits, not 120:

Calculating course EFTS factors in a qualification of more than 120 credits in one year with strands  

Strand 1 

Credits 

Course EFTS factor 

Strand 2

Credits 

Course EFTS factor

Course 1

30 

0.2000 

Course 1

30

0.2000

Course 2

30

0.2000

Course 2

30

0.2000

Course 3

52 

0.3467

Course 3

52 

0.3467

Course 4

20 

0.1333 

Course 6

20

0.1333

Course 5

12

0.0800

Course 7

10

0.0667

 

 

 

Course 8 

8

0.0533

Totals 

144

 0.9600 

 

150 

1.0000

Quality assurance requirements
To be eligible for YG funding, a course must be part of a programme that has been quality assured. For TEOs that receive YG funding, the quality assurance body is the New Zealand Qualifications Authority (NZQA).
To determine whether to approve a qualification for Youth Guarantee funding as part of your MoP, we require evidence in your Investment Plan that NZQA has approved the programme leading to the award of the qualification.
Under Section 101 of the Education and Training Act 2020, the New Zealand Teachers Council is responsible for conducting, in conjunction with quality assurance agencies, approvals of teacher education programmes and qualifications that lead to teacher registration.
Defining a qualification
You must give us the following information that defines the qualification:
the award category code (recognised qualifications have an award qualification category code – refer to Appendix 9 of the SDR Manual)
the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) Level, and the ISCED code of the qualification (refer to Appendix 9 of the SDR Manual)
the level of the qualification on the NZQCF (refer to Appendix 9 of the SDR Manual)
the outcome (ISCED destination) of completing the qualification (for example, whether the qualification is designed to lead the learner directly into the labour market), and
the New Zealand Standard Classification of Education (NZSCED) of the qualification (refer to Appendix 8 of the SDR Manual). 
Making a change to a programme leading to the qualification
To make a change to a programme leading to a qualification, you must first check with NZQA if their approval is required for the change.
Once you have the required approval, you need to reflect the changes in STEO. In doing that, you must meet the requirements of any conditions on making changes to qualifications.
For conditions on making changes to qualifications, see the YG funding conditions.
Information about courses
NZQA approves a programme leading to a qualification, and the TEO then submits the qualification to us through STEO for approval as eligible to access YG funding. We may then agree to fund the qualification.
Following that, the TEO must disaggregate the qualification into component courses in STEO. You must give us all of the following information about each component course in the qualification:
provider code
course code
course title
qualification code
delivery classification
NZSCED field of study
level of the course on the NZQCF
number of credits of the course
funding category of the course
EFTS factor of the course, and
whether the course has embedded literacy and numeracy skill development in the provision.
Some of the key fields required for SDR submission are outlined in more detail below. 
Delivery classification (CLASS)
You are required to classify your courses using the current Delivery Classification Guide.
New Zealand Standard Classification of Education (NZSCED)
The NZSCED is a subject-based classification system that contributes to international reporting, and in some cases may be used to describe the Mix of Provision in your Investment Plan.
All courses must be classified using the NZSCED classifications on a “best fit” basis according to their predominant subject matter. This means that the chosen NZSCED classification reflects the largest part of a course’s subject matter.
A full list of NZSCED classifications is provided in the SDR Manual Appendices. 
For more information on NZSCED classifications, see New Zealand Standard Classification of Education – Education Counts.
Funding category (CATEGORY)
The funding category includes:
an alphabetic code that relates to the delivery classification, and
a numeric code that reflects the level of study.
Alphabetic code
The alphabetic code (based on delivery classification) is used to record YG funded course subjects. It is also used to determine DQ7+ funding but not Youth Guarantee funding. The alphabetic code can be found in Table 2, Appendix 1 of the Delivery at Levels 7 (degree) and above on the New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework (DQ7+) Funding Mechanism.
Numeric code
For YG courses the numeric category will always be 1, as set out in the table below.

Category (numeric code)

Classification by level and content of study

1

Courses designed for non-degree qualifications with no research requirement, including certificates and diplomas

EFTS factor of courses (FACTOR)
The EFTS factor of a course equates to the course size that is a portion of the total EFTS value of the programme leading to award of the qualification of which the course is part. In DXP STEO, the field name is “Qualification” (which means programme leading to award of the qualification).
As a guideline, we recommend that the size of the smallest course should not have an EFTS factor of less than 0.1.
Although you may choose to deliver a smaller course, if the course is based on a single unit standard and has a course EFTS factor of less than 0.1, we do not require you to further disaggregate the course in STEO.
You may report delivery for one qualification as one course. However, that means that a learner can only enrol in the one course (ie, the whole programme) leading to award of the qualification.
After a programme has been disaggregated into courses and we have approved these as eligible for access to YG funding, you cannot retrospectively disaggregate the programme further.
For the purposes of STEO, MoPs and SDR reporting, EFTS factors are calculated using 120 credits per EFTS for all Youth Guarantee provision (the standard number of credits that equate to one full-time year of study).
Calculation
If a qualification is measured in credits, we require the EFTS factor of a course to be calculated by:
dividing the number of credits in the course by the total number of credits in the qualification, and
multiplying that number by the EFTS value of the qualification. 
The EFTS factor must be expressed to four decimal places.
Example: If a qualification has a total of 60 credits and an EFTS value of 0.5, the EFTS factors of the courses in the qualification are calculated as:

Courses

Credits

Qualification EFTS value

Course EFTS factor

1

24

0.5

24/60 x 0.5 = 0.2000

2

20

0.5

20/60 x 0.5 = 0.1667

3

16

0.5

16/60 x 0.5 = 0.1333

 

Credits = 60

 

EFTS value = 0.5

Embedded literacy and numeracy flag (EMB LIT NUM)
You must indicate whether the course includes embedded literacy and/or numeracy provision.
A course with embedded literacy and numeracy provision will deliver deliberate teaching of literacy and numeracy skills and will be part of a programme that has:
explicit literacy and numeracy statements, such as learning outcomes or teaching and learning statements within programme or course information
a literacy and numeracy diagnostic assessment for each learner, and
assessment of each student’s progress in literacy and numeracy skill development.
Closing a qualification
You can remove a qualification that you no longer offer from your MoP and close it from DXP STEO. This removes the qualification from your list of active qualifications and the NZQA Register of Quality Assured Qualifications.
The process can be found on the STEO application.
Tertiary education organisation (TEO) eligibility
To receive Youth Guarantee (YG) Fund funding, you must continue to be:
Te Pūkenga – New Zealand Institute of Skills and Technology (Te Pūkenga); or
a wānanga; or
a private training establishment (PTE); or
a State or State-integrated school that has been funded by us for YG provision since 2011.
 See the YG funding conditions from the relevant year for the full TEO eligibility requirements.
Funding conditions by year
Programme eligibility
See the YG funding conditions from the relevant year for the full programme eligibility requirements.
Funding conditions by year
Minimum requirements
YG Fund provision should: 
lead to the award of a qualification that is either NCEA at Level 1, 2 or 3; or another National or New Zealand Certificate at Level 1, 2 or 3 on the New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework (NZQCF)
include literacy and numeracy provision
comprise part of a recognised pathway (as determined by the New Zealand Qualifications Authority [NZQA]) towards one or more vocational qualifications at Level 4 and above on the NZQCF
be aligned to the Vocational pathways (if it leads to a Level 1 or 2 NCEA qualification)
be provided by tutors who are appropriately qualified.
 From 2023 0.5 EFTS means:
40 credits for a programme leading to a Level 1 or 2 qualification, and
60 credits for all other programmes.
For more information on Vocational Pathways and the list of standards in each pathway see Youth Guarantee.
Youth Guarantee delivery must be face-to-face (for example, not delivered via distance learning or in a work-based setting) unless we authorise you in writing to use an alternative delivery method.
Learner eligibility
See the YG funding conditions from the relevant year for the full learner eligibility requirements.
Funding conditions by year
Learners must not be simultaneously enrolled in school and a Youth Guarantee funded qualification.
Learners must not be enrolled in a Youth Guarantee funded qualification and also be enrolled in another TEC-funded programme at the same time, eg, Intensive Literacy and Numeracy (ILN), Delivery at Levels 1 and 2 on the New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework (DQ1-2), New Zealand Apprenticeship or Gateway.
A learner that is eligible for ILN-funded programmes is not considered to have the necessary literacy and numeracy skills to be successful in a Youth Guarantee programme.
Limit on qualification prior achievement
Qualification prior achievement limits are to ensure that government funding is targeted to learners with no or low qualification prior achievement, and to enable learners to pathway to higher level qualifications.
In practice this means:
a new enrolment is the first time that learner has been enrolled in Youth Guarantee at that TEO, and
the TEO must verify individual learners’ prior achievement before accepting them into the programme.
Level 1 and 2 programmes
TEOs must ensure that learners who already hold a qualification at Level 1 or 2 on the NZQF comprise no more than 10% of new enrolments in a Youth Guarantee programme leading to award of a qualification at that level.

Learner holds a qualification at …

And enrols in a qualification at …

Learner will be included in the 10% prior achievement calculation in each year of delivery

Level 1

Level 1

Yes

Level 2

Level 2

Yes

Level 1

Level 2

No

A learner enrolment in a subsequent Youth Guarantee qualification at the same TEO at any level is not considered a ‘new enrolment’.
Level 3 programmes
To meet the learner eligibility requirements the TEO must:
not enrol a learner in a Youth Guarantee programme if the learner has already achieved a qualification at Level 3 or above on the NZQF, and
prioritise enrolments in Youth Guarantee programmes that lead to award of a level 3 qualification on the NZQF to:

learners who enrolled in Youth Guarantee with low prior achievement (no qualification or a Level 1 qualification), and
learners who have completed a Level 1 or 2 qualification funded through Youth Guarantee.

Age limit for learners
Learners may be re-enrolled in Youth Guarantee, as long as they continue to meet the learner eligibility conditions, including enrolling in no more than 1.5 EFTS provision per calendar year.
Some learners may turn 25 years old during a programme they are enrolled in. These learners remain eligible for Youth Guarantee for the courses required to complete their qualification.
Youth Guarantee funding is not available for learners who have already turned 25 years old to re-enrol in courses they did not successfully complete. Keep this in mind when you enrol a learner who is close to turning 25 years of age, as any re-enrolments in qualifications or courses will need to be self-funded by the learner or from DQ1-2/Delivery at Levels 3–7 (non-degree) on the New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework and all industry training (DQ3-7) Funds funding. 

New EIT | Te Pūkenga art and design tutor encouraging students to create community connections | EIT Hawke’s Bay and Tairāwhiti

Source: Eastern Institute of Technology – Tairāwhiti

29 mins ago

Steph Barnett is enjoying her new role as EIT | Te Pūkenga art and design tutor in Tairāwhiti.

Encouraging students (ākonga) to action their learning outside of the classroom is the focus of new EIT | Te Pūkenga art and design tutor, Steph Barnett.

Steph, who describes herself as a “creative from day dot”, has recently joined the IDEAschool team in Tairāwhiti to teach the New Zealand Certificate in Arts and Design (Level 3 and 4) programmes.

She brings with her a personal creative practice as well as experience as an educator, including in trauma-informed education. She is now focused on giving her akonga every opportunity to develop their skills and creativity.

“I’ve always loved art. My earliest happy memories are of creating. I’ve been varied in my creative and professional practice. I would definitely say that I like new challenges, and I really like cross-disciplinary practices.”

“One of the reasons why this role specifically appealed to me was that it is wide ranging. It’s printmaking, fashion design, graphic design, photography, and fine art. Those are all things that I get excited about, and it’s a bit of a taster for emerging creatives, to find out what is working for them, before they decide to go down one path.”

She says it is important for tutors to link what they are teaching in the classroom to the wider creative world.

“We need to be creating community connections and enabling our ākonga to see themselves outside of the classroom.”

Steph has a diverse background with her work in trauma-informed education and learning te reo Māori in a full-immersion course at Te Wānanga o Raukawa.

“Trauma-informed education is another passion of mine. It is around positive social change, community change, and definitely a huge part of my teaching ethos is recognising everyone’s potential to grow and to develop. The learning pathway looks different for different people.”

“The full immersion year was super impactful for me. It really shifted my perspective. I gained a much deeper appreciation for te ao Māori, and how powerful an indigenous perspective is. I think that a Māori lens on our global issues right now holds potential for healing and regenerative practice for our whole world. Especially in relation to climate change, wealth inequality and our relationship with technology and AI” 

As for her personal artistic practice, Steph is currently working towards having her own exhibition.

“It is centred around the female experience, and in particular looks at female cycles, like our menstruation, and then how that relates to our environmental and social context.”

“I celebrate growth in my work, this comes through in native plants and flowers of Aotearoa present in most of my work.”

Steph says she is loving her new position and credits her colleagues for supporting her and ākonga for being passionate about creativity.

“They are just so wonderful. They’re so supportive of each other, and they’re very impressive artists already. I feel like I’m learning so much from them.”

“They are comfortable with experimenting, pushing different ideas, dreaming big, and really aiming for a high standard in their work. They are also really open to trying new opportunities and saying yes.”

The Acting Head of IDEAschool, Sue Blackmore, said: “IDEAschool welcomes Steph to the team. She is a fantastic asset to EIT | Te Pūkenga, bringing with her a wealth of experience and strong relationships within the Tairāwhiti creative community.”

EIT | Te Pūkenga graduate named as Young Winemaker of the Year | EIT Hawke’s Bay and Tairāwhiti

Source: Eastern Institute of Technology – Tairāwhiti

15 mins ago

Alena Kamper, a graduate of the Viticulture & Wine Science Concurrent Degree at EIT | Te Pūkenga, is the 2023 Tonnellerie de Mercurey North Island Young Winemaker of the Year.

Alena Kamper, a graduate of the Viticulture & Wine Science Concurrent Degree at EIT | Te Pūkenga, is the 2023 Tonnellerie de Mercurey North Island Young Winemaker of the Year, following the competition held at Indevin’s Gimblett Gravels winery.

Not only did Alena, 22, who now works at Sacred Hill Winery, win the competition, but Casey Mackintosh, a current Bachelor of Viticulture & Wine Science  student came second.

Alena said she had been nervous to enter the competition, which made the win unexpected.

“I had heard great things about the competition and that it was a great way to make connections in the industry and to really challenge yourself.”

“At first I didn’t feel ready because I was quite new into the industry. It’s going to be my first year of full-time work. And then what got me over the line to apply was people were saying, it’s really a great place to learn and see what you don’t know.”

“They were talking about how they regretted not entering and so that made it seem less intimidating, which is what pushed me to apply.”

To win the competition, Alena had to prove her skills in a range of tasks from blending, wine market knowledge, cellar skills, wine tasting and an interview.

The awards dinner was held at Brookfields Winery where the contestants delivered their Fruitfed speeches, which focused on hot topics for the wine industry. Alena says her speech was on Hawke’s Bay neeing a new varietal to entice new age wine drinkers.

“it was a super cool topic. I really enjoyed writing that. I had a lot of fun with the speech. I was quite happy with the topic I got.”

For her efforts Alena won $1,000 cash, premium wines, a Dale Carnegie leadership course and an educational trip sponsored by Fruitfed Supplies. This trip will take place early next year.

Alena now goes on to represent the North Island in the National Final of the 2023 Tonnellerie de Mercurey NZ Young Winemaker of the Year on 31 October at The Bone Line in Waipara, North Canterbury.

She says she is looking forward to the national competition, but realises it will be a step up.

Alena looks back at her time at EIT | Te Pūkenga with fondness, saying the programme was recommended to her by an old science teacher of hers at the school she attended, Sacred Heart College.

“I always loved science and did really well in that area at school. When I was about to leave high school, I was unsure of what I wanted to do. I wanted it to be science-based, but I didn’t want that to be the core of the degree. So when the teacher recommended the course, I signed up for it.”

“I was lacking knowledge in  wine and experience in wine but I loved it and I never looked back. I was really happy I made that decision.”

She says she loved the degree and was pleased that the lecturers gave one-on-one help to students.

“Some of our lecturers were from the industry, so they were teaching us real-life wine industry related content..”

“I think it was a really good, well-rounded degree and I think it was really easy to ask for help and receive help, which made it feel a little bit less intimidating when we’re going into study.”

Alena finished her degree last year, but only graduated this year because of Cyclone Gabrielle delays.

She wasted no time in getting employment in the industry. She did two vintages at Villa Maria and then got an opportunity to do one at Sacred Hill, where she was offered a permanent role as a cellar hand.

Sue Blackmore, the Head of the School of Viticulture and Wine Science at EIT | Te Pūkenga, said: “The Viticulture and Wine Science School congratulate Elena on both her success in the Young Winemaker but also forging ahead with her career in the Wine world. We aim to assist our graduates to find their feet quickly and find exciting career paths in an exciting NZ industry.”

Equity funding

Source: Tertiary Education Commission

Last updated 9 October 2023
Last updated 9 October 2023

Print

Share

This page contains information for tertiary education organisations about using Equity funding. For 2023, Equity funding is available for Māori, Pacific, and disabled learners.
This page contains information for tertiary education organisations about using Equity funding. For 2023, Equity funding is available for Māori, Pacific, and disabled learners.

Making education easier to access and improving the achievement of all learners is a core part of the priorities outlined in the Tertiary Education Strategy. 
Tertiary education organisations (TEOs) contribute to this by accommodating the diverse needs and aspirations of learners of all ethnicities, genders, ages, abilities and socio-economic backgrounds.
Equity funding is a “top-up” to:
Delivery at Levels 1 and 2 on the New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework (DQ1-2) Fund (available only for disabled learners), and
Delivery at Levels 7 (degree) and above on the New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework (DQ7+) Fund (available for Māori, Pacific, and disabled learners).
For learners with disabilities, Equity funding seeks to improve their participation in tertiary education and achievement of qualifications. For Māori and Pacific learners, it is to improve participation in and achievement at higher levels of tertiary education (Level 7 (degree) and above).
Equity funding helps cover the costs of any additional support some learners may need and is not intended to be the sole or primary source of funding. Equity funding should supplement DQ1-2 and DQ7+ funding and contribute to ensuring the success of all learners.
Equity funding does not apply to the Non-degree Delivery at Levels 3–7 on the New Zealand Qualifications and Credentials Framework and all industry training (DQ3-7) Fund which includes TEOs to put learners at the centre of their organisation and to improve outcomes for learners.
Resources
We expect all providers to offer the support required for learner success. These resources contain helpful information:

Love of gardens lures mature student back into study at EIT | Te Pūkenga | EIT Hawke’s Bay and Tairāwhiti

Source: Eastern Institute of Technology – Tairāwhiti

Sophie Worsnop is now in a career she enjoys after graduating from EIT | Te Pūkenga.

A love of gardens and a desire to work outdoors led a mature student to overcome her nerves and study at EIT | Te Pūkenga.

Having left school in 2012, Sophie Worsnop worked in hospitality for ten years before COVID-19 lockdowns made her realise she wanted to work outdoors. She returned home from Australia and was attracted to the New Zealand Certificate in Horticulture (Level 3) at EIT | Te Pūkenga. She followed that up with the NZ Certificate in Sustainable Primary Production (Level 4).

“I had wanted to go to university post high school. I graduated 2012, but I had a really bad injury and couldn’t go to school, so I couldn’t go to university. So I went and did hospitality and I got that hospitality bug and did it for 10 years.”

“I lived in Wellington and then got stuck in Melbourne through COVID-19 and decided that I hated being stuck inside. I found my biggest peace through all the lockdowns in Melbourne going to the botanical gardens. So I came home in July 2021 and didn’t really know what to do with my life. I knew that I didn’t want to stay in hospitality anymore just because of how COVID-19 had treated things.”

She says she happened to notice the horticulture programme at EIT | Te Pūkenga.

“I saw it and thought, ‘Oh, that’s something that I really love’. I was keen to work in gardens and work with people. I was a bit nervous about being an adult student but I thought I’d give it a go.

Having grown up on a farm, Sophie always had an interest in landscaping and gardening. This passion was cultivated in Melbourne where she had about 300 house plants during the lockdowns.

“I think really recognising the anxiety and frustration that being cooped up inside was giving me, made me really want to appreciate my outdoors. I was raised on a farm out in Tukituki so everyone’s always told me that I’m an earth baby. I’ve always enjoyed being out and tutu-ing around in the garden.”

“It’s always been there, but I don’t think I really ever thought about it as a career or furthering my education until after COVID-19.”

Sophie says she loved studying at EIT | Te Pūkenga and enjoyed learning from the tutors, whose passion, she says, was “second to none”.

“It was inspiring to help me let go of a lot of stress and anxiety and I guess the hustle of the world.”

“I think that industry works at the same rate as things grow. So in winter we get to slow down a little bit more because everything slows down and stops growing. And in summer we work a bit harder and faster because everything grows a bit harder and faster.”

She also says she found that she was well supported as a mature student.

Since finishing studying, Sophie has been working at garden and ground care specialists, Bark Limited. She is a team leader working in a number of retirement centres around Hawke’s Bay.

“Our shirts say Great Gardens, Great Service. And to me that’s the joy of bringing people and their gardens together, creating that network for them”.

Programme Coordinator Lisa Turnbull says: “It’s great to see a person with a passion for horticulture get a formal education and end up with a great job in the industry”.

Gerard Henry, programme tutor says: “The introductory Level 3 Horticulture programme offers so much more than growing and gardening skills but also an opportunity to rekindle or discover new practices and passion for the plant kingdom and the environment. Sophie is a fine example of a learner that was unsure where the programme might take her at the outset but eventually became focused toward the end of the course to seek new work opportunities.”

IDEAschool graduate named as finalist in national design competition | EIT Hawke’s Bay and Tairāwhiti

Source: Eastern Institute of Technology – Tairāwhiti

4 days ago

EIT | Te Pūkenga graduate Yenny Lopdell has been named as a finalist in the Best Design Awards.

A recent IDEAschool graduate at EIT | Te Pūkenga has been named as a finalist in New Zealand’s premier design competition.

Yenny Lopdell and her sustainable spatial screen ‘Sketsel’ is a finalist in the Student Product Category at The Best Design Awards by the Designers Institute of New Zealand.

The Best Design Awards is an annual showcase of excellence in Graphic, Spatial, Product, Digital and Moving Image along with three special awards – Value of Design, Public Good and Toitanga.

“It means a lot to me to be recognised as a finalist. At the beginning of the project, I would have never thought I would be entering, let alone become a finalist in any awards.”

‘Sketsel’ was Yenny’s final third year project.

Originally from Indonesia, Yenny incorporated the Javanese Batik pattern of ‘Parang’ into her work. The end result is a spatial screen using paper waste, which is formed together by the arrangement of intertwining diagonal S shapes.

“The screen is precisely cut with laser technology and assembled by hand. Lighting is also deeply considered so that when backlit, the complex spatial interplay diffuses light creating a range of exciting and dynamic tones on the screen surfaces.”

The 42-year-old graduated with a Bachelor of Creative Practice (Design) earlier this year and is now working as a Graphic Designer at Napier-based design agency Band.

She first started the level 4 certificate in 2017 before embarking on the degree.

“I had been searching for what I wanted to do, and I came to the right place. EIT has helped me find my passion and understand how I can use where I’m from and extract that and incorporate it into my work. They have helped bring me out from no one to someone.”

Yenny says EIT | IDEAschool design lecturer James Smith encouraged her to make a submission.

“James was really helpful and guided me through the submission process.”

She is now planning to gift her screens to EIT | Te Pūkenga and is exploring what the possibilities are for Sketsel.

“I’m hoping this screen will inspire other students. The last project is important for the future and can open so many doors.”

EIT | Te Pūkenga Design Lecturer James Smith said: “Everyone at IDEAschool is immensely proud of Yenny and her remarkable accomplishments with her graduate project, ‘Sketsel’.”

“We witnessed her unwavering enthusiasm, effort, and dedication in creating these elegantly crafted, sustainable spatial object designs. Yenny’s well deserved recognition as a finalist in the Best Awards and as a top emerging designer in Aotearoa is a testament to her outstanding talent and commitment.”

 The Awards will be held on October 6.

New Culinary Arts Degree to Invigorate Food Industry

Source: Toi Ohomai Institute of Technology

The Bay of Plenty is embarking on a culinary revolution by introducing a one-of-a-kind culinary arts degree to invigorate and fortify the region’s thriving food industry.

Toi Ohomai | Te Pūkenga is launching the Bay of Plenty delivery of the Bachelor of Culinary Arts, with the aim that this course helps to reinvigorate and bolster the booming food industry in the rohe.  

The degree course is already offered at Otago Polytechnic | Te Pūkenga, and Dunedin was the only location in Aotearoa to offer the qualification previously. Under Te Pūkenga, Toi Ohomai is now able to offer the course to ākonga in the Bay of Plenty and the wider North Island.  

Toi Ohomai culinary arts tutor and industry stalwart Peter Blakeway is excited to be able to offer the course in the Bay of Plenty and says demand is high for a degree-level culinary course. 

He says this modern course will be the future of culinary arts as it is not just about becoming a chef. 

“The outcomes are going to be different to a trade qualification, it’s about the wider food industry. This programme is designed to help people become an industry leader in the food world by empowering them to follow their passions.”

Ākonga will cultivate applied technical and creative thinking skills, including specialised culinary techniques within their area of interest, and ways to develop new and innovative offerings to give themself a competitive edge. 

Through hands-on projects with local employers and businesses, ākonga will develop real-world skills and apply both creative and technical knowledge in everyday situations. 

Career pathways upon completing the degree include food producer, chef, recipe developer, food stylist, writer or product entrepreneur.

Peter says the food industry in the Bay of Plenty is in full support of the degree course being offered at Toi Ohomai. 

Tauranga Business Chamber Chief Executive Matt Cowley says the Western Bay of Plenty subregion was facing dramatic changes over the next few decades and that there was an immediate priority to support and enhance the region’s changing hospitality sector to complement New Zealand’s tourism reset and reconnection with the global economy following the pandemic. 

“It is a priority to upskill our hospitality and food industries to forge lifelong learning and career pathways to ensure the sector maintains its knowledge and skill bases.

“The Tauranga Business Chamber supports this initiative as it’s aligned with the region’s natural assets, regional strengths, economic strategies, and private sector industry investment.”

Solera Wine Bar Director Nick Potts says he was excited to hear about this initiative. 

“I agree our industry is hurting and we as professionals in the industry need to lead the way in this change.”

Peter says there is already considerable interest from ākonga, with many looking at it as a pathway to open their own business. 

“We’re also seeing a lot of interest from women, which is great as historically culinary arts has been somewhat male dominated.” 

The Bachelor of Culinary Arts kicks off in February 2024 at both the Toi Ohomai Rotorua and Tauranga campuses.
 

PBRF Quality Evaluation 2026 – Consultation open on Panel-Specific Guidelines

Source: Tertiary Education Commission

Last updated 29 September 2023
Last updated 29 September 2023

Print

Share

Consultation is now open on the draft Panel-Specific Guidelines for the Performance-Based Research Fund (PBRF) Quality Evaluation 2026.
Consultation is now open on the draft Panel-Specific Guidelines for the Performance-Based Research Fund (PBRF) Quality Evaluation 2026.

The Panel-Specific Guidelines have been developed by peer-review panels to support staff members submitting their Evidence Portfolios (EPs) for assessment in Quality Evaluation 2026.
Along with the Guidelines for TEOs participating in Quality Evaluation 2026 (TEO Guidelines) and the Guidelines for the Quality Evaluation 2026 assessment process (Assessment Guidelines), the Panel-Specific Guidelines provide panel- and subject-specific guidance for participating tertiary education organisation (TEO) staff members. They incorporate the in-principle decisions on EP design made by the Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) on the basis of the Sector Reference Group’s consultation process and recommendations since September 2021.
The TEC is consulting on the draft Panel-Specific Guidelines to ensure the guidance serves TEO staff submitting EPs for assessment.
Read the Draft Panel-Specific Guidelines (PDF 1.2 MB)
Consultation, feedback and next steps
Consultation on the draft Panel-Specific Guidelines is open from 29 September to 10 November 2023.
You can submit feedback via this online survey: Panel-Specific Guidelines.
The peer-review panels and TEC will carefully consider all feedback. The final guidelines will be published in December 2023.

Youth Guarantee Fund

Source: Tertiary Education Commission

Last updated 16 June 2023
Last updated 16 June 2023

Print

Share

Youth Guarantee (YG) funding provides fees-free tertiary study at Levels 1–3 to enable young people to progress to higher-level education or employment.
Youth Guarantee (YG) funding provides fees-free tertiary study at Levels 1–3 to enable young people to progress to higher-level education or employment.

The Youth Guarantee Fund is part of a wider suite of initiatives that includes Vocational Pathways and Secondary-Tertiary Programmes (such as Trades Academies). These initiatives provide opportunities for learners to achieve a minimum of the National Certificate of Educational Achievement (NCEA) Level 2 or equivalent, to enable progression to higher levels of study, training or employment.
More information on the wider programmes is available at Youth Guarantee.

From 1 January 2023 the following changes will be applied to the Youth Guarantee fund:
lowering the credit value from 100 to 80 credits per equivalent full-time student (EFTS) at Levels 1 and 2 to better reflect learning profiles and ensure better alignment with expectations in schools (there is no change to the EFTS credit value for Level 3 learners)
increased learner YG lifetime entitlement to 2.5 EFTS
extending the YG upper age limit to include learners up to 24 years of age (at the time they commence the YG programme)
enabling part-time enrolment to support flexible arrangements and learner needs
increasing the transport assistance subsidy from $860 to $1,000 per EFTS to better enable providers to support their learners’ transport needs
increasing the pastoral care subsidy from $537 to $2,000 per EFTS to ensure adequacy of funding
renaming the pastoral care subsidy as “wellbeing and pathways support subsidy” to signal a broader purpose of this funding
making the wellbeing and pathways support subsidy non-recoverable to ensure funding security for
a condition of the wellbeing and pathways support subsidy is that tertiary education organisations (TEOs) are expected to work with learners and their whānau to develop a pathway plan to map “where to from here”. The plan would support each learner’s needs to move to further study and/or employment. The level of detail would depend on:
each learner’s individual needs
their end goals
support they need throughout their study to meet those goals
any support the learner requires post-study to take the next steps towards further study and/or employment.

Youth Guarantee interaction with Fees Free
Courses funded under Youth Guarantee that started on or after 1 July 2020 do not use a learner’s entitlement to Fees Free, and do not impact a learner’s future eligibility for Fees Free.
For information on the interaction of Fees Free and Youth Guarantee before 1 July 2020, see Interactons with other Funds – MPTT and YG interaction with Fees Free. 

Māori and Pasifika Trades Training

Source: Tertiary Education Commission

MPTT interaction with Fees Free
If a learner enrols in MPTT on or after 1 July 2020, their MPTT training will no longer count towards the use of a learner’s fees-free entitlement, or count as prior study. This means learners will not be disadvantaged by being enrolled in MPTT initiatives.
If a learner has completed an MPTT course, and goes on to further study, are they eligible for Fees Free?
This will depend on when the learner started and completed their MPTT course.

MPTT course start/end date

Outcome

Starts on, or after, 1 January 2018, and ends prior to 30 June 2020
This study will count towards the use of a learner’s fees-free entitlement.
Starts on, or after, 1 January 2020 and continues after July 2020
See table below.
Starts on, or after, 1 July 2020
The study will not count towards the use of a learner’s fees-free entitlement.
This table shows the proportion of a course that does count towards a learner’s fees-free entitlement use.

Course start date 

Percentage of course post 1 July 

Proportion of course that counts towards entitlement use

 1 January – 30 April 2020
 Less than 50%
 100%
 1 January – 30 April 2020
 50% to less than 75%
 50%
 1 January – 30 April 2020
 75% or more
 0%
 1 May – 30 June 2020
 33% or more
 0%
 1 May – 30 June 2020
 Less than 33%
 100%
MPTT courses that started on or after 1 July 2020 will not be counted towards a learner’s fees-free entitlement.
Therefore, if a learner enrols in an MPTT course that started on or after 1 July 2020, this study will not impact their eligibility for Fees Free tertiary education, under current policy settings. If the learner has previously accessed Fees Free, and has remaining entitlement, they will be able to use this at a later date (should they meet the criteria applicable at the time of enrolment in further study).
Prior study rules for MPTT from 1 July 2020
Will MPTT study be included in a learner’s prior study when determining eligibility for Fees Free?
To be eligible for Fees Free, a learner must not have undertaken more than half a year of equivalent full-time tertiary education (0.5 equivalent full-time student (EFTS) or 60 credits) at level 3 or above on the New Zealand Qualifications Framework (NZQF), including tertiary education at an equivalent level undertaken in any country; known as the prior study criteria.  
Credits obtained from MPTT courses that start on, or after 1 July 2020 will no longer be included as part of the 60 credits of prior study criteria. 
Refer to the above table for interactions between YG and Fees Free.
Any MPTT study that started before 1 July 2020 will continue to be included in prior study calculations for fees-free eligibility.
Learners will not need to apply to the TEC for the changes to be reflected in their fees-free entitlements. However, it will take time for the TEC to process the changes for them to be reflected in an individual’s fees-free entitlement information.
MPTT interaction with TTAF
This section provides guidance on how to enrol and report on learners at Level 3 and above in the MPTT fund with the introduction of Targeted Training and Apprenticeship Fund (TTAF) on 1 July 2020:
What does the introduction of TTAF, and the change to Fees Free, mean for MPTT?
We expect a learner that would have been enrolled as a MPTT learner in the past, will continue to be enrolled through MPTT whilst there are places available, rather than TTAF. This is because the MPTT Fund offers additional resources and pastoral care to learners that require it.
MPTT places should continue to be used as agreed with your consortia and TEC.
TTAF study does not use up fees-free entitlements, and will not count as prior study in relation to any future fees-free entitlement.
Changes to the Fees Free rules mean that MPTT enrolments after 1 July 2020 will no longer a learner’s fees-free entitlement, or count as prior study. This means learners will not be disadvantaged by being enrolled in MPTT with respect to their fees-free eligibility.
The TEC will include reviewing enrolment source of funding (SOF) codes in its monitoring activity.
If we enrol a learner in TTAF instead of MPTT, what is the TEC’s position on this?
If you choose to:
enrol a learner under SAC Level 3 and above, in a TTAF eligible programme; and
prior to TTAF being available you would have ordinarily enrolled that learner under MPTT (SOF 28,29);you are required to support this learner in the same way that you would have supported them via MPTT.
you will be required to self-fund the same level of support that would have been provided had those learners been enrolled in MPTT. No additional funding will be provided for the support. The requirement can be found in your funding agreement at clause 40(c).
The Ministry of Education are considering the impact of TTAF on MPTT settings for learners and Tertiary Education Organisations. Any changes will be communicated following the Minister’s agreement to any changes to the MPTT funding parameters.