Category: ACT Party

Source: ACT Party

“The National Public Health Service’s decision to invest time and resources into opposing the resource consent for a McDonald’s in Wanaka shows exactly why cost-cutting measures are justified,” says ACT Health spokesman Todd Stephenson, who is based in Queenstown.

“This is the same agency that waged war on food trucks in Invercargill, trying to shut down operators who didn’t serve healthy options.

“These taxpayer-funded busybodies have either misread or are wilfully undermining the direction of the Coalition Government on wasteful spending and resource management.

“They are exploiting the resource management process to impose their own nanny state agenda. As one commenter pointed out, half their submission against the proposed McDonald’s is based on health concerns irrelevant to resource management, the other half concerns matters on which the Public Health Service has no expertise, from climate change and litter to aesthetics and ‘cultural wellbeing’.

“The Public Health Service is meant to be responsible for managing infectious diseases, but during a global pandemic they were so useless they had to be sidelined, with the Ministry of Health leading the COVID response.

“ACT welcomes reports of impending cost-cutting measures at the Public Health Service. Ideally the Government would go further and strip the Service right back to its core function of responding to infectious diseases, like the current whooping cough outbreak.

“We’re also cheering on the Minister for RMA Reform, aided by Simon Court, as he develops a resource management system that puts property rights first and sidelines the busybodies.”

Source: ACT Party

Auckland-based ACT MP Dr Parmjeet Parmar met with Auckland Transport yesterday to relay concerns about crime, public safety, and fare dodging on Auckland’s bus network.

“I’ve heard directly from bus drivers, operators, and passengers who are frustrated by Auckland Transport’s slow response to safety issues on public transport,” says Dr Parmar.

“Yesterday’s meeting was an important opportunity to bring these concerns directly to Auckland Transport’s attention – particularly on behalf of those operators who feel like they are being ignored by the agency.

“I stressed the urgency of rolling out safety measures for bus drivers, who should not have to fear for their physical safety while doing their jobs.

“I was pleased that Auckland Transport has committed to providing data on the number of warnings and fines issued for fare evasion. However, I was not left with the impression that Auckland Transport sees fare dodging as a serious issue, despite the agency being warned repeatedly that fare dodging leads to violence.

“Weak enforcement of existing rules has fostered a culture of entitlement, where some passengers refuse to meet their obligation to pay.

“In our meeting, Auckland Transport identified racism as a driver of the abuse, with many bus drivers being from ethnic communities. This makes the issue of violence on buses even more alarming. If someone thinks that their race, or the race of the bus driver, entitles them to ride for free, that requires a strong response from Auckland Transport and Police.

“Data from 2021 showed that only 13 per cent of those caught fare dodging were issued a ticket across all modes of public transport, with estimations of up to two million in fares being dodged in two years. A stronger message needs to be sent that fare dodging is unacceptable.

“It is vital that any public transport system has the trust and buy-in from its users. If people do not feel safe to work on or use public transport, they won’t do it.

“Auckland Transport says limited resourcing makes it difficult to deploy transport officers at the scale bus drivers would like. ACT says there has to be a solution here. I will continue to listen to the concerns of all affected parties and push for Auckland Transport to act more decisively.”

Source: ACT Party

Celebrating one year of ACT in Government this week, ACT Leader David Seymour says:

“Last year, ACT campaigned to rein in the cost of living, deliver real consequences for crime, and end divisive policies. Kiwis who voted ACT didn’t just vote for a change of government, they voted for a change of direction.

“After just one year in Government, we can report that Kiwis who trusted ACT with their vote have had an outsized impact in changing the direction of our country. We’ve put values of freedom, personal responsibility, and equal rights into action.

“We’ve seen price inflation brought under control and mortgage rates cut. We’ve seen more police on the streets and fewer ram raids. And New Zealanders can now have their say in an overdue debate on whether equal rights are protected by the Treaty of Waitangi.

“Every day we’re working to empower New Zealanders to peacefully make a difference in their own lives and the lives of those they care about, no matter their background.”

Below is a non-exhaustive list of 70 actions ACT has taken in the first year of Government:

THE ECONOMY:

• Cut wasteful Government spending to get inflation under control.
• Delivered tax cuts to ease the cost of living.
• Restored the Reserve Bank’s focus on tackling inflation.
• Restored the option of 90-day trials for all businesses.
• Established the Ministry for Regulation to cut red tape to make doing business simpler.
• Opened a Red Tape Tipline.
• Commenced two regulatory reviews for early childhood education and agricultural products.
• Repealed the Auckland Fuel Tax.
• Repealed the Ute Tax.
• Repealed “Fair Pay” Agreements
• Repealed Labour’s resource management regime.
• Agreed on core features for a replacement of the Resource Management Act centred on property rights.
• Sped up timeframes for overseas investment applications.
• Reduced hikes to the Fire and Emergency levy.
• Increased the use of sanctions for beneficiaries who can work but refuse to take steps to find a job.
• Eased restrictions to accessing credit under the Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act.
• Scrapped EECA’s “decarbonising industry” (GIDI) fund.
• Scrapped Auckland Light Rail, the Lake Onslow hydro scheme, and funding for Let’s Get Wellington Moving.
• Started phasing back in interest deductibility.
• Suspended the requirement for new Significant Natural Areas.
• Unveiled a new contracting gateway test to provide certainty to workers and businesses.
• Began delivering regulatory relief for businesses dealing with anti-money laundering rules.
• Delivered regulatory relief for earthquake-prone buildings.
• Kept agriculture out of the Emissions Trading Scheme.
• Launched consultation to improve the Holidays Act.
• Launched a nationwide roadshow to inform improvements to health and safety law.
• Launched a framework for Regional Deals between central and local government to deliver infrastructure.
• Launched a refreshed framework for Public Private Partnerships.
• Stopped blanket speed limit reductions and enabled faster speed limits on our safest roads.
• Introduced legislation to reverse the oil and gas ban and promote the use of Crown minerals.
• Introduced tenancy legislation to enable Pet Bonds, restore 90-day ‘no cause’ terminations, and restore tenants’ and landlords’ notice periods to 21 and 42 days.
• Introduced legislation to improve access to building products available overseas.
• Introduced a member’s bill to liberalise Easter Trading.

LAW AND ORDER:

• Increased funding for Corrections to lift prison capacity.
• Abolished Labour’s prisoner reduction target.
• Defunded Section 27 “cultural reports”.
• Commenced a review of the Firearms Registry.
• Strengthened consequences for Kāinga Ora tenants who engage in repeated antisocial behaviour.
• Strengthened Firearms Prohibition Orders.
• Made gang membership an aggravating factor at sentencing.
• Enabled greater use of remote participation by victims in court proceedings.
• Piloted military-style academies for young offenders.
• Introduced legislation to reinstate Three Strikes.
• Introduced a member’s bill to make rehabilitation or education a condition of parole.
• Introduced legislation to toughen sentences for attacks on workers and give weight to the victim’s circumstances at sentencing.
• Introduced legislation to unlock tougher measures for young serious offenders.
• Introduced legislation to amend Part 6 of the Arms Act affecting clubs and ranges.
• Successfully campaigned to overturned race-based prosecution guidelines.

DEMOCRACY:

• Directed the public service to deliver services based on need, not race, and end “progressive procurement” quotas.
• Abolished the Māori Health Authority.
• Advanced the Treaty Principles Bill to select committee.
• Restored local referendums on Māori Wards.
• Scrapped Labour’s law to give 16-year-olds votes in local elections.
• Broadened the scope of the Covid inquiry with a second phase.
• Defunded the Christchurch Call.
• Halted work on hate speech laws.
• Introduced legislation to remove Section 7AA of the Oranga Tamariki Act.
• Seen Otago University adopt a free speech policy in response to ACT’s coalition agreement.
• Allowed charity-run lotteries to operate online permanently.
• Achieved a select committee recommendation to end taxpayer-funded election broadcasts.

EDUCATION:

• Restored charter schools, now with the option of state school conversion, with the first schools to open next year.
• Streamlined early childhood education regulations.
• Delivered an action plan to improve school attendance and started publishing attendance data weekly.
• Improved the school lunch programme to feed more kids for less money.
• Switched fees-free university from first year to third.

HEALTH:

• Delivered Pharmac its largest-ever budget, which has now funded life-saving medicines.
• Restored the sale of medicine containing pseudoephedrine.
• Streamlined medicine approval and funding processes.
• Introduced legislation to repeal the Therapeutic Products Act.
• Successfully campaigned to end discriminatory access to GP services in Hawke’s Bay.

Source: ACT Party

Tauranga-based ACT MP Cameron Luxton can reveal that Tauranga City Council has spent more than $180,000 on a documentary about Te Manawataki o Te Papa, a civic precinct development in Tauranga.

This information was obtained by ACT through a LGOIMA request.

“Instead of investing in core infrastructure or easing the burden on ratepayers, the council has wasted money on a self-congratulating documentary that most people will never watch,” says Mr Luxton.

“Despite hosting VIPs for the documentary’s launch party, the council still hasn’t made the film public. That means ratepayers will have to wait before finding out whether the documentary highlights the civic centre’s $300 million price tag, or its $6.5 million ongoing annual operational costs.

“This is exactly the kind of spending the Government has urged councils to rein in. If the development requires an expensive documentary in order to get the local community on board, perhaps it’s not the best use of ratepayer money.

“Many Tauranga families and businesses are struggling with eye-watering rates bills, fuelled by unnecessary spending locked in by the unelected commissioners like Te Manawataki o Te Papa. If the Council really wants to ‘breathe new life’ into the city, it should focus on slashing waste to reduce rates so that households have money to spend and businesses have the confidence to open, invest and expand.”

Source: ACT Party

Responding to news that 80 percent of buses in Auckland will have protection screens by 2026, ACT MP Dr Parmjeet Parmar says:

“This is good news, but the rollout of protection screens is slow and doesn’t solve the fundamental problem — a culture of entitlement that sees violent people boarding the bus for a free ride.”

In a letter to Dr Parmar this month, Auckland Transport revealed that only 35 buses have protection screens presently.

“Auckland Transport’s removal of cash from buses during COVID gave some people the impression they could ride the bus without paying, and a bus contractor has recently told me they believe this is leading to confrontations with drivers and dangerous individuals boarding the bus and terrorising passengers,” says Dr Parmar.

“Auckland Transport needs to take responsibility for the culture of entitlement it has created. A stronger message needs to be sent that fare-dodging is unacceptable, and public transport officers need the resourcing, training, and powers to crack down on offenders.

“Protection shields are one important step, but passengers deserve to be safe too. I’ll soon be meeting with AT and bus contractors, because there have to be some better, faster solutions here.”

Source: ACT Party

The Haps

ACT’s Dr Parmjeet Parmar made an excellent point about the spate of attacks on bus drivers. It doesn’t help when bus operators like Auckland Transport don’t enforce fares. Instead of someone else’s property that you should respect, the message is ‘you’re entitled, this bus is yours, do what you like.’ Her point was covered widely over the weekend in articles such as this. It’s a very good example of ACT taking a values-based approach to New Zealand’s problems.

Wrong kind of viral

Te Pāti Māori MPs have, in the words of one widely viewed American commentator, made New Zealand a laughing stock. The problem is not the haka, it’s the fact that Te Pāti Māori, and others who should know better, believe reasoned debate and war dances are equal ways to do politics.

Of course we’d rather not be writing about Te Pāti Māori’s antics, so we won’t. Some of the commentary around the antics, though, is so unhinged it requires a response.

At the heart of the problem is the post-modern disease that Free Press rails against. Doing war dances, getting in people’s faces, well that’s just a form of self expression no different from reasoned debate. Worse, it’s Māori expressing themselves, is about what some commentators have said in the last few days.

Free Press is a liberal publication, we believe in universal human rights, free speech, and free markets. So perhaps we’re biased, but we believe there are certain things that are true no matter who you are.

We believe that there are universal truths, some ways of living are just better than others. They lead to longer life expectancies, less violence, better health.

No culture owns these better ways of living, and no culture is immune to barbarism either. It’s only 400 years ago that witches were burned at the stake in England. You can still go to the waterfront in Lisbon and see where the inquisition tortured people, or Paris where the French beheaded each other in fits of madness. Only a few hundred years ago, everywhere was barbarous.

You can study what kinds of rules help people overcome suffering to do better. Europe, North America, Asia, and India, and now green shoots in Africa, show the way.

A system of personal freedom under the law is what works. Governments should be subject to regular free and fair elections by secret ballot. Citizens and their representatives should enjoy freedom of speech. As people in each place have adopted these values, they’ve doubled their life expectancy, from 40 not that long ago, to 80 now.

We acknowledge many Māori have specific problems to overcome. Actually, most people do. But the fact individuals have problems doesn’t change the best framework for overcoming them.

The idea that Māori are completely different people, and that the system that’s doubled life expectancy around the world doesn’t work for us, is absurd. For one thing there’s just no reason to think that Māori would be the only people on the planet for whom liberal democracy doesn’t work.

For another, most Māori, like the seven in the current Cabinet, actually do believe in liberal democracy. We shouldn’t need to say it but the idea that all Māori think the same is not only incorrect but also, well, racist.

That all brings us back to the Haka. Te Pāti Māori don’t represent a Māori way of doing things. They represent a minority within Māoridom who believe they are truly different from everyone else on the planet without any evidence.

These are the basic facts that should form New Zealand’s public narrative, and our job is to keep articulating them until they do.

Source: ACT Party

Responding to the news of a stabbing at Westfield Newmarket, MP for Epsom David Seymour says:

“This behaviour is unacceptable. My thoughts go out to the victim of this senseless act and his family.

“Newmarket’s security guards are local heroes. They calmly and professionally put themselves in danger every day to protect Newmarket’s businesses and visitors. I urge people to support the police by responding to their call for information.”

Police ask that any witnesses who can assist with enquiries to update them online or contact 105. Please use the reference number P060688447.

Source: ACT Party

ACT’s Building and Construction spokesperson Cameron Luxton is welcoming the passage of legislation to extend to remediation timeframes for earthquake-prone buildings, but says the 2016 legislation needs to be revisited in its entirety and scrapped.

“The looming remediation deadlines have created enormous uncertainty and costs,” says Mr Luxton, who is also Parliament’s only licenced builder.

“ACT was the only party to vote against the earthquake regulations back in 2016. The rules were developed in response to the tragic loss of life in the Christchurch earthquakes, but in policymaking real respect for life means making the rules work for the people who have to live with them.

“Good law making should be risk-proportionate, but an arbitrary, inconsistently interpreted standard of 34 percent NBS has been applied across the country, creating tremendous cost, stress, and uncertainty, not just for building owners but for ordinary people needing space to live, work, or gather.

“The Government was warned at the time that the rules would cost New Zealanders billions of dollars, including compliance costs of tens of thousands per building in parts of the country with low earthquake risks. The standards don’t even reflect building occupancy, meaning a historic church used a handful of times a year can face the same standard as an apartment block occupied day and night.

“The coming review of this legislation is welcome, but it needs to go further than tinker. We should scrap 2016’s legislation entirely and develop workable, risk-proportionate regulation. This debacle is a lesson in just how badly ACT’s Regulatory Standards Bill is needed.”

Source: ACT Party

ACT is welcoming new Ministry of Health rules restricting the use of puberty blockers for gender identity issues.

“Adolescence can be challenging and confusing, but using medication to deal with gender identity issues can have permanent effects that do real long-term harm. We should support young people to love themselves, not change themselves with experimental medication,” says ACT MP Karen Chhour.

“There was a day when we accepted that electric shock therapy was helpful for wellbeing of our young people. Look how that turned out.

“Internationally, there is increasing concern that there is not good evidence for the safety of puberty blockers for young people grappling with their gender identity. It’s great to see New Zealand now coming into line with countries around the world.

“New Zealand is moving toward a more precautionary approach that puts the safety of young people first, and Kiwis concerned about the role of puberty blockers in our health system have the chance to be heard in consultation that will inform future regulations.”

Source: ACT Party

With public submissions now open on the Treaty Principles Bill, ACT Leader David Seymour is encouraging all New Zealanders to have their say.

“Since 1975 when the Waitangi Tribunal decided the Treaty has ‘principles’, the job of interpreting those principles has been left to unelected judges. That changes today,” says Mr Seymour.

“For the first time, Kiwis of all backgrounds are now able to tell Parliament what they think the Treaty means for future generations of New Zealanders.

“Are we a ‘partnership’ between two different groups with different rights? Or are we a modern multi-ethnic democracy united by common humanity, where each person has the same rights and duties?

“This fundamental question needs to be answered if we are to move forward and solve our problems together.

“Thousands of New Zealanders are marching in Wellington today to make their feelings known. I hope they will now read the Bill and engage in the substance of the debate via the select committee process.

“Many more New Zealanders in the rest of the country are going about their day as normal, working to provide a better future for themselves and their loves ones. I hope they will also make their voice heard by making a submission when they have the time.”

Submissions to the Justice select committee close on 7 January.